A geometric Theory of Everything

[~boots~]

- most excellent -
the Royal garter be around and Order of Odour be similarly around, certainly upon and within the vicinity of your ~boots~ and (accordingly) in the air we breathe.

Ah! man!!!

: -)

(plastic bags with airtight zippers)

you smell.

(The boreds prayer)



(plastic bags with airtight zippers)

training pants1 go south, divide and (unlike nappies)
protect the nose of the beholder.

(The boreds prayer ends)

You may now slosh2 on your pews3

1,2,3
distinctly erudite humour

LOL..I must be out of practice, I'm actually lost for words

[SB_UK]

LOL..I must be out of practice, I'm actually lost for words

reform of the church (a sneak preview)

The structure of the papal hat would make for the ideal porti-potty -
- though the reflex to don a hat would need to be circumscribed in circumspection

: -)

(or at least checked for contents priortay porter).

[~boots~]

reform of the church (a sneak preview)

The structure of the papal hat would make for the ideal porti-potty -
- though the reflex to don a hat would need to be circumscribed in circumspection

: -)

(or at least checked for contents priortay porter).

you know, that's EXACTLY what I was thinking..I think..

I need to research that a bit deeper ...

[leskey]

[quote=SB_UK;65761]
- the duality occurs upon a motion which is orthogonal to the duality and so is essentially invisible from perspective duality...

I'm trying to describe all efforts to define that essentially invisible space as being very difficult indeed because that space is homogenous from the perspective of our space -
- and so perturbations in that space lead to changes which (similarly) cannot be detected -
because no matter what happens -
we're subject to observations on that space which report back the existence of 'purely homogenous matrix' regardless.

There's no delta -
no structure -
no observable change - and so the absence of coherent rate of change in that space results in the apparent lack of presence of anything within that space -

- however the structure into that space suggests otherwise (the perfect structure which exists in the space between the two strands of the DNA double helix if we examine the elements involved in hydrogen bonds connecting the two strands).

This is the basis to 'God' - and the saying that he's everywhere (within us, in the air we breathe ... ... ... ~etc~ ... ... ... ) -

- subtracting all mystery (whenever 'God' is mentioned scientists generally turn away) -
'God' is a layer of unstructure which supports structure -

'God' is a metaphor -
and the choice of nickname of Higgs Boson as 'God' particle is wise.

(structure is any product of energetic evolution)

- and it transpires that the Universal simplest structure represents the exact same structure as all emergent structures generated from it (hierarchically from it) -
all superstructures of the same basic form -

- black holes are everywhere (to be taken absolutely literally).

- so imagine differing levels of black hole hierarchical structures formed upon hierarchically lower black hole structures -

...The connection here > --- < of ---
is an orthogonal shift

~*~

- the black bit in a classical black hole represents motion of energy orthogonal to the duality (above) of structure (which we can see) (the bit of the black hole which isn't black).

- and so we have the idea of -

evolution as being upon a supporting 3d bed of fundamental structure (matrix) which must be of unknowable (not open to empirical manipulation) structure -
- because it is defined as supporting a duality of set of structures which are defined to be orthogonal to that space - as a condition of any energetic structures existing in that space.[/quote]

Hi, SB.

I think you triple score!

[Mikal]

Many scientists and psysicists have agreed that there is an unexplained mystery in the Atom.....yet only afew have crossed the line to say that might be an explanation of God which we just have not understood....


Mikal

[AntonioLao]

evolution occurring by cycles of (3d-4d-13d)n geometric structure

Won't it be simpler to work with 123-123-123-123... cycle? In this sense, there is only 3 dimensions at each level of existence (LOE). So your 3d-4d would become 123-1 and your 13d would be 123-123-123-123-1.

[SB_UK]

Won't it be simpler to work with 123-123-123-123... cycle? In this sense, there is only 3 dimensions at each level of existence (LOE). So your 3d-4d would become 123-1 and your 13d would be 123-123-123-123-1.

thanks

(maths is fun when it has a sense of humour)

- When we started calculus at 11 or so -
nobody ever explained why we couldn't just count the squares under a curve drawn on graph paper -
it's really not obvious.

Origami geometries might help -
certainly'd be more fun.

Teachers have forgotten that 'why?' the kids need bother -
is of crucial importance in motivation.

Meccano, lego, origami, functional radio-controlled vehicles which have their specs drawn up on CAD -
- kids are much better than the education which they're subjected to -

point,
context,
association,

encouraging questions and finding (rather than knowing) answers

- most of all though introducing kiddy (through learning) into ever new vistas for 'fun' -

- without 'fun' or the prospect of 'fun' -
we have a problem.

123 cigar 1
123 cigar 2

[duality]

123 cigar 3

(through the centre)

generating 3 cigars which become 1

123 -> 1

((1(2(3-123-1)2)3)-123)->1

where 1 -> 1 on the next level up.

http://www.toequest.com/forum/religi...html#post68990

[~boots~]

[QUOTE=SB_UK;68989] thanks

(maths is fun when it has a sense of humour)

- When we started calculus at 11 or so -
[QUOTE]

did we actually DO calculus?
where was I???
I don't remember

[Knot_Me]

Sorry - this thread brings back unpleasant memories -

- I think I may have been avoiding it -

(you'll see what I mean if you scan back through it).

I read through it and I understand completely Apparently I have "a thing" for the under dog - no matter where I go

With every fiber of my being I believe those with a different perspective have a right to speak their mind within the prearranged rules of coarse. I did not see where you deserved such rude treatment I did not see any violation of rules.

I apologize for any hurts I caused with the re-opening of this thread. I felt you had a right to speak your mind and be treated with respect not only by members but especially by the staff.

Diversity isn't the enemy fear of it is


If a simple minded person like me can figure that out then all these well educated people should already know this and behave as civilized intellectuals on a quest - not school children out to make fun of those who are different.

I was lucky in that I read through other threads before I came here - I would have come to believe every one was fearful and unfriendly toward any one who dare to be different or present ideas that are unconventional. There are some real nice folks here who I think really are interested in learning about the many facets of our existence.

As you can see I need no special colors on my user name to be a bit of a "mother hen" I think I was sort of born to be protective of my friends . . . .

[AntonioLao]

why we couldn't just count the squares under a curve

Archimedes was concentratingly counting grains of sands within the circle and was killed by the advancing Syrian army. His power of concentration while taking a bath made him jumped out into the street naked shouting 'Eureka!' when he discovered the physical law of bouyancy.