Toe

[G_burnett]

The superfluid model would certainly lead to the onset of quantum chaos.

In this revisit you have certainly given me with this post much to ponder in the super fluid model.

I can only think of this model as being a surprise to the sand in water mix and salt in water dissolve possible to variations of what the "sand" or "salt" might be.

And though there is much discern over the sand in water picture ... the super fluidity state to such has been found to include this scenario with atoms. Memory serving me right to reading it and postulating with out the citation. ...

Yes many surprises.


Back to Saturn for a moment Greg, The picture link in the ultra violet now that I have been postulating the the duel pole spin to conjunction. The picture shows an offset center of the hex to the clouds which would indicate a conjunction veritable to the planetary orb core axial and supportive to the particle composite being effected to major effect in the MF axial, not so much the magnetic field axial moving but the planetary axial of composite varied to conjunction with the MF ...

Kind regards G

[G_burnett]

Hi "Joe the Plumber" of manifolds and woman folds of outside in and inside out…

"TOE The Plumber" sure left a mess of stuff for us to figure out. What pipe dream was He smoking?

Ty Austin

I must give credit for the animation of ponder by a fellow I have yet to track down but is somewhere in the Valley with an interest in old films Mexican American. ...probably in a government hush hush position where he got one out and went under the blanket or is now working in a car wash or installing toilets ... the "pipe" dream analogy is right on, not wasted on me, Ty for the post. the female anatomy I can not comment on being singular celibate for to long to remember such things of belly buttons but will explore mine tonight ... kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham,

It does seems the theory of everything can come from geometry platform.
.......

For the outer vortex rings of this tri-core polar vortex, its tri-core effect dilates gradually and therefore is vortically diffused in an outward circular manner and the edges thus fades away.

An enlarged image on the polar region of Saturn as shown below has revealed that this is factually a tri-core polar vortex; this categorically has explained the vortical dynamics that render the external hexagonal-like vortex structure. The dilated tri-core polar vortex has regressed in an outer vortex ring and therefore mirrored an opposite pair of tri-core vortex that interlocks as a hexagonal-like vortex; the hexagonal-like vortical structure is formed by two interlocking harmonics of tri-core vortex in opposite angular phase through a tri-pole precession. The vortical dynamics is similar to the tri-core Arctic polar vortex illustrated above.




I agree that other theorem can be congruent for a same observations and could account for more details. What being suggested is a comprehensive way to analyze vortical vectoring through geometrical modeling as an alternative approach, and it does seems workable and has unexpected resolving capability.

Its just my offbeat drumming, lol.

With peace for a ToE.

Hi Vincent

the tri pole effect is indeed there but maybe not as we jump into the picture to percieve the qualification ... there are three forces in the geometric dimension ... Sol MF, Planetary MF, and GF ... in thus said I agree there is a tri pole effect to a tri vortex conjunction ... and not to say there is naught other effect in the expand of "lines" outside of conjunction event.

The other vortex or eyes in the singularity and being still part of the whole as pointers to cause. Some as satellite in nature if composite density irregularities the example or variations of the other forces but not taking from the whole effect having manifested.

We could only expect the variations in the expanse of the actual 4 earth size of the hex on this gas giant mistakingly said to be three earth size by me in my excitement.

Yes too I agree that Einstein vortex event was the first postulation to expand into the geometry dimensions of quanta measure and other dimensional quanta of crystallization effect. As we look further in to the Hydrogen and Helium Ion attachment variations to weight of composite and levels in the atmosphere, the flattening of the polar areas become more understanding to a MF predominate pulse with spin and curvature effect on conjunction local an the hex being able to maintain it shape in rotation resonant effect.

Probably less clear now dumping my train of thought as it comes around the corner lol g.

[G_burnett]

here Greg, just for you



enjoy! kind regards Graham

[G_burnett]

As an after thought to the above picture all, there is a notable variation proving to the three cusp triangles having opposite spin if you note the arms of the vortex show the vortex's are rotating in different direction dependent on the extend of the sides of the triangles to the opposite spinning cusp point of the second triangle. The forces can be better understood by this. Look just inside the hex at five and again at seven for the reverse of vortex spin?

Kind regards G.

[G_burnett]

Hi all

I am setting up a web site in spaces, work in progress is the Saturn Hex and will add to it more and more. Feel free to coment on it if of interest to any.

