Tiny Bits - Momentum in Cosmic Geometry

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Aaron,

Concerning the fundamental cause for the push-in effect of gravity:

Based on hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity, the magnetospheres of a planet is encompassed and compressed by the magnetospheres of its star, and the vortically consolidated molecular star clusters as galaxy formed in the accretion disc of the galactic vortex are encompassed and compressed by the magnetospheres of the galactic spheroid. In a paradigm the galactic spheroids are vortically consolidated as molecular clusters, apparently as galaxy clusters spiraling in a cosmic vortex they are encompassed and compressed by the magnetospheres of the cosmic spheroid; these are the fundamental cause for gravity. This is only a general view.




The above are images on torus shape magnetospheres of Earth and galactic spheroid of Cartwheel galaxy group.

The outer plasmatic shell in a spheroidal shape with pressure equilibrium around the surface is a plasmatic energy spheroid, has powerful electrical repulsion force surrounding its equipotential surface. When star clusters are collected by vortical interaction in a galactic vortex, the stars collected in cluster are held together by the strong interaction of their electromagnetic vortices acting between stars in a molecular cohesion manner, pushed apart by surface tension of their plasmatic spheroids with powerful electrostatic repulsion between their surfaces that have same polarity of positive electrical charge.

Refer to a UVS topic on the structure of a galaxy that explains the molecular structure of stars and galaxies.

Awaiting for your comments.

Best regards,

[G_burnett]

hi my friend

I have a link here to a Berlin translation ..site might be notable as well

http://www.nature.com/physics/lookin...man/index.html

let me know what you think? Graham peace

actually its real CASPAR stuff here ..

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Aaron; its been a while since our last exchange of notes, I have bear your query in mind and all these while was trying to come out with more comprehensive explanation for gravity based on UVS on a casual basis, so here it is.

Please visit my revamped website on geometrical structure of an atom, where I post the UVS gravity concept inspired by you.

Have also add more notes to a topic on vortical core-seeking force we have previously explored with star Fomalhaut, this round I used plasma lamp to illustrate, hopefully this is clearer.

Best regards, and come back!

Hello, Vincent, my Friend,

I am so intrigued by this image of FOMALHAUT that you posted for me to look at. And I must admit that I am completely mystified by most of your explanations of what you say is going on there. As in:

"Based on UVS, the spokes radiating from Fomalhaut are satellite plasma vortices, the EMF dynamics are not radiating outward like it is purporting, it is a vortical effect of being pushed towards the core into the vortex column by satellite vortices, initiating from the distintly apparent outer ring, which is the surface of ion atmosphere flattened by polar vortex."


I have no idea what you are referring to with any of the underlined items above as to where they are in the picture or how they are evident to be what you say they are or what your definitions are for those items. I feel that you must have an intuitive grasp of what you are talking about that just eludes me.

And I know that you are attempting to describe this picture in terms of how it works with your UVS theory, with which you are very converse and comfortable. But I am still stuck on the very vortex premise. It seems to me (and this can't be the whole story) that you believe that vortexes exists as entities in their own right and that they then by their very existence are able to cause things to be drawn to them and to swirl around them as if by their will or something, which to me, I cannot comprehend.

I hope that you can help me understand what it is that you see as the causal or structural forces that create and maintain a basic vortex. And any different kinds of vortexes, if you divide them into types. What are their causal forces? What distinctions do you make between different ones?

Myself I can only see how there must be outside forces, like a low pressure cold front of Air meeting a high pressure warm front of Air and the struggle to neutralize each other or come to equilibrium (averaging), coupled with the condensation action of gaseous water being changed into liquid water or solid water (ice) creating a spacial vacuum for tornados and hurricanes. And we can look even deeper into the subatomic action of photons within the molecular atoms of water molecules to follow the cause down to ground zero. But I think that there are very different causal forces responsible for Gravity vortexes which may or may not necessarily have spin, although, that is often the case. A vortex to me is any place where a convergence is taking place--a coming together of opposites. A city is a "vortex" of commerce and human activity. They are the mere structures of the manner in which the particular convergence manifests as a practical least-resistant-solution of coming together by coincidence of proximity or by geometric configuration, which is my preferred choice (for gravity, at least).


Come Back!

Warmly, Aaron

[JamesANicholson]

Hello, again, Vincent,

I see you have been a very busy boy. It will take me a while to take a good look at all of the excellent work you have put together and check out all of the copius references that you have linked up to in your latest revamped website. Well done! Lots of terrific diagrams and photos and drawings to illustrate your concept. I have been doing some thinking on my own as well and am looking forward to sharing with you as soon as I can work out my wording so that it is easier to follow.

Best regards, Aaron

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hey Aaron, my cotemporary boy buddy for push-in gravity ponders,

While you take your time, here are some stuff I would like to bring to your attention concerning gravity.

This post is to establish a framework in order to collerate with Aaron on gravity ponders as a push-in inertia. The issused raised here are only meant for people who have adopted the concept Aether, plasma filled universe or the likes, it brought out some very acute and sensitive issues just for the purpose of exchanging ideas among the members of this ToE forum in an amicable manner, has no intention to flame anyone from the public on different camp who are not for the ideas, nor want to contest in any debate with it with anyone. Any term or statement if offensive in any manner or whatsoever is most regretted. And those sharing the gravity ponders in this direction are most welcome to join in for discussions or state any comment.

Excerpts from : Universal Vortical Singularity clarifies the concept of gravity

General theory of relativity (GR) for galactic gravity is based on stars revolving around its Galactic center in orbits is governed by relative gravitational attraction between stars.

