Tiny Bits - Momentum in Cosmic Geometry

[G_burnett]

Correction:
Should be "..... flattened by polar vortex." instead of "..... flattened by polar vortices pair."

This is an image that could help illustrated the Tiny Bits Cosmic Geometry. Yes! Its bubble clusters, this might illustrate the molecular plasma clusters as energy shells of star cluster in a spiral arm, pardon me if this is not correct or accurate.



And here is the evidence that might support your Tiny Bits force dynamics for gravity as a pushing force, and mechanism for planetary orbiting, as in plasma cosmology for planetary nebula forming into a star with orbiting planets.

Best to you.

oh this is good

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Thank you, and please pick out any points where you think I need to explain myself better or clearer or just to improve my presentation in any way. Your Friend, Aaron

This is to elaborate specifically on the EMF vortical interactions of star fomalhaut mentioned earlier, on its dynamics manifested as gravity with the overall push effect inward to the core relating to your Tiny Bits theorem.

Image of star Fomalhaut illustrates the isotropic of background radiation in spokes that its plasma matter has glowed at a specific wavelength carried on homogeneous dilated harmonic singular vortices with different angular phases and they are vortically driven in an accretion disk in the background that have specific wavelengths of another bandwidth in electromagnetic waves of polar vortexes. The dynamics of the EMF spokes are center-seeking by pushing inward to the core following an inverse-square law.

Hope to hear from you soon.

Best regards,

[JamesANicholson]

Hello, Vincent, my Friend,

I am so intrigued by this image of FOMALHAUT that you posted for me to look at. And I must admit that I am completely mystified by most of your explanations of what you say is going on there. As in:

"Based on UVS, the spokes radiating from Fomalhaut are satellite plasma vortices, the EMF dynamics are not radiating outward like it is purporting, it is a vortical effect of being pushed towards the core into the vortex column by satellite vortices, initiating from the distintly apparent outer ring, which is the surface of ion atmosphere flattened by polar vortex."


I have no idea what you are referring to with any of the underlined items above as to where they are in the picture or how they are evident to be what you say they are or what your definitions are for those items. I feel that you must have an intuitive grasp of what you are talking about that just eludes me.

And I know that you are attempting to describe this picture in terms of how it works with your UVS theory, with which you are very converse and comfortable. But I am still stuck on the very vortex premise. It seems to me (and this can't be the whole story) that you believe that vortexes exists as entities in their own right and that they then by their very existence are able to cause things to be drawn to them and to swirl around them as if by their will or something, which to me, I cannot comprehend.

I hope that you can help me understand what it is that you see as the causal or structural forces that create and maintain a basic vortex. And any different kinds of vortexes, if you divide them into types. What are their causal forces? What distinctions do you make between different ones?

Myself I can only see how there must be outside forces, like a low pressure cold front of Air meeting a high pressure warm front of Air and the struggle to neutralize each other or come to equilibrium (averaging), coupled with the condensation action of gaseous water being changed into liquid water or solid water (ice) creating a spacial vacuum for tornados and hurricanes. And we can look even deeper into the subatomic action of photons within the molecular atoms of water molecules to follow the cause down to ground zero. But I think that there are very different causal forces responsible for Gravity vortexes which may or may not necessarily have spin, although, that is often the case. A vortex to me is any place where a convergence is taking place--a coming together of opposites. A city is a "vortex" of commerce and human activity. They are the mere structures of the manner in which the particular convergence manifests as a practical least-resistant-solution of coming together by coincidence of proximity or by geometric configuration, which is my preferred choice (for gravity, at least).


Come Back!

Warmly, Aaron

[G_burnett]

Vincent,

Lots to share and many questions.




------------------

Vincent,

Look at how similar this picture of the Universe is with the bubble picture that you sent to me. You can see the same bubble cell walls, especially the Cosmic bubble junction lines--where the bubbles touch each other and share "edges." I think I need to track down the original source of this photo, though.


I took this off of this site: Plasma Cosmology.net

http://www.plasmacosmology.net/index.html

Aaron

heres a new one

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi...ull/2008/516/1

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Aaron,

Apology for my tardiness, was away on some private matter to settle that had occupied all my bandwidth for a while. During this time was also looking deeper into the push-in gravity concept and the relationship with vortex.

Let me clarify a few points on singular vortex mechanism:

- Singular vortex is triggered and driven by an external force; a torque-induced precession externally applied to a suspended spheroid that then spawn singular vortex in its viscous mass by a generated torque-free precession that has developed from the core. The informal theoretical description for the mechanism in details is explained with how a polar vortex is formed is what you have read on my website. Earth revolves around Sun, this is the external driving centrifugal force interaction from the Sun on Earth, the now understood push-in gravity as described by your Tiny Bits theory is also an external force, Earth's rotation generates a centrifugal force on this axis on its viscous mass, is a prerequisite factor of the singular vortex mechanism but it is not the driving force of a singular vortex.

