String theory says Hawkins wrong on Blackhole

[Quantum]

The "Grand Unified Theory" is maybe more appropriate than the Theory of Everything, so here is another piece of my Grand Unified Theory as it relates to TOE.


Discover magazine has on display a magazine on display until June 30, 2008 called Discover Presents Top 75 Questions of Science. On page 12, Kaku states that as strings vibrate, they cause space and time to be warped around them, which to Kaku is equivalent to Einstein's view of gravity. I believe that strings that vibrate at higher frequencies (higher mass), then would wrap more space and time around them, which could be interpreted as greater warpage or curvature of space. I never thought about Kaku's version of how string theory accounts for gravity. I was thinking more in line of field lines, like circular field lines around the earth that grow thinner and thinner in number the farther they are from the mass of the earth, which causes objects to experience less gravity as there are fewer and fewer field lines (field strings), the farther they are from earth.

Using my guitar analogy, strumming a 12 string guitar versus a six string guitar will sum out a more energy-rich sound. Plucking one string at a time creates less energy than strumming over all of the strings of a guitar at once. Kaku's version is perfectly consistent with ours. The closer the strings are together, the more the curving of space per cube unit of space as the strings vibrate, due to the increased density of the vibrating strings, which results in the increased density of curling of space and time around the strings. Apparently, he has not made the connection yet between field lines and strings, which is the case of every string theorist as far as I know. We need to get our theory out before somebody else does.

Kaku states in the article string fever in the Discovery magazine that according to string theory, gravitational waves must have a particular frequency.

I believe this may solve the black hole problems that have plagued physicists for years. Brian Greene of Columbia University considers the resolution of the black hole problems with a theory that integrates general relativity with quantum theory as the "holy grail" of physics. You can get transcripts of the movie by searching Google for "Brian Green The Elegant Universe by NOVA."
I checked at Borders today in a book by Lisa Randall called "Warped Passages," in which she says that the higher the tension in a string, that is, the more resistant the string is to motion (the higher the inertia), the more readily the string will produce a high mass particle.

This is consistent with the way I see the situation. She is at Princeton University. She thinks the Higgs Particle is absolutely necessary in order for particles to have mass, just like all the other physicists. What is amazing is that she does not make the connection between how she talks about the tension of a string as inertia (she does not use the word inertia) with gravity. In most all the physics dictionaries, such as Oxford's Physics Dictionary, they state that mass is measured by an object's inertia, that is the tendency for an object to stay at rest if at rest or to stay in motion in the same direction with the same speed unless acted upon an opposing force.

The standard worldwide is to set an object in motion and have it collide with a platinum object of a given mass. The more the object resists a change in velocity, the more massive the object. Clearly, the amount of gravitational attraction that a body pulls on other objects is proportional to the body's mass, which is a measure of the body's inertia. Also, the amount of curvature or warpage a body imparts to the space-time continuum depends upon how much tension ("disturbance" as used in my previous writing) the body imparts to the "gravitional field lines (strings)" or the "quantum rubber," which increases the tension of the "space surface," or "space strings." Matter shapes the space surface it occupies, which then shapes the motion of the matter in the four-dimensional space-time continuum. We have the first string theory out that explains gravity without needing to use extra-dimensions, which offers a more elegant solution to explaining gravity.

With the answer to the black hole riddle, scientists will be better equipped to solve one of the most challenging problems in all of physics: tying together quantum theory, which rules the domain of the very small, and general relativity, the highly successful theory of gravity developed by Albert Einstein in 1915.

The theories have remained stubbornly estranged, although most scientists hold that the two ought to be intimately connected. Many researchers are convinced that delving into the abyss of black holes could lead to a unification of gravity and quantum theories.

Until now and the discovery of the Mccord theory of Universal Mass Charge and the QRSTU phenomenon(note 1).(See my article contained on this web page)

As the mass creates the “black hole” it stretches the string(s). The mass becomes smaller and more dense. When f (force) of the moving mass is neutralized by the tension on the string, the string ends close and the hole disappears. Hawkins is wrong. The black hole does not evaporate. It closes containing the energy(information).

More to come on what happens to the pinned up energy (information) when it returns back into the universe.

NOTE 1:Quantum, Relativity,String,Theory,Unified QRSTU as developed by R. Reese and J. McCord