Solving the puzzle pieces for the theory of everything

[joshua]

The Puzzle pieces
1). How is it possible that the speed of light is constant in all reference frames independent of the relative starting speed of the source?

2). What is the exact mechanism of gravitational attraction? Is it a pulling?

3). How is it that the mass in the universe is expanding at an increasing acceleration? Is there a counter driving force to gravitation?

4). How does increasing a gravitational field slow down time?

5). How can speed and acceleration affect relative time and space?

6). How did the universe's mass inflate faster than the laws of physics at the first instant of the big bang.

7). Is there a substance to space itself? How does wave radiation travel if there is no medium? Why is it different than all other foms of wave travel?

. Why are all the laws of the physical universe constant in your own reference frame, independent of any motion in relation to outside your reference frame?

9). What is time? How can relative motion effect it?

10). Why does space, measured across, appear to be flat?

11). What is quantum entanglement? And how does it relate to relativity?

12). Why do black holes appear to be smaller is some older galaxies that younger galaxies? Are they evaporating? How?

13). Why does gravity, gravitation, act differently so much weaker weaker, than the other fundamental forces. Could they all be part of the same mechanism?

Could one concept unite all of these questions into a general understanding of how the universe operates, and explain each and every question?

What if the answer was yes, would the physics society of today be able to accept it? What if it wasn't a far out explaination, but a simple three dimensional explaination using observations of physical laws we all ready know. Would the proponents of string theories, dark matter, dark energy, multiple dimensions, multiple universes be able to admit that they are wrong?


In history, each time that we, as scientists, believe that we have found the smallest thing we were able to find something smaller. Each time that we thought we knew something as fact someone came along and through a curve and changed, clarified the underlying principle that demonstrated the true laws underlying our assumption of the fact.

Here goes, here is what Einstein meant when he said: "Imagination is more important that knowledge", he didn't mean to ignore knowledge, he meant to be creative with the knowledge that we know and solve the puzzle by using your imagination to place the puzzle pieces in the proper perspective so as to see the entire picture. Or as Einstein also stated: " I am not so interested in the details as to understand what God was thinking".

In the year 1919, the Harvard Physics department conjectured that Gravity must be a by-product of the other forces. As it turns out that was the same year that Eddington observered that the orbit of Mercury was measure more accurately by Einstein's relativity than by Newton's laws and Einstein became a Physics Rock Star.
Both Einsten and Newton never addressed the concept of the mechanism of how Gravity works, neither one could rationallize a way that everything cane together. Newton thought Gravity was instantaneous and Einstein thought that gravity travelled at the speed of light. But Einstein chose to create time and space as a dimension and claimed that matter warped both time and space and called it space-time, two sides of a single coin.

Ok, now here is what they missed according to my understand and abilities to put the puzzle pieces together.

Gravity does travel at or slightly faster than the speed of light, but it has a continous starting point. Each and every piece of matter has electromagnetic fields, poles. These fields decay into a monopole gravitational field, a wave. In other words, all matter is decaying into its most basic form, the gravitational wave. The creation of time and space are wave function, actions, of this energy transfer process to its most basic, stable, form.

So the universe is governed by an overall process of mass and energy decaying into space
Time is the change in amount of mass- energy as it decays, frequency of wave distribution, and space is the area/ volume of gravitational wave distribution. The big bang was a critical mass explosion of the built up monopole gravitational wave, each quanta of matter formed together creating the other three forces and the slow decay process began. We measure time by the slow decay process. as space formed initially and continuously keeps forming, gravitational waves interact by a constructive wave interference and since the waves cannot change their frequency or length, the resulting force of Gravitational wave synchronization is the force (the gravitational constant) is kicked back ( the missing link of the Huygens' principle) all the way to the mass or energy generating the gravitational waves and thus gravity. It is like a zipper bringing material together, except it is a continously generated zipper. With this in mind I will touch upon two answers and let you digest the rest if you are truely interested to understand.

The reason the universe is expanding at an increasing rate is because Newton is correct and F= M x A. Since gravitation synchronizes and does not pull, the outward force of the big bang in one direction has not changed. Since mass is continously decreasing as it is decaying into space itself then the remaining mass is continously increasing in its acceleration. Since all matter, even photons, have a decaying electromagnetic field into a gravitational field and all gravitational fields synchronize, then space itself is flattening into one big constructive interfering wave and mass is lining up on a plane.

