Toe

[G_burnett]

i have downloaded the paper from the link you gave Lloyde and on page two stopped reading for the simple but then bored continued a bit more that indeed found interesting but i can not read for two years the study he has done to comment the full reply. ... there is still no marry of QT to Relativity other then with les then all the facts. Feynman came close to the idea i have but to failed other by his postulations will prove my point of objectivity. ... as you may read the Toronic pictorial you may get the idea as i am staying out of the actual aplications potential ... lol or trying to as sage just told me. .. kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

what comes last in the electron electron conjuction and transfer ... muon photon or electron?

[G_burnett]

i would not answer that question either ...

[Penz2nz]

Please forgive the intrusion but as I began reading the early posts I was fascinated by the scale of the hex cloud over Saturn's pole and could not resist bringing the comments to visual life.

[G_burnett]

thank you for he post and welcome to the Forum

I have it solved but it is a supporting geometric reality of another who gave a presentation to the UN as a nasa rep back in 72 i found out but was not i think fully accepted the causal.

My reality to the triangled two forces at play was drawn up befor i researched his presintation so i have been reluctent to say i solved it but more that i can prove his theory of two three cusp collection points in a hex conjunction based on density an composition at that level ... I should finish my paper on it but i am kind of hung up on the universal planck causal of pulse in a toronic structure given a y-axial declination and freedom of a free radical spin at the constant light value everywhere at once to a point forward regester ... hmm ok guess i am blabing here a bit after a nice long day at the lake with my rod and dog and a new working formula now for the trout that just could not get enough of my little fly ... now there was so many i gave a half doz away cause i did not want to clean them lol .. only little ones about three lbs each though.

feel free to comment as you may, i get on here at varied less times then i did till i get a new comp of my own again so i wil lthough sometimes late get back to you.

kind regards graham

[austintorn@aol.com]

…I should finish my paper on it but i am kind of hung up on the universal planck causal of pulse…

And also hung up and over on and from the elixir of the gods drinks.

[G_burnett]

And also hung up and over on and from the elixir of the gods drinks.

ahh yea, i love you too austin, pink leotards or not you are the ignigma of this site at times. .. or was that iguama ... hmmm sorry brain is so foggy yet from last week ..

i would venture to say a whole chapter of my book has to be on vanity measure given to any dimension made. It should be a pre requisite to any thought in science theory IMOH ... but then i am not a formal paper holder and wing it on my own logic and excuses ..

you may quote me on that one .. hee hee ..

take care, kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

Have i posted on gravity lately here?

I forget.

Ok

here goes again maybe ...
Gravity
Work in progress

Observations are a packet of energy in varied state of collapse dances with other in an interaction that results in a loss of ability to do work and conjoins or collects the medium of transfer we call space or plasma content to a density increase by redirection and stopping of motion in relative motion of itself through space.

These elliptical paths affect other until we have a solar system of collected substance with a continued process until energy are perceived in four dimensional value as having state of mass. Varied in density by surface area of the ball circular exposed to space considered having the continued effect upon the structure will be compared to the split half ball of fission experiments initial shape. The split ball shape will be used in postulations to show the difference the surface area of a given structure radically changes observable effect of what is in the classical view of gravity.

Further, we can visualize gravity as a pull in effect but is by the initial process of formation of mass an ongoing continuing of the elliptical compression effect and sync orbital sinusoid wave axiom. This all not known in the time of Newton, considered and proven in Einstein observations of space time but has not had the math applied or visualised fully to the small that must prove true to both. The clarity of personal view will be exposed to the ruling out of gravity as a push in or a pull in event to function observed.

New developments in experiments to capture images of the electron and actual ionised shape showing pulse and spin allow for the comparison. Needed Solutions are to the electron unexplainable appearing out of space-time and disappearing, as does the positron, which will go beyond the classic view that the two are separate identities. Where both are observed in the same phenomena of an in and out of exist event, they demand going beyond the standard view to consider a solution to include they are both the same but in different state based on the causal of motion and pulse.

In this paper, the small events considered and observed will agree with the postulations of the big in a visual pictorial of the electron having the same principles of applied math to coupling giving solutions to the problems of unexplained event in space-time of the positron and electron. The problem of clarity to why the positron seems to come out of advanced time and return in a vortex pigtail to point of accelerated particle smashing in the Boise Einstein vacuum chamber record of 19—will also be given a solution. This will be supportive argument to change the classical view of a particle as mass or not mass by extended visual that will meet both evidentiary observations demand and both axiom postulations.

The visualization of time added to the problem of visualization of four dimensions in the geometric pictorial is given solution by the application first in logic of position consideration being changed by adding motive force causal of electromagnetic field principles either negative or positive in the examples given.

The Einstein General Theory of Relativity did not consider gravity as a force but as an event around a black hole or holding point inward axis of the inverted y function declination in frame drag toronic structure having the shell forward effect able point singularity in it duality of two polar states and further of the ponder to proximity event.

if not to clear ... it will be IMHO ... kind regards graham

[labelwench]

Am I to understand that we have overcome gravity in sending people to space, yet we really do not understand it's cause?

That we can measure the force it exerts without knowing the cause of that force?

Excuse my lack of background. This is an honestly asked question.

[G_burnett]

Am I to understand that we have overcome gravity in sending people to space, yet we really do not understand it's cause?

That we can measure the force it exerts without knowing the cause of that force?

Excuse my lack of background. This is an honestly asked question.

I think you have a good background .... we do not know the cause just the observation of an event that begins in the creation of substance by conjoin of wave structure ... which most do not understand either ... lead to gold sort of thing ... i think we have done that now? hmmm basic anna we deal with the reality observation not the causal yet ... this is the difference in subjectivity and objectivity reason and arguement of direction to take in either science or meta.

to understand gravity perhaps the most interesting question to begin with is why do we not have square planets? ... a thread that would be given to much posting my belief ... if fission would be a gentlemans topic which it would not be in an open forum i would gladly start it despite the side line of thoughts that may arise.

it may lead to the different varients of the carbon atom being created too so that would have to be a no no of the discussion ... hmm guess it may not be a good forum after all as it would knock the value out of diamonds ....

the good benifit would be surfing interests would increase perhaps with all the wave talk ... sage would like that.


how does a quark wave composite form?


what contains it best?


what gets the quarks moving?

there are a few thoughts to think of ... kind regards graham