Toe

[G_burnett]

Part four profiling verses prediction.

This is indeed a conflict. We predict from information received every motion we will do. We profile the all that is about us. We take a step knowing it will be a firm footing by our best guess. What if the information received went something like , we are on a pathway, it is firm from workers that made it, and in the next step we trip because the leaves had fallen over a dogs hole dug to bury a bone and the path was not safe?

The information was faulty and a mixture of truth and error. What then is the process of removing error … more observation to aid in the prediction and a profile expand of what was before us. Thus being a case in point that the path was with leaves and we were not walking on the path but the leaves, which in themselves will not give firm footing. We did not see the whole picture. We did not choose to see the leaves that would have changed the mindset of safeness because we ignored them as a factor in the profile picture we made on a prediction. Our best guess was flawed. It is not just being a more observant person but being with a more perfect mirror value that will be a solution. We did not take in the full truth but a mixture of truth and error to retrievable memory to make the prediction.

Think now, in a ponder, of a deer on the same path. He has four legs and with one with no firma terra information he would adjust where he was stepping. He did not need the best guess to be made to the extent and value we do as hue-persons. The only way we can improve our best guess prediction is in considerations of profiling which means we must have acceptable information and to get acceptable information we must throw out that which we are not made up of to receive it. One of which is vanity as an axiom to our foundations of self-being greater then what is before us. The other criticism self-criticism is acceptance of truth before self-examination of what wave is coming into our perception. Thus, to both event, no longer accept that which we will know intuitively and logically as wrong and never letting the wrong with the good get through. This is more or less comprisable to polishing the mirror.

Profiling the all is a most important aspect of our daily lives. Profiling the individual part of the all, the path that is not a path because of an absence in the path, keeping an open mind, no mindsets, can make a difference in really living or doing something less. Not getting to where you want to go is one result of something less. The prediction never works when you have a mindset based on both sides of the coin called self-awareness to a conscious prediction executed. Knowing ones-self as having two legs and not four is the sort of thing I am talking of.

The individual can call information received in form of wave wave awareness. The self-investigation of how the wave packet is affecting you is to design your own individuality, as a race of one and part of all hue-persons in our nature of exist.

In the above example of being at a party it should be noted that I am with the foundation of thought that all hue-persons have the same way of emotional expression of wave emit.

Love to one or hate to another is expressed in the hue-person no matter of the race culture or upbringing intuitively and instinctively outside of learning the emotion. Some make no matter and are removed in the polish of the mirror so these are not affected in the wave of emotion that may overtake the individual.

These lacking by choice or abnormality of a physical sense are easily noticeable in the individual as the hue-person might function.
The wave received from these can be indeed constructive or destructive.

[G_burnett]

Here kitty kitty kitty .... come through this little portal here ..heh heh

[labelwench]

Here kitty kitty kitty .... come through this little portal here ..heh heh

I'm guessing this is a male puppy by the blue collar.

Here's a song for Katrina. Yes, beware of those brown eyed handsome men, lol.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03OfD...eature=related

Kind Regards,

Anna

[G_burnett]

Ok sage … let us look at the Boise Einstein Chamber picture where the positron “supposedly” is coming out of the future.

That is really, inane, thought graham. I come back to the event point in a pigtail … let us call it what it is, a vortex.

What model can you use to describe the positron, a picture of an electron with determination of polar state being positive?

Let us look at the electron then … now we are getting somewhere.

Sage, Is an electron a changed state of a positron?

Alternatively graham, is the positron a changed state of the electron?

They are in the classical view separate standard units of charge and this makes the math easier that way. They cannot be separate even in wave ponder because when the come together … we know what happens. They share the same identity but they are in linear motion different.

They are in linear motion different because of the causal wave that set them in motion is different, can you follow my logic?

Ahhh… and if this is correct then it extends to the other dimension of measurement and that is size in relative compare to other particles, composite …but we will not go there yet. Just remember I have said it here first.

If there was a state of the electron or positron before being set in linear motion what was it. We have already seen the vortex so we must give the static state potential of having spin but not so much wave pulse as it would have in linear motion. If so, we would move up the particle line in size. ( Heh, heh.) insert verbal evil laugh).

This makes further interesting ponder from the axiom observation that both an electron and positron will disappear and reappear out of space-time.

They seem to have the ability or potential to collapse or expand the pulse observation and this can have only one reason in wave theory and the constructive or destructive event.

Thank you very much for the direction of ponder Dave.

Glad to see you are still reading a few if not all the threads in here to I hope is enjoyment of seeing some go down roads you have in you lustrous career in one of the more greater institutions of learning. Have I perhaps gone beyond those past roads? I hope I have not let you down in wave study. Sage likes you. You were not being paid for the direction yet you still gave it to me.

The pulse of the electron can only have one causal with no external motive force effect on the linear static unit. What can this be? The frequency of energy wave going in a circle around an axis as it will create a sudo perpendicular opposite axial wobble wave along the y axial plane in a direction.

This moves the space in pulse to a medium of observables if there was a medium smaller then the electron other then just the density of space/plasma. Note I have not used this word yet … it is the word torus. The key word in all of this the model presented here. The sudo axial core of the electron torus will exhibit the state of being positive.