Time and space are relative because they are wave functions as sound is relative because it is a wave function. Simple example, if you could instantly travel at the speed of sound then you will not here the sound generated from your starting point. If you travel at the speed of gravitational wave, light, then you would not age relative to your starting point because time is a function of wave generation as sound is a function of wave generation.

Black holes shrink because eventually more matter is converted to space than is taken in.

So simply stated, time, space, and gravitational wave synchronization are three actions of a misunderstood process of how the universe operates. Simple stated, the universe was a tightly wound ball of bound particle and is transitioning to a wave, a potential to kinetic energy transfer. Uniquely it is the lower dimensional road that solves the problem of how the universe works and not the string theory higher dimensional road. The universe is decreasing in dimensions ever so slowly.

[analog]

Hello Dr. Joshua,

Welcome to the forum. It's nice to be joined by another logical thinker.

13). ..... Could they all be part of the same mechanism?

ABSOLUTELY, in my honest and humble opinion.

Could one concept unite all of these questions into a general understanding of how the universe operates, and explain each and every question?

I think so. A couple of us use an Aether framework with absolute motion in our attempts. It was first proposed by our friend and memeber Dleviwing (who is a fellow scientist to you) some thirty years ago and after conceiving my own model which incorporated it, I learned of his and now spend a lot of time discussing it with him. There are also many other very interesting and plausible models here.

Would the proponents of string theories, dark matter, dark energy, multiple dimensions, multiple universes be able to admit that they are wrong?

Probably not; I don't agree with any of these either.


I need to look over the rest of your post some more before I make any more comments, but I look forward to any further exchange of ideas.

regards,

Tim

[PoPpAScience]

Hi joshua;

Could one concept unite all of these questions into a general understanding of how the universe operates, and explain each and every question?

I do believe that there is one concept that could answer all these, and right now I think that a member in here named Jimbo with his "Fuild Energy Threory" could answer with an arguement to most of the questions you asked.

What if the answer was yes, would the physics society of today be able to accept it? What if it wasn't a far out explaination, but a simple three dimensional explaination using observations of physical laws we all ready know. Would the proponents of string theories, dark matter, dark energy, multiple dimensions, multiple universes be able to admit that they are wrong?

I read somewhere, where some top mind said, that the physics society won't change, they just die, leaving room for new ideas to come in with the new blood.

In the year 1919, the Harvard Physics department conjectured that Gravity must be a by-product of the other forces.

Thats interesting to know, because that is my belief also, that Gravity is the by-product of the other forces. I have stated that premise in this forum lately. If you know of a link to that 1919 Harvard class's statement, I would enjoy looking at it.

As for me, I do not believe in an expanding universe, I see no evidence of a expanding universe, I see the opposite, a reciding universe. I do not have faith in the redshift.

[joshua]

Hi joshua;

I do believe that there is one concept that could answer all these, and right now I think that a member in here named Jimbo with his "Fuild Energy Threory" could answer with an arguement to most of the questions you asked.

I read somewhere, where some top mind said, that the physics society won't change, they just die, leaving room for new ideas to come in with the new blood.

Hello PoPpaScience,
I googled the 1919 book on the the state of electromagnitism in 1919 by the Harvard Physics dept. It was an on line free book and I believe page 252 was the page about the current state of gravity. It was many years ago after I wrote my paper copywritten on "gravitational wave synchronization" called "the framework to the theory of everything".

As for me, I do not believe in an expanding universe, I see no evidence of a expanding universe, I see the opposite, a reciding universe. I do not have faith in the redshift.[/QUOTE

I think you should look at the Current evidence and reasses you stance. In 1998 two independent labs confirmed using 6 years of Hubble telescope data that the galaxies furthest away are increasing there distance unit time per unit time. Goole an increasingly accelerating universe. The reseachers expected to be measuring a deaccelerating universe and predict the moment the universe changed to the big crunch. To science it was like throwing a tennis ball up in the air and measuring frame to frame to predict the deacceleration to the stopping point and finding out that the tennis ball is increasing in acceleration never to come back. Up till then I thought I was the crazy one because my understanding of gravitation actually predicted an increasingly accelerating universe and a flattening one too.

It was a while before I shared my understanding outside of a couple of hundred people that would listen. And still the resistance is amazing.
anyhow good luck in me changing your mind.

