dimension crossing?

[AntonioLao]

when did the universe traverse dimension? Say from 0D to 3D. Is the universe 0D at the beginning? Is it 4D now?

Are human thoughts and consciousness crossing dimension constantly? While human physical forms remain in 3D with only increase in physical volume from embryo to adult form? Where are the 50 feet tall humans? What physical laws limit physical growths? Can mental growths be so limited as well? Is there an upper bound to intelligence?

[Guille]

here you are dealing with two completely different things.

refering to the one about limitation, it is not a matter of growth, but a matter of evolution. There IS as limir ro human capacity, and it is, a limit different for each person, his/her's limit and highes IQ. if we speak about limit including evolution, this does not exist. evolution is life. life is nature. nature is everything. everything is at the top. so if someone can explain why there is no limitation to evolution, it might be a TOE. or atleast a biology TOE.

I am going now so I will post about the other theme and in the other threads later today.

[AntonioLao]

when somebody is thinking, how many dimensions is being crossed? In any case, the person still can only express all the thoughts in less than or equal to 4 dimensions. Can there be direct communication between two persons by thoughts as in mental telepathy?

Did the physical dimension of the universe starts at zero? what is its dimension today?

[Guille]

ok, I will start stating that telechinesis or mental comunication IS (FACT) possible. Many scinetists work on this and other research about our brains and minds, this is, because they are very misterious, and that is why, if you think about it, it is the only common study of all natural sciences.

ok, this is what many scientists believe, not my own thoughts: the minds or brains don't work in espacial dimensions, it is only temporal dimensional (and they are even discussing THAT). our memories for example, don't have a space that when it gets filled it just stops, you can emorize and memorize and memorize as much as you want. this obviously only happens until your intelligence can manage. so for me there are no dimensional thoughts, although there are thoughts about dimensions. (the <<<GUILLE>>> paradox ).

the universe indeed had no dimensions at the begining. this is also a subject I hope to deal with in the next chat session. actually the dimensional evolution is the only thing human mind can't or are more limited in thinking about. even if you think that you can visualize and accept time being a fourth dimension, you are wrong, it is impossible. this is because we are used to this three dimensions, these six directions (3 opp. to 3). I don't really think thaat it was a peculial thing to happen. although yes, because as what you said in another post somewhere in the forum, a universe with less or more dimensions wouldn't be able to exist. why three, or better said, four dimensions? I can't tell. but I believe in string theory and it states that the four dimensions we talk about are the only expanded dimensions. there are ten in total, or 11 already. even the f theory has two time dimensions.

if we can't even imagen time as a dimension, how on earth are we going to imagen several temporal dimensions?

[AntonioLao]

when we analyze the concept of time, it is unavoidable that we also need to analyze the concept of length (distance, geodesic, etc). So that the ratio of time over length is defined as the inverse of velocity (vector definition) and inverse of speed (scalar definition).

When crossing dimension, say from 2D to 3D, the length contracts, while time dilates. So our 3D length is actually shorter in 4D, while our time of 1 second is dilated into a million years in higher dimension.

the probability of being able to cross dimension is given by the powers of the ratio of time over length. This example can be seen in Einstein's [math]E=mc^2[/math]. For matter (4D) to become energy (3D), the proportionality constant of square of light speed is need but for continuous space (S) the proportionality constant is just c as in [math]S=cE[/math]

[Guille]

aha, I understand.

what if we then think about zero dimensions? if you cane xplain, we might be able to get somewhere in the dimenisonal evolution...

[AntonioLao]

what if we then think about zero dimensions?

So, we can say that for objects of zero length, their times are dilated to infinity. Since speed is the ratio of length over time, the object remains at rest for all eternity.

[Guille]

So, we can say that for objects of zero length, their times are dilated to infinity. Since speed is the ratio of length over time, the object remains at rest for all eternity.

well there you have it, write?

you were trying to demostrate in the reality of motion thread that the universe has zeor momentum. if the universe was a singularity, and it most probably is/was, then it had zero dimensions, so it had eternal rest, so it has no linear momentum.

[AntonioLao]

then it had zero dimensions

Actually, zero length implies infinite spatial dimension. The length in 4D is shorter than that in 3D, the length in 5D is shorter than in 4D, ad infinitum...

[Guille]

oooh, well, I'm going to look at your last post as neutral.

negative: it sort of dis-prove my no-linear-momentum-of-the-universe-demostration.

positive: it does help a lot in my works in solving Zeno's paradox, in which I wok more and more these days.