Can the electron singularity be in such a state of no linear motion? Yes is can be in such a state in the natural but we have further created the same state to change the spin while we have held it in static state. We have changed the state back and forth repeatedly. We have taken a picture of the electron when this changed spin and how held.

The sudo core of a torus having boundaries of a shell by our vanity alone will show effect on varied motive energy applied dependent on the polar state forward of the motive wave.

However, this does not give model of a separate particle called the positron. The reason for this is the positron only exists dependent of the motive force wave given to the electron setting it in motion linear putting one polar state forward or the other for us to register as a state of the electron.

The paradox is that the electron and the positron both come out of nowhere in space-time.
The solution to this paradox is the way the positron and electron can by destructive and constructive wave; collapse/expand the electron or positron in linear motion still having pulse in the torus model. The magnetic field that contains the energy comes in sync with the circular motion in the tube of the torus and is no longer a containment by the circular motion but just linear and horizontal fields and the torus tube breaches to an inversion because with out the wobble there is only one of the fields in duty of containment. It turns inside out.

The coming out is the loss of sync of the sinusoid wave by oh! Oh! … “Linear frame drag,” On the other hand, other event of interaction such as my rule one of particle energy wave, interaction to a vortex degrades in dance during the event horizon. We cannot after all destroy or create energy.

I will give this on a white board to any requests of forum attend or presentation with applied math and supporting presented by other. ….


Work in progress from the above grade eight ponder to grade eighteen below.

[G_burnett]

Gravity

Observations are a packet of energy in varied state of collapse dances with other in an interaction that results in a loss of ability to do work and conjoins or collects the medium of transfer we call space/plasma content to a density increase by redirection and stopping of motion in relative motion of itself through space.

These elliptical paths affect other until we have a solar system of collected substance with a continued process until energy are perceived in four dimensional value as having state of mass. Varied in density by surface area of the ball circular exposed to space considered having the continued effect upon the structure will be compared to the split half ball of fission experiments initial shape. The split ball shape will be used in postulations to show the difference the surface area of a given structure radically changes observable effect of what is in the classical view of gravity.

Further, we can visualize gravity as a pull in effect but is by the initial process of formation of mass an ongoing continuing of the elliptical compression effect and sync orbital sinusoid wave axiom. This all not known in the time of Newton, considered and proven in Einstein observations of space time but has not had the math applied or visualised fully to the small that must prove true to both. The clarity of personal view will be exposed to the ruling out of gravity as a push in or a pull in event to function observed.

New developments in experiments to capture images of the electron and actual ionised shape showing pulse and spin allow for the comparison. Needed Solutions are to the electron unexplainable appearing out of space-time and disappearing, as does the positron, which will go beyond the classic view that the two are separate identities. Where both are observed in the same phenomena of an in and out of exist event, they demand going beyond the standard view to consider a solution to include they are both the same but in different state based on the causal of motion and pulse.

In this paper, the in small events considered and observed will agree with the postulations of the big in a visual pictorial of the electron having the same principles of applied math to coupling giving solutions to the problems of unexplained event in space-time of the positron and electron. The problem of clarity to why the positron seems to come out of advanced time and return in a vortex pigtail to point of accelerated particle smashing in the Boise Einstein vacuum chamber record of 19—will also be given a solution.

This will be supportive argument to change the classical view of a particle as mass or not mass by extended visual that will meet both evidentiary observations demand and both axiom postulations.

The visualization of time added to the problem of visualization of four dimensions in the geometric pictorial is given solution by the application first in logic of position consideration being changed by adding motive force causal of electromagnetic field principles either negative or positive in the examples given.

(Writers note. the italic will be cited and linked.)

[G_burnett]