- The cold front and warm front collision of atmospheric vortex and its thermal mechanical force, is merely a triggered effect, has a feed-back mechanism that loops and is also a self perpetuating driving force, is not the triggering mechanism that initiates a singular vortex. Based on UVS, the low pressured vortex column is developed by the spinning motion and therefore viscous mass is spread out by this centrifugal force.

The more detailed functioning mechanism of singular vortex explaining harmonic vortices, vortical spokes, spiral arms and its paradigm are covered in the model of Universal Vortical Singularity. Lately I have also realized an essential integra part of singular vortex mechanism, which is now termed as vortrex, is also included there.

I hope the above clarification can help you to understand singular vortex mechanism based on UVS, if not I am prepared to go any direction to clarify it further with you. Just help me to understand what stops you from seeing these fundamental that had been simplified and so clear to me. Perhaps you might have to temporary drop some of your established ideas so as to receive this unheard-of concept, if you can come to term with this is a paradoxical universe.

I have also went into further investigation on push-in gravity effect and its relationship with singular vortex, the source for planetary gravity, cogency study and overall compatibility with conventional knowledge on gravity, and have eventually come up with a bubble model. This is concerning your Tiny Bits theory, so let me go into this in detail with you and develop the concept along the way.

More to come..... focusing on push-in gravity effect.

Hello, Vincent, my Friend,

I am so intrigued by this image of FOMALHAUT that you posted for me to look at. And I must admit that I am completely mystified by most of your explanations of what you say is going on there. As in:

"Based on UVS, the spokes radiating from Fomalhaut are satellite plasma vortices, the EMF dynamics are not radiating outward like it is purporting, it is a vortical effect of being pushed towards the core into the vortex column by satellite vortices, initiating from the distintly apparent outer ring, which is the surface of ion atmosphere flattened by polar vortex."


I have no idea what you are referring to with any of the underlined items above as to where they are in the picture or how they are evident to be what you say they are or what your definitions are for those items. I feel that you must have an intuitive grasp of what you are talking about that just eludes me.

And I know that you are attempting to describe this picture in terms of how it works with your UVS theory, with which you are very converse and comfortable. But I am still stuck on the very vortex premise. It seems to me (and this can't be the whole story) that you believe that vortexes exists as entities in their own right and that they then by their very existence are able to cause things to be drawn to them and to swirl around them as if by their will or something, which to me, I cannot comprehend.

I hope that you can help me understand what it is that you see as the causal or structural forces that create and maintain a basic vortex. And any different kinds of vortexes, if you divide them into types. What are their causal forces? What distinctions do you make between different ones?

Myself I can only see how there must be outside forces, like a low pressure cold front of Air meeting a high pressure warm front of Air and the struggle to neutralize each other or come to equilibrium (averaging), coupled with the condensation action of gaseous water being changed into liquid water or solid water (ice) creating a spacial vacuum for tornados and hurricanes. And we can look even deeper into the subatomic action of photons within the molecular atoms of water molecules to follow the cause down to ground zero. But I think that there are very different causal forces responsible for Gravity vortexes which may or may not necessarily have spin, although, that is often the case. A vortex to me is any place where a convergence is taking place--a coming together of opposites. A city is a "vortex" of commerce and human activity. They are the mere structures of the manner in which the particular convergence manifests as a practical least-resistant-solution of coming together by coincidence of proximity or by geometric configuration, which is my preferred choice (for gravity, at least).


Come Back!

Warmly, Aaron

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Aaron again,

Here is the bubble model, is still a work in progress.


Diagram of a steady state suspended air bubble with a smaller bubble on its outer skin.

For a freely suspended air bubble formed in atmospheric viscous mass with an outer skin of liquid, the repeling force of air pressure following an inverse-square law will push and consolidate those higher density air molecules inside the bubble toward the core. It can be qualitatively predicted in a simplified manner that in a steady state air bubble that contains carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen that have molecuar weight of 44.01, 32.00 and 28.01 respectively, the heaviest carbon dioxide molecules will consolidate in cluster as a spheroid and occupy the inner core, oxygen molecules will overlay on the carbon dioxide spheroid and the lightest nitrogen molecules will overlay on the outermost layer inside the bubble. The air molecules are consistently pushed toward the core following the inverse-sqaure law of air pressure with an inertial force repelled from the equipotential surface of the spherical air bubble that is formed under atmospheric pressure. Should the smaller bubble merges into the bigger bubble, the nitrogen molecules would be mixed in nitrogen layer of the larger bubble while the oxygen and carbon dioxide molecules would be pushed directly to the core and merges with their molecular clusters accordingly. If a bubble of nitrogen is introduced inside the carbon dioxide spheroid at a six o'clock position as shown, it would be pushed outward by the heavier density carbon dioxide molecules, relatively rising to the surface on a easiest path, paradoxically it would be observed to be moving in a vertical downward direction passing through the oxygen molecule layer and eventually merges into the nitrogen layer. There are many details involved that need to be addressed, nevertheless, the primary focus of this study is on qulitative analysis on fundamental working principles of gravity as a push-in force.

more to come....