Universal Vortical Singularity postulates that stars did not orbit its galactic center with galactic gravity, stars in a galaxy is spiraling on a galactic vortex in a galactic spheroid. This suggest that GR is based on a misconception caused by a complexly inversed illusion.

Based on Universal Vortical Singularity, the effect of gravity is caused by electromagnetic force repelling inside a plasmatic spheroid driven in a vortical system, in paradigm shifts of this single model, the mechanism for galactic gravity, geometrical gravity and quantum gravity are entirely compatible. For elucidation see the geometrically structure of a galaxy, evolution of stars and galaxies and the geometrical structure of an atom.

Theory of gravitational lensing effect based on general theory of relativity postulates that light waves have mass and is thus subjected to gravitational effect that causes it to bend near large celestial mass. The effect can be described by observing several deflected images of a distant street lamp looking through a wine glass.

Universal Vortical Singularity postulates that light is refracted in a curved path in viscous matter of an invisible plasmatic spheroid on a large celestial object with varying refractive index cause by density gradient in the medium consolidated by geometrical gravity. Based on Universal Vortical Singularity, this is the fundamental reason that light would bend in a curved path when it enters an invisible medium that has density gradient caused by gravitational compression following the principle of inverse-square law; light bends in a curved path through optical refraction in the medium with density gradient. This suggest that the theory of gravitational lensing effect is based on a misconception caused by a complexly inversed illusion.

Image on right is a negative picture of Eddington's photograph of the 1919 solar eclipse experiment, below the Sun it showed the light of a star that has traveled in a curved path, believed to be under influence of Sun's gravitational field.
1919 solar eclipse

Gas as a lower density viscous medium has dynamic similarity in fluid principles as a higher density viscous medium, when light enters an invisible atmosphere, it could be refracted in a gaseous atmosphere like it is refracted in water. Invisible atmosphere layers have different density at different altitudes, follows the principle of inverse-square law, hence has gradually varying refractive index that varies with density of gas at varying altitude; density gradient.

The concept for GR that gravity of a mass would bend light in a curved path is mathematically equivalent to gravity would condense an invisible medium on the celestial mass following the principle of inverse-square law that causes light to bend in this medium that has varying refractive index as a result of density gradient.

Why assume the space above photosphere of Sun is vacuum? See "what is dark matter?"

Universal Vortical Singularity based on unisonal vortex mechanism postulates that Singularity (astronomy) emerges from a single point of zero volume that has enormous but finite inertial forces that renders the effect of gravity, it does not compress into a single point of zero volume with infinite gravity; this is a complexly inversed illusion cause by paradoxical effect of Universal Vortical Singularity. The dynamics of the universe is not expanding in an explosion, it is vortically imploding in a process of vortex dilation on an emerging ultra vortex. This is an ultimate for complexly inversed illusion caused by the paradoxical effect of Universal Vortical Singularity in the physical universe.

Based on the model of Universal Vortical Singularity, the phenomenon of expanding universe is a localized vortical event caused by the effects of an ultra galaxy vortex (hypothetical).


Enjoy, and looking forward to your insightful thought when you are done working out your wording.

Best regards,

Hello, again, Vincent,

I see you have been a very busy boy. It will take me a while to take a good look at all of the excellent work you have put together and check out all of the copius references that you have linked up to in your latest revamped website. Well done! Lots of terrific diagrams and photos and drawings to illustrate your concept. I have been doing some thinking on my own as well and am looking forward to sharing with you as soon as I can work out my wording so that it is easier to follow.

Best regards, Aaron

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Have not heard from you for quite a while Aaron.

You have to take a look at what Graham had recently posted in my thread on a recent publishing by NASA; it is a scientific evidence that supports your gravity theorem!



Voyager Squashes View of Solar System
07.02.08 -- Scientists using data from NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft have observed the bubble of solar wind surrounding the solar system is not round, but has a squashed shape, according to recent data published as part of a series of papers in this week's (July 3) Nature.
› Full story

Best to you.

[labelwench]

Hello Vincent, Aaron and others,

The vortex model has already illustrated that it can put together geophysics, meterology and oceanology of Earth science.

EMF vortex dynamics also seems to be able to explain the force dynamics for capillary action in plants, the asymmetricity of biological patterns as well, and splitting nuclei of a cell. This potentially amalgamates classical physics and biology!

posted 03-25-2008

Your reference to biology and plants caught my interest. Will continue reading the rest of this thread and Aaron's original papers before attempting any further communication.

Interesting discussion thus far, having read back several posts before deciding I had better start from square one.

Labelwench

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hello Vincent, Aaron and others,

posted 03-25-2008

Your reference to biology and plants caught my interest. Will continue reading the rest of this thread and Aaron's original papers before attempting any further communication.

Interesting discussion thus far, having read back several posts before deciding I had better start from square one.

Labelwench

Hello Labelwench,

You are welcome to join us to explore the causality of gravity.

IMO Aaron has a good theoretical paper on this, unlike many other gravity theorem I have came across, his theorem is most down to earth that follows the principle for conservation of energy, and did not warp or morp spacetime nor create any hypothetical particle.

Currently, in accounting for the cause of gravity, there is a zoo of hypothetical particles created and then reified through mathematical construct in different gravity theories with all sorts of imaginary dimension based on supra sense of beliefs that have different degree of uncertainties and they do not refer to reality.

I was exploring Alfven's plasma cosmology then his analogy on solar wind encapsulated in a boundary strikes me intuitively that gravity is a push-in event. Then it was followed by an explosion of discoveries for me on my UVS model.

Hope you would enjoy his work like I do.

Best regards,