[PoPpAScience]

Hi Michael;

Up to a month ago I would have been very excited about your thoughts on “Gravitational Synchronization”, for it is a great way of explaining the reason for an expanding Universe. I won an award in this forum, on the monthly theme on the Expanding Universe, and in a chat we had about this theme I made the comment along the lines of, “could the flatting of the wave be responsible for expanding the Universe?”. Then I used the analogy of straightening out a snake, and how it makes it longer in length, well all I got was comic responses to my remakes about the snake. So, I have thought very hard on the expanding universe idea, but I just do not need it for my evolution of thought anymore. As long as we are using the measurement of light from a moving entity, taken from a moving platform, I just cannot accept the findings as absolute.

Now the decay of matter back into the Eather, thus creating the expansion of the local space, works for me. This could even act as a push Gravity as some have suggested in here. So even though I see where you are coming from with your theory and in the past would have enjoyed talking about your theory, I have since moved on from this train of thought.

Now I am in the mindset, that the wave-function is nothing more than the measuring of the oscillating nature of Vortices. For 15 years I could not reconcile the wave with what I see in my mind’s eye. Even though I always had the spinning of quarks in my mind, I did not think of Vortices until Vincent Wee-Foo and his “Universal Vortical Singularity”, triggered my mind to think of the Vortex as being at the centre of creating Mass, and thus Energy and Time.

I have an evolving thinking mind, and only state how I see things today. I will change my way of seeing things if the evidence warrants it. But the evidence has to be Logical.

Thanks for Google tip on the 1919 Harvard Class, I will have to read it.



"Framework to the theory of everything!" Spacetime may not be the true way to understand the relationship between the concepts of matter, energy, time, space and speed. Relativity is the point of origin mass to energy transfer between bound matter (potential energy) and unbound matter (kenetic energy) the Gravity wave ( space). That is to say that matter evaporates, decays, into the gravitational wave creating the resulting continuous actions of space, time and gravitational wave sychronization. Space is the gravitational wave being freed to its lowest form of matter. Time is the cosmological constant - the evaporation rate of matter. There is no real curved spacetime. It is gravitational wave sychronization, gravitational waves aligning through the path of least resistance that brings matter together, that is responsible time and space distortion as the waves elongate just as the dopler effect works in sounds. Instead of the sound wave being shortened or elongated when compared to moving objects the gravity wave is shortened or lengthened, red-blue shift which affects not the action of sound but the actions of time and space. Gravitational wave sychronization of bodies in motion change the relationship of the gravitational waves with respect to each other and the resulting actions of time and space change.Time and space are actions created by each discrete piece of matter as the matter evaporates into the gravitational wave. Space is the unfolding of matter. Time is the resulting action of the rate of evaporation of the gravitational wave. Relativity- Point of origin mass to energy transfer in wave form of bodies in motion Newton- Einstein- How it all works! "

C. Michael Turner

[joshua]

Hello to you,
You might want to revisit my understanding without worrying about what other people think. I have had a little rough water myself. Here is what the nature of monopole gravitational wave synchronization answers.
It answers an understanding of the big bang as related to a critical matter expansion of a build up of debinding matter, space then rapid decay.
It answers the reason for inflation, the initiation of slow decay once the three forces of nature formed and the gravitational wave became a byproduct of the other forces.
It answers why time and space are relative, why gravity works, why the laws of physics are reference frame dependent and why gravity and acceleration are two sides of the same coin.
Why inertia mass and gravitational mass are =.
Why the speed of light is constant.
Why light bends
Why black holes evaporate.
It predicts the shaping of the universe
It explains the reason motion exists.
It corrects space-time to a function of wave emission.
It explains how gravity is a continously synchronizing effect and not a pushing effect eliminating the need for dark energy and replaces it with Newton's Force=mass times acceleration where the is not a pulling force so relatively constant and as mass decreases then acceleration increases.
It explains through the gravitational wavelength why the effects of gravity don't exist in the quantum world.
It explains quantum teleportation and the nature of all matter.
It explains the gravitational constant and eliminates the need for dark matter to synchronize galaxies and explains what the misinterpretation of the data is.
It explains why the two/ three other forces can't relate with current directions in math.
I like your quote about Gallileo, as a matter of fact early in my understanding I was told that, "If your right then we have been wrong and wasted our lives, so you can not be right."
I have travelled from Naive to fully aware of how people treat people that they can not demonstrate an error in understanding.
I do appreciate your spending your time with me.
If you get around to rethinking your position as new info is available you have the knowhow to email me.