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

The above left image is Oort cloud of Sun, the image on above middle is the Bubble nebula, and the image on above right is the Southern Crab nebula.

On looking for the fundamental source that could generate the effect of push-in gravity effect within solar system, take a look at Oort cloud and the glowing Bubble nebula. The experts believed that there is an invisible larger spheroid encompassing the Oort cloud. The southern crab nebula has a inner hourglass shape plasma glow inside a much larger plasma glow with similar shape; based on UVS, these are polar vortexes pair on two invisible spheroidal shape gaseous layers, it is logical to suggest that there are larger invisible spheroid that encompases the nebulae. This is the very foundation that gravity is a push-in inertia force following an inverse square law.

The Bubble-shaped Nebula NGC 6781 has glowing disc horizontally that is similar to the Kuiper belt, the scattered disc and the disc-shaped inner Oort cloud of Sun, the spherical glowing and enveloping gas shell of this nebula also seems to have similar pattern as the spherical outer Oort cloud. Oort cloud is a spherical cloud of comets believed to lie roughly 50,000 AU, or nearly a light-year, from the Sun, and comet is known to be enveloped in a huge coma.

Based on hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity, this glowing and enveloping gas shell is vortically formed in a precession effect, and this is a supportive evidence that graivty is compressing force pushing towards the core generated by the vortical core-seeking force of the wobbling polar vortex pair; an electroweak interaction in accretion discs of the intensely wobbling vortices that form as a bubble shells. IMO, the vortical spin along the vortex ring would cause the inward and outward repelling force of viscous mass. The external vortical interaction that generates gravity on a suspended spheroid is less felt within the bubble, a generally even repelling inertia force pushing matter toward the core would be a more prominent force.


The Ring nebula

The electrostatic repelling force of electric charge spherically confined inside the huge magnetospheres of a star is enormously stronger in a different state of matter with the same principles in pressure dynamics of an air bubble freely suspended in atmosphere. Based on singular vortex mechanism, the powerful electrostatic repelling force within the spheroid is a vortical effect of electromagnetic vortex, in a push-in manner it consolidates viscous matter into spheroid with heavier matter occupying its inner core. Interplanetary gravity are the effects of interacting electromagnetic field of planets in their orbits pulling each other in a push manner to the core of the planets within a common encompassing electromagnetic field of their Sun.

Although the inner core of Ring nebula have been vortically flattened into a disc shape by its polar vortexes pair, the inertia force of this flattened disc still has the potential of a spherodial structure that results in vortical core-seeking force and causes the push-in effect of planetary gravity. The dwarf star in the middle of this nebula has not been completely overcome by the polar votexes pair would have an oblate spheroidal shape. The invisible speroidal viscous mass encompassing this diffused star in a glowing nebula would be much bigger. This push-in gravity concept in a bubble model is not very complex to understand but it is very paradoxical that is counterintuitive for direct comprehension.

The force dynamics of electromagnetic polar vortex in the invisible cosmic molecular spheroid (magnetosphere) of a star is comprehensible as the strong interaction of EMF culmination by the vortex column, and electroweak interaction is the force dynamics on accretion disk. Mass is merely the measurements for this inertial force as gravity in a relative manner of the electromagnetic pressure repelling inside the magnetospheres pushing matters towards the core following an inverse-square law.

See an external link on solar system formation that illustrates the process of a supernova vortically forming into a disc shape planetary nebula, and eventually its charged entropies in the nucleus are consolidated as a star with orbiting planets. The vortical force dynamics are center seeking toward zero points that follows the inverse-square law, vortically pushing and consolidating viscous matter inward to the cores, acting collectively on the most efficient spheroidal shape point masses that subsequently have consolidated as Sun and its planets, with conserved momentum transferred to the consolidate planets for rotating and revolving on orbits around the Sun; orbiting objects are formed in vortically scattered stellar clouds by centrifugal force and consolidation of viscous matter by its vortical core-seeking force.