Axiom one

Parameters
The first consideration axiom solution is to be the electron viewed in the static state of no linear motion in a given direction other then cyclic taking place, thus having position in state of exist.
It is further the acceptance of the classic view that the electromagnetic field created in the tubular torus model by the flow of energy around the axial and at a frequency based on the initial pulse causal along the y-axis by other. A singular pulse = a singular dimensional value “1”, of the electron. Further the speed of light a constant determinate of one cycle being equal to the speed of light in frequency independent of the radius.
Q. Where does this static state of the electron go when it disappears or winks out of exist in the space-time continuum to the creation in problem of clarity?
A.1. The energy increase of the electron increase in the orbit of the nucleus point “Z”, is in fact the increase of potential to effect by other by wave causal and transfer through the other medium. Each base unit value given that can be to the electron saying more then one electron is in orbit is the addition of a wave potential packet of energy to the static state of the electron. This is dependent on the electron having a nucleus structure as unless then held in place, the other potential wave causal that may tend to increase the dimension of value of the model has other function. This function can be destructive or constructive wave effect upon the held in place electron if the carrier of the force is a second electron. The y-plane becomes the visual of a y-axis with spin considered of the energy wave in the tubular EMF containment in motion around the y-plane.
Postulation to A.1
P.A.1. Dependent on the parameters of the holding being ready for the increase we could predict frequency increase of the tubular motion and expand of the torus along the x-plane. The increase in frequency that is of tubular fluid motion equal to the value then of ‘2’ in a constructive wave effect causal plus the motive force transferred to cyclic motion state of the electron, a pulsed transient electron in motion linear addition. This second transfer consideration would increase pulse amplitude (the height of the pulse along the y-axis) using a constant of light speed in the equation. This would degrade the relative value of amplitude in the reality, a paradox of consideration, thus as the radius was increased and not the speed of light constant ever increased, and give a visual of no increase in amplitude but a longer arc to the dimensions along the x-axis to the same amplitude.
P.A.2. Prediction considered, is the containment of the electron held in state to an increase of frequency and expand on the x-plane pulsing with the potential held at the speed of light a constant. Thus in of the pulse transfer at maximum potential reached any increase in the containment field holding the electron in place adding to the containment on the x-plane equally, would increase the rate of pulse taking the energy into a y-axial sync and release of wave potential to effect other along the y-plane with a value of one.
P.A.3. Further in this postulation should be for supporting of the axiom is prediction of impact dependency where uncertainty rules to where the impacted will have position of register. This solution to uncertainty comes with consideration thus of the pulse aptitude being an arc with an undividable zero z-point singularity extended on the y-axis. Or in the clarity point singularity = infinity value or in the Cartesian space dimension a razors edge of infinity sharpness subject only to transient frame drag as entropic constructive or destructive wave effect on the amplitude perpendicular to the direction of wave in the emit.
Solution and Conclusions to Axiom one problem
In the parameters of the held electron unit of charge being in stasis from linear movement and in that stasis position, not to be confused with the au’natural state, (Axiom two) the constructive wave applied from other causal is paradox in terminology. The given wave frequency around the torus, is a frequency of one cycle per turn or symmetry of motion in relative cyclic around the y-axial plane. For every cycle there is one field of containment circular of the tube creation thus losing a cycle of one by the constructive wave is losing containment to the equal value dimensioned. In the application to the parameters noted of the applied constructive wave it would have to be along the y-plane to meet the requirement of infinite-point-zero uncertainty effect, to give certainty effect, to the bowl structure of the torus pulse pseudo wobble considered.
Thus, the electron visualised as having no y-axis wobble and for the containment fields having both perpendicular and vertical containment-alignment-agreement symmetry, by being a frame-delayed structure needed to contain the flow, has freedom.
The electron releases energy in wave radiation transfer to the space-time continuum in a vortex degrade of wave along the y-axis determination and disappears from exist at the speed of light constant.

[G_burnett]

sorry all, didn't notice the spelling mistake ... the word Aptitude should be corrected to amplitude in P.A.3, second sentence

kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

Visuals [IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image002.jpg[/IMG]

Where we consider an electron held in state as above described,

And

Where the given visual is a sliced torus of the description,

And

Where t > 1, a cycle of energy in a dimension of time:

t = Pi (R^2) /2= amplitude (1.)

Alternatively, ½-wave pulse is the ½-frequency value in the given perimeter “t”.

Transferring the frequency of the wave in a cyclic motion of the held electron, we can see as pictured that in any given p1 the opposite side of the tube or containment boundaries we give will exhibit a quadrant variation p2.

Thus, remind be given now to the boundaries being only pictured as pseudo boundaries, the predictable event is one of a helix vortex creation. The polar state in the entry of wave front opposite to the negative state of wave and a central core “z” of positive state predictable to any entry of state from other wave emit effecting as the sine wave is not just spinning around the y-axial but will exhibit tubular variation of quadrant position.

This variation set [p1 -> p2] in a value of one frequency of spin in orbital is with the constant standard of at the speed of light divided by 2. Thus expand of the orbit on the x-axis is not predictable other then in repetitive wave or cosine value being given. Expand of the electron on the y-axis is predictable. (See axiom 2)

Visual two[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image004.jpg[/IMG]

[G_burnett]

I do not like the visual two and will modify it to a singular direction of ponder where the wave set singularity of a packet + or - will have the singularity of direction on the y-axis.

this is in consideration that the effecting wave on the x-axis would simply turn to effect along the y-axis the subject of effect in this case in point the electron torus model.

I am amazed and thus tardy in my continual posting here that the causal of pulse is not considered more in the examine of the torus. I have thus been just amazed to apply the model presented to so much of late that I find myself at a loss of words to start posting. Where should i start?

I will continue with the axiom two post with visual modification (work in process remind) to the electron not in a held state.

Feynman's wave is everywhere may be incorrect in the measure of the free electron time dimension of exist un effected by wave to a cosine construct and loss of containment ability.

Kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

Authors notes;

Key words in the Axiom one above should be "held state", and measure of the flow in the tube at "the constant c", which in such dimension of measure possible by todays standard available would to all visual representation maintain a torus shape but still have the wobble and thus shown by the quadrant slice view.

The supporting visuals in the big are numerous to cite. The main area to view in research would be the effect after the loss of containment where the twist of the torus develops from two circles of remnant re containment of substance and looking very much like a Mobius structure when the two circles reconnect on perpendicular planes even.

Kind regards graham.