[joshua]

Hi Michael;

Up to a month ago I would have been very excited about your thoughts on “Gravitational Synchronization”, for it is a great way of explaining the reason for an expanding Universe. I won an award in this forum, on the monthly theme on the Expanding Universe, and in a chat we had about this theme I made the comment along the lines of, “could the flatting of the wave be responsible for expanding the Universe?”. Then I used the analogy of straightening out a snake, and how it makes it longer in length, well all I got was comic responses to my remakes about the snake. So, I have thought very hard on the expanding universe idea, but I just do not need it for my evolution of thought anymore. As long as we are using the measurement of light from a moving entity, taken from a moving platform, I just cannot accept the findings as absolute.

Now the decay of matter back into the Eather, thus creating the expansion of the local space, works for me. This could even act as a push Gravity as some have suggested in here. So even though I see where you are coming from with your theory and in the past would have enjoyed talking about your theory, I have since moved on from this train of thought.

Now I am in the mindset, that the wave-function is nothing more than the measuring of the oscillating nature of Vortices. For 15 years I could not reconcile the wave with what I see in my mind’s eye. Even though I always had the spinning of quarks in my mind, I did not think of Vortices until Vincent Wee-Foo and his “Universal Vortical Singularity”, triggered my mind to think of the Vortex as being at the centre of creating Mass, and thus Energy and Time.

I have an evolving thinking mind, and only state how I see things today. I will change my way of seeing things if the evidence warrants it. But the evidence has to be Logical.

Thanks for Google tip on the 1919 Harvard Class, I will have to read it.



"Framework to the theory of everything!" Spacetime may not be the true way to understand the relationship between the concepts of matter, energy, time, space and speed. Relativity is the point of origin mass to energy transfer between bound matter (potential energy) and unbound matter (kenetic energy) the Gravity wave ( space). That is to say that matter evaporates, decays, into the gravitational wave creating the resulting continuous actions of space, time and gravitational wave sychronization. Space is the gravitational wave being freed to its lowest form of matter. Time is the cosmological constant - the evaporation rate of matter. There is no real curved spacetime. It is gravitational wave sychronization, gravitational waves aligning through the path of least resistance that brings matter together, that is responsible time and space distortion as the waves elongate just as the dopler effect works in sounds. Instead of the sound wave being shortened or elongated when compared to moving objects the gravity wave is shortened or lengthened, red-blue shift which affects not the action of sound but the actions of time and space. Gravitational wave sychronization of bodies in motion change the relationship of the gravitational waves with respect to each other and the resulting actions of time and space change.Time and space are actions created by each discrete piece of matter as the matter evaporates into the gravitational wave. Space is the unfolding of matter. Time is the resulting action of the rate of evaporation of the gravitational wave. Relativity- Point of origin mass to energy transfer in wave form of bodies in motion Newton- Einstein- How it all works! "

C. Michael Turner

I reread you post today and you seem to misunderstand the nature of the increasingly expanding universe. You were describing flattening a wave (snake example) and asking if that is the reason the universe could be expanding and you were comically answered.

Point #1. I understand the universe as a Newtonian view, and Einstein's relativity working within that view. Einstein becomes sub-Newtonian. In other words Einstein's relativity works with in the big picture.

Point #2. The nature of the universe's increasing acceleration is Newtonian.
Now I claim that Gravitation IS NOT A PULLING FORCE, but a synchronizing force from all matter decaying into the gravitational wave. I DO NOT believe that the waves change. Intellectually applying the missing part of the Huygen's Principle, if the waves can't change and they align then the only solution is that the mass generating the waves changes in position. So you have an energy loss and a position change. ( Comically a lot like your zipper bringing your pants together, not a snake straightening ).

Point #3. In conclusion, if the force of the big bang has no pulling component and mass is losing energy to the synchronizing, but not changing wavelength, gravitational wave, then applying Newton's formula constant Force = decreasing Mass x increasing Acceleration applies. So the answer is simply F=M x A. Now the evidence is huge and when I say huge it is also comical because it predicts three actions that could be measured, one- is that the universe shouls be increasing in acceleration (overall), two- is the masses in the universe should be aligning along an expanding plane, and three- Black holes that have gobbled up all local matter, ie in some older galaxies, should be shrinking faster than they are growing. Generated gravitational wave synchronization also explains much more, the shape of galaxies, why galaxies do not behave all the same, ( ie no dark matter needed), etc.