Kind Regards Graham
http://grahampeterburnett.spaces.live.com/default.aspx

[G_burnett]

..... in going to this site researching res shift and trying the full PDF link I was told my computer address is on a no view list and was shut out??? Have you ever heard the likes? Usually it says you need to have certain clearance or be part of this or that group ... not "you are on a list" sort of garbage.

http://gita.grainger.uiuc.edu/iop/Jo...rtnum=003&lang=

If indeed being the case then I am probably very close to something in my ponders some where of something has rankled someone and will have access through other portals my dad had through boeings or maybe ... no I wont say that portal ... now, ... just to see what it is I have touched on .... any one with access who would want to help out here it would be acceptable to copy an paste the artical maybe? ... who would put little oh me on a list?

Interesting, very interesting.

TY, who ever. Try offering me money next time? lol

Graham

[G_burnett]

In the empathic nature of responding particle form I am happy to postulate this ongoing paper on the Saturn Hex for comments and reply.

December 03
the saturn effect rev

This is a work in progress, all rights reserved, usage allowed of any content for educational purpose only with citation of author given and not used for profit of any sort or other recognition thereof.

The Saturn Effect


By Graham Burnett


7-633 Upland Drive


Campbell River BC Canada V9W 2A7

Introduction

Some years ago, a joint multi group project under NASA saw the Voyager space probe launch to explore our solar system, which included a fly by eventually of the planet Saturn. Photographs taken and sent back to Earth to the surprise content of a near perfect hexagram (six-sided_ formation) formed of the clouds on the north polar region of the planet. This gaseous planet anomaly formation is such a large formation; three earths could fit inside of it. To this date there has been one other probe sent into space when to reach Saturn to review the formation on a further flyby the probe Cassini found the hex still there.

The following picture is of the hexagram with a link of source for the full animation of the event.

[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image002.jpg[/IMG]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn#Orbit_and_rotation

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Reusing_content_outside_Wikimedia

In this paper to explain the formation I will lead the reader first through elementary geometry with reference to crystal habit later of varied components in the atmosphere, alignment to formation and second to the creation of six cusps of a hexagram by magnetic effect on composition suspended and at the same time of suspend the particles affected by inverse paradox view allowed gravity effect as a push in event with drag on the composite by the planet itself.

This concept of gravity in this push in effect view in geometric pictorial on the atmosphere can be described better as follows;

1. “The magnetic field (MF) effect is with a spin other then the spin of the planet MF.”

2. “The composite in polar alignment suffers a frame drag effect.”

There will a final support of theorem in description of the southern pull, which in other effect of negative Magnetic Field event has vertical vortices effect of no hexagram.

"Thus so postulated is a hex formation from a bi-pole two point zero creation of a cone vortex in linear reverse direction to each other picturable along a vertical axial near perfect conjunction with each other in time of spin."

The two vortex creation are both in the spin turning the same way but one with frame drag giving two notable 3 plane effect of clumping cusp effect. Opposite in nature of perspective the view they have come together on the same axial to conjunctive resonant local on the (y) vertical. This is done with dimensional particle form of atmospheric density in transient motion affected and in dimensional spin from the frame drag effect created in lower planetary spin and drift there in to the conjunction to a formation of a hexagram pictorial.
The core mass of the planet spinning in one direction drags the atmosphere into bands behind the force; this is a drag event by the spin of the planet mass.

The MF created is the center of the core having electromagnetic event is spinning slower then the crust composite that extends to density factors of the surface. These are molecules of frozen compacted substance of mass and in the spin created by this turned on core, is opposite to the spin of the planet compared to Earth for the example in both relative to Sol.

The push in effect of gravity view has been with examination of the fine work of Vincent Wee-Foo, who I have asked to share this paper in his descriptive of effect in view found at his site of vortex creation.

http://www.singularvortex.com/index.htm

[G_burnett]

Part One.

“Any effect of the spin of the core in regards to GF drag of mass in less dense composition is in advance of the MF effect on the mass.”

To the understanding of geometric shapes having six cusps or points and being maintained in composite nature of the atmosphere there is the formula as follows to consider. A special plane curve can be generated by the trace of a fixed point on a small circle that rolls within a larger circle.

Giving the smaller circle the radius r, and the larger circle has a radius described as

R = kr, then the parametric equations for the plane curve can be given by :

X(\theta) = r (k-1) \ left (\cos\theta + \frac{\cos((k-1)\theta)}{k-1}\right),

Y(\theta) = r (k-1) \ left (\sine\theta - \frac{\sine((k-1)\theta)}{k-1}\right).