These vortical core-seeking force is collectively formed by the leading arcs of eccentric harmonic vortices in the accretion disc around the main vortex in varying angular phase, these leading arc section of harmonic vortices drive viscous mass vortically toward the core.



p.s. Have experienced some time-out problems previously with this forum and had lost all the message typed, therefore is now doing in bit and pieces for longer post.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hello, Vincent, my Friend,

I am so intrigued by this image of FOMALHAUT that you posted for me to look at. And I must admit that I am completely mystified by most of your explanations of what you say is going on there. As in:

"Based on UVS, the spokes radiating from Fomalhaut are satellite plasma vortices, the EMF dynamics are not radiating outward like it is purporting, it is a vortical effect of being pushed towards the core into the vortex column by satellite vortices, initiating from the distintly apparent outer ring, which is the surface of ion atmosphere flattened by polar vortex."

Please refer to the hypothetical model of Universal Vortical Singularity on Progressive vortical harmonic series of singular vortex for the details. I will try to answer your questions briefly here. You may skip this section if you do not find it relevant to your actual queries, or if you have found the explanation in the posts earlier.


Protoplanetary disks (green glow) and stellar jets (red glow)

The protoplanetary disk pair is a new star in the making, based on UVS, stellar jets are polar vortex pair, this infer there is a huge invisible ionized atmosphere that the polar vortex pair could then be formed. All the spokes of star FOMALHAUT would be the top view of the supposed plasma polar vortex, every spoke is a leading section of a eccentric harmoic singular vortex ring of a specific angular phase, around this arc a satellite vortex would be formed and viscous mass are vortically pushed towards the core. The nature of this atmosphere is plasma hence the term plasma satellite vortex, plasma is streams of ionized particles that are largely electromagnetic. Conventional knowledge although have stated that stellar jet is an unsolved problem of physics, but is generally believed that they are jets that beam outward from the core. Contary to that, UVS predicts that stellar jets are polar vortex pair and stellar jets are formed when they are vortically pushing towards the core along the vortex column, causing a plasmatic glow of hydrogen atoms similar to aurora.

I now see the dust rings of star FOMALHAUT as the vortrexes of the polar vortex, similar to the green glow of the protoplanetary disk. However, I am not absolute sure from this image of star Fomalhaut that the rings are vortrexes. The center portion would be flattened by polar vortex pair as a disc, is where the ecliptic plane of the star is and its planets would orbit the star on this plane. There should be an outer spheroidal collection of viscous matter encompassing the flattened disc, rendering the push-in effect of gravity.

Hopefully these have answered some of your queries on this issue.

Best regards,

[G_burnett]

Hi Aaron again,

Here is the bubble model, is still a work in progress.


Diagram of a steady state suspended air bubble with a smaller bubble on its outer skin.

For a freely suspended air bubble formed in atmospheric viscous mass with an outer skin of liquid, the repeling force of air pressure following an inverse-square law will push and consolidate those higher density air molecules inside the bubble toward the core. It can be qualitatively predicted in a simplified manner that in a steady state air bubble that contains carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen that have molecuar weight of 44.01, 32.00 and 28.01 respectively, the heaviest carbon dioxide molecules will consolidate in cluster as a spheroid and occupy the inner core, oxygen molecules will overlay on the carbon dioxide spheroid and the lightest nitrogen molecules will overlay on the outermost layer inside the bubble. The air molecules are consistently pushed toward the core following the inverse-sqaure law of air pressure with an inertial force repelled from the equipotential surface of the spherical air bubble that is formed under atmospheric pressure. Should the smaller bubble merges into the bigger bubble, the nitrogen molecules would be mixed in nitrogen layer of the larger bubble while the oxygen and carbon dioxide molecules would be pushed directly to the core and merges with their molecular clusters accordingly. If a bubble of nitrogen is introduced inside the carbon dioxide spheroid at a six o'clock position as shown, it would be pushed outward by the heavier density carbon dioxide molecules, relatively rising to the surface on a easiest path, paradoxically it would be observed to be moving in a vertical downward direction passing through the oxygen molecule layer and eventually merges into the nitrogen layer. There are many details involved that need to be addressed, nevertheless, the primary focus of this study is on qulitative analysis on fundamental working principles of gravity as a push-in force.

more to come....

had to mention the same effect on the eyes of our local planet showing compressed energy turning fluid?
Peace ~ graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

had to mention the same effect on the eyes of our local planet showing compressed energy turning fluid?
Peace ~ graham

Hi Graham;

Yes the same effect would compress stellar clouds as fluid/viscous mass, in the form of molten matter, liquid and gas.

These scientific theories are already quite well establised on consolidated stellar materials compressed as a suspended spheroid of fluid under the effect of gravity, some planetary bodies such as Earth has became stratified on the surface, formed a crust layer.

Thanks.