Paradox of Potential popped Aware

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Allen,

Has reworded some terms in the updated version for "Conceptual Framework of Nature".

In a classical platform from this standpoint, a review is made on spacetime of general relatively in a UVS topic on time dilation.

The topics on UVS clarifies the concept of gravity is also fortified on this classical platform.

It does appear to me that vortical motion in a classical platform can explicitly clear the mystic clouds of modern physics that are based on GR's spacetime.

Any comment and feedback is most welcomed.

Best regards,

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham,

Attempting to comprehend quantum spin in a delusion and try to make logical sense out of it can lead to insanity indeed.

Not conclusively cut out yet on the writeup for quantum spin, one introduced entity in the issue leads to more questions and this has went on and on for my ponders at the moment.

Konwing the issue intuitively is one issue, expressing it analytically with explicit logical descriptions is another issue. Darn! . I desperately need you quote on "if you know what I mean please explain it to me.." for this. LOL .

Nevertheless, has done up a topic on "Visualization of differential rotation with Foucault's pendulum". IMO this would knock out Coriolis effect completely.

Enjoy.

Kind regards,

Yes Vincent

It all goes back to the shape, on the quanta level, so as then being determined, for a point of view. Not so much the delusional but more ... without determinism of state that QM will not give, exactly.

The infinity of shape demands the model be determined as all will reflect it. It has to include spinier state and pulse in frequency determined and boundaries of not external effect so much maybe but internal interaction boundary.

It is the establishment of "Rule of law." First.

This is not QM.

The potential is an "infinite variation to infinite velocity" of the quark, that will refuse smashing aside, to naturally come apart other then in a vortex model of Em forces .. IMHO my rule one pictorial for the simple, that turns out not to simple lol. ...that was a mouthful to say.

"nevertheless" has indeed done up a good topic to my brief read that i will redo a bit later today.

I am a picture thinker and i see things that I try to describe and hope someone can under stand the art work when i put it down and tell me what i mean .. lol something like that.

...take care, grab a steam and a whirlpool and let the whittle bubbles tear your stress away.

Kind regards ~ g.

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent and all

Spin has been described as varied movement that will not effect the events but paradox is that the spin does effect substance in varied manner due to the cause of spin force.

when direction is given a magnetic polar state the emit is not so much the magnetic moment point singularity but the whole curvature dome of the emit that demands attention as a dome as direction both on the linear and the vertical expect of direction.

This manifests in a current carrying wire to the right hand rule and angled vector of field... with what I believe is a charge forward in motion from the substance of the wire on the atomic.

most animations of magnetic fields spinning are giving the field potential of magnetic moment in progressive change to other potential magnetic moment.

there are other more realistic views that must be considered to functional use.

In spin the vortex view i am finding has led me to the conceptual of other view and can not explain it yet here less i get screwed in things i am doing experiments on.

Will possibly chat you up on the PM soon.

kind regards Graham