In Cartesian space we have to let k = 6, for 6 cusps being then created, to form the hexagram shape with vortices’ spin considerations.

The number 6 = 6/1 is an integer.

As such the formation of 6 cusps plane curves will result with 6 cusps being created by the formula applied.

On the south pole (k) can be given a value equal to an irrational number with a combined inward direction of vector spin and the paradox of being empty, no hex formation, a vortex more common with two inward forces.

This is the nature of the term Hypocycloid and the above formula to bother some of he numbers to it.

It does not take away from the added fact of the formation in spin and magnetic field effect on the composite molecular particle form in less dense form as nor did other postulate featured effect such as Sol emit and Jupiter tail emersion, both for enrichment of charge of particles in suspend.

Where the hexagram is in the upper atmosphere in a state or dimension of view so far a distance from the core along the axial of spins, the magnetic field effect not restricted by the drag friction, is actually a paradox view creation in advance of the gravity effect.

Revisiting the animated space pictorial above we see two notable vortex eyes at two o’clock and at twelve o’clock out side the hex and inside the hex formation respectively that are turning in reverse spin getting closer to each other in the final frames of the animation sequence.

This is indicative of a frame-drag drift event by cumuliform non-uniform frequency of wave in bi- pole vortex spin event.

We can also note in the showing of the aurora pictorial of the planet picture, the singular tail of vortex event in varied vortex event within the hex both inside the hex at predominate locations attachable to the extend of the plane to arc.

[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image002.jpg[/IMG]

So seen in this picture the location of the vortex where to the extend in each of the two triangles arcs to the cusp or the other triangulated side, explained below, there is clear reverse of spin being shown to each of the six planes extend of these vortices. This is showing there are two three sided triangulated reverse effects taking place with frame drag event in process between the two three sided triangles.

It is at that point of view recorded by the NASA probe programs where composite of the atmosphere conjoins in an event to form a hex, one force just far enough ahead of the other, then effecting the spin of composite.

The two forces are magnetic field flux in directional dimension linear along the Y axis with perpendicular spin, and prospectively gravity force in effect on the particles perpendicular with spin vertical to the core. The particles are in spin by the gravitational drag of the core on the particles and alignment by the MF polar effect with direction.

The Sol emit add to the potential of effect of the MF on the particles as further does the immersion of the planet in the helix tail of Jupiter.

It is at this point of pictorial where there is the hex, on the south pole designation, where density becomes the factor of allowable build up from drag on the horizontal plane, the forces can no longer be effect because of the density of the atmospheric composite reaching maximum potential of density. This creates a cusp or event horizon to a holding pattern and rebuild or re-clumping to the next cusp.

The next cusp is created then a proceeding event but with a difference. This next cusp is not from the prior event forces then rebuilding but from the secondary force in the reverse spin effect. The cusp number two is in the same density factor of composite limitations or parameters at that height and density being in exist and making an equal length cusp point.

Noticeable now is the cusp creations as having the different arm extend either in the hex or out of the hex from the cusp point depending on which force dependent cusp you started your view. You can take your choice of what force to start with.

Create the outer arms from the three cusps showing from the GF effect as they are in the hex MF limiting drag effect and the MF arms out of the Hex as loss of MF effect from directional effect.

It is only because of the density of composite in polar alignment being in spin that the arms of the composite form to the notable gravity effect. Such too in saying this are the sides of the hex between the cusps, an extended arc each from the individual triangular sides of the two triangles to the other force making the triangle cusp point.

The Forces on the material both GF and MF event where the material is being pushed to a cusp can only support so much of the event with so much force and the material fans out in the arms from each cusp to alternative directions on the x plane set depending on point of view begin.

"The cusp point is a build up of particles caused by the effect of GF and MF. "

[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image003.jpg[/IMG]

[G_burnett]

[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image001.jpg[/IMG]

This postulated is remembering the clear view of two triangles with three cusps each per effect. Why this triangle effect is taking place, is the most obvious question that arises.

[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image002.jpg[/IMG]

The answer in the simple is because of the density of atmospheric composite in the parameters of a flattened pole of substance. If for example the density were less at that point of conjunction of forces the Mf constant parameters would fail the event. The GF effect would not build up enough substance in drag in the parameters of the MF effect of polarization.

[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image003.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GRAHAM~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image004.jpg[/IMG]