Baud,

If you'll take my axioms and descriptions above and imagine the particles I refer to as quantum resolutions of a fluid Aether, with the properties defined by Dave (i.e. absolute motion and self-affinity) and imagine the reference to space as an expandable membrane resolution at which the affinity/bonding takes place, thus the particles are the quantum resolutions at which the absolute motion takes place, it will even make my initial axioms a bit clearer (though admittingly not completely clear), whereby temperature is defined in terms of degrees of freedom, which would be a representation of the expansion of the Aether.

The virtual particles (i.e. matter and anti-matter) along with our entire material universe would be manifest from this Aether at the absolute scale due to the algorithm of a Fundamental Substance (i.e. Aether) operating by means of its property of absolute motion directed by the parameters established by its other property of self-affinity, whereby our assymetrical universe is formed through time (a.k.a. elapsed motion)

Initially I didn't acknowledge self-affinity or the angular momentum it caused, which allowed for autonomous matter to be constructed within the Aether; thus my framework lacked much needed direction among other things; but after a few lessons, I realized the importance of them both, and the importance of maintaining the conservation of absolute motion, by means of recognizing its conversion from random/chaotic, which causes spatial expansion due to the destructive interference of the bonding property, to uniform (e.g. linear, angular, and vibration), which is constructive to bonding.

Mass is thus a measurement of the uniform motion of an autonomous volume, and being as the temperature scale is a measurement of degrees of freedom, the initial universal state of absolute uniform linear motion (thus absolute linear velocity/absolute mass/zero instances of internal relative time/absolutely condensed) before the initial event/bang/collision was therefore a state of absolute zero temperature (one degree of freedom) and time was also at its absolute state, with the only reference to change being external to the void through which the FS linearly propagated, which I might add would also be comparative to an absolute rest state if there are no other volumes of FS within the void; thus nothing to establish relative motion to our universal volume of FS; thus the only motion that matters is when the FS is in a chaotic state whereby volumes are accelerating each other by means of the internal motions that give rise to internal relative time.

The strong and weak force, along with gravity are all interactions manifest due to the flow established by the spatial aether being condensed and continuously converted through structured matter as the universe tries to regain its initial absolute state, and electromagnetism is the reverse of this process whereby spatial aether expands from structured matter which is seen as EM waves propagating throughout the whole; communicating the current state of all.

This view is similar to your view of spatial displacement causing gravity, but the flow of spatial aether into structured matter also plays into it, whereby effecting the increase in spatial density around massive objects.

I think you'll find that I'm not arguing with the condensing spatial dimensions of Einstein's clock, which allowed for his time/clock dilation, and linear acceleration of an object also condenses it in all directions, not just in the direction of propagation; thus increasing it's uniform motion; thus also its mass.

Our entire universal system is in a state of forming stuctures to the point of instability due to the relative density of their surrounding spatial medium, whereby replicating to further structure formation (as seen by the constituents of the atomic model along with our periodic table), as spatial densities increase along with furthering structural complexity, all the way to the point that you and I are formed from these fundamental interactions, and are having this conversation, feeling that we are seperated by abstract concepts such as emotion and thought, but are actually only seperated by measurements such as density and proximity, which is changing at so many resolutions at this stage that seemingly simple fundamental interactions manifest complexities such as life.

It would seem Darwin's evolution pertains to more than just the resolution at which we find life, as the entire universe is in constant evolution from the autonomous structures it forms at the atomic micro scale, through their arrangements at the galactic macro scale, all the way to the complex structures it continuously forms at the scale of life.

As I've stated, much of this I've recently learned, and some are only my interpretations. Any flaw presented here is a representation of my failure as a student, and does not represent the failure of others as teachers.

Regards,

Tim