The Universal Vortical Singularity

[austintorn@aol.com]

GRAVITY EXPLAINED

The Strength of Gravity, the Feeble Apparent

Gravity is a universal force—for any body:
The force felt by a body is mass proportional;
Yet, the acceleration that’s felt is the inverse!
This coincidence removes all mass dependence.

(Einstein transcended this amazing “coincidental” race
By bodies going straight through curved space.)

Gravity might be derived from the fundamentals,
The byproduct of a small residual after cancelations
Of opposite electric or color charges, and more.
Why then is gravity universal, for its sources are not?

Perhaps the appearance of feebleness is deceptive
Since protons and neutrons are but lightweights.
But why are they so light? Their mass is a compromise
Between a disturbance energy and its cancellation.

The quarks’ color charge disturbs gluons around them,
Small at first,
But larger growing farther from the quark.
These disturbances cost energy, but how to cancel them?
With an anti-quark
Or two complementarily colored quarks.

But the qualifying quarks can’t sit atop the originals,
For quarks have no definite position,
Just a wave function,
And they can’t be localized to a small spread of position,
For this requires a larger energy—so forget nullification.

The compromise is that some residual energy amounts
From the not-completely-canceled
Gluon field disturbances
And from the not-completely-canceled quark positionings,
Thus the proton mass from m=E/cc,
With this tricky element
Of how the gluon disturbance field grows with distance.

(The residual strong energy from color charge also binds
The protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus;
The electromagnetic electron/nuclei charge residuals
Bind atoms into molecules and molecules into materials.)

Asymptotic freedom is a subtle feedback effect
From virtual particles antiscreening the color charge.
This antiscreening builds up gradually,
Especially at first,
Then proceeds more quickly,
Building upon each building.

(Whereas,
Screening happens for electrically charged particles,
Being such as a positive charge
Attracts a negative virtual cloud.)

Thus, at first, since it’s so slow to build, the pressure
To localize the nullifying quarks is quite mild as well.
Thus, there’s no need to very strictly localize and
So the energies are small; so then is the proton mass.

This is the lightness of being.
(Ideas herein were gathered from readings,
esp. Frank Wilczek)

[dipayankar]

Okay let me try and reply. The way I see it gravity is an effect of the Universe expanding, much like the moving of a jet is an effect of the gasses passing out into the atmosphere. Well if you ask me how we can mathematically model this, I guess I will need some time.

If gravity is holding things together what is the cause of gravity? Bending space means nothing to me how is this done?

[G_burnett]

...maybe the question should be "if there is a mass and an equal secondary mass with no spin and no polar state of thus no MF in either do they attract? Does such even exist in the big?

Kind regards graham

[dipayankar]

HI Graham, If such mass does exist, how will it react to anything? If it doesnt react to anything, then what is the reason of having such a mass??

...maybe the question should be "if there is a mass and an equal secondary mass with no spin and no polar state of thus no MF in either do they attract? Does such even exist in the big?

Kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

one word ... potential "energy" ... it will react to wave to absorb wave effect for example. the opposite of condense causal and thus motion of mass .. . i am not to happy with those terms yet ...i will think on it for a while.

kind regards my friend and happy hollidays for you as well .. g

[dipayankar]

Motion of mass will produce kinetic energy and thus electrical charge.

one word ... potential "energy" ... it will react to wave to absorb wave effect for example. the opposite of condense causal and thus motion of mass .. . i am not to happy with those terms yet ...i will think on it for a while.

kind regards my friend and happy hollidays for you as well .. g

[G_burnett]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34610522...ience-science/

enjoy the ponder! graham

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showth...l=1#post106872
I must concur that the creation of a pulse emit in the small is a vortex.
We may not see it because of the speed of the event in the small but with no other explained causal the intuition and logic demands the axiom view given. I will further post again here what I have given Dave in Toronic Concepts thread this pictorial. Your comments are of course welcome.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

What if Infinity/Ether is Illumination in nature. Condensed Illuminated Ether becomes light and attenuated Illuminated Ether becomes transparent. That is why there would be highly attenuated Infinity/Ether in the voids, and Bright Infinity/Ether in Form's.

What you mentioned above is also the proposition of UVS. The model of open monopole system in "Universal evolution mechanism" of a radiating and rotating source at superluminal speed can illustrate this. The illuminated ether that is beyond optical bandwidth would naturally be attenuated to becomes transparent.

What do you think Vincent, based on the potential history of first Substance in Motion, and not so much on the dynamics created by Evolved Substance in Motion.

IDK. UVS assumes the perpetual motion in the universe have always existed as an open system to drive the physical universe in a closed system. The potential energy that begets motion in FS is a wonder beyond the UVS perspective, through UVS model in the metaphysical realm it could only visualize this source in self-perpetuating vortical motion has the characteristics of infinity and eternity and this is imbued into all its nested creations in the physical realm.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Yesterday in my barhroom sink I saw the circular motion of water getting converted into a vortical motion. The first question that crossed my mind is what kind of forces compel such changes?

Your reminded me of Archimedes.

Also it the prime driver is gravity, then in outer space where gravity is unknown and unmeasured, what factors in gravity would effect the motion of galaxies?

The undulating vortical motion of aether that renders the effect of transgalactic gravity in a push manner would drive the galaxies in correlated vortical motion.