The Moving Toe

[Profpat]

hi pat
I thought it should have a "real" substance as well and was not sure, I had never realized the need of a non moving fundamental substance

I think that as you go very deep inside an atom, the space that has been compressed with motion still there will have the strength probably be close to that of a black hole (pound for pound) and whatever strange effects are present in a black hole will be present in an atom deep inside
as we work our way out of an atom we will have space folding all the way out like that of the black hole

... so I believe particles like that exist but did the pressure of space folding and motion create them at the beginning?
it could be the other way around however I still see them as motion being encapsulated by space.

Hi Idibart;

I see them as motion being encapsulated by space also. These would be the quarks which, according to my An Idea, is the energy within a looped string. And of course, the proton and neutron ( the "real" 3D particles) are made up of 3 quarks.

So for the most part our, according to my theory, reality is mostly moving space, dancing to the music from a 3 string instrument.

And from those 3 one dimensional Planck Length strings comes our entire visible universe.

Here is where my beautiful daughter would ask me: " Where do the 3 strings come from Dad?"

[ldibart]

Hi Idibart;

I see them as motion being encapsulated by space also. These would be the quarks which, according to my An Idea, is the energy within a looped string. And of course, the proton and neutron ( the "real" 3D particles) are made up of 3 quarks.

So for the most part our, according to my theory, reality is mostly moving space, dancing to the music from a 3 string instrument.

And from those 3 one dimensional Planck Length strings comes our entire visible universe.

Here is where my beautiful daughter would ask me: " Where do the 3 strings come from Dad?"

yes and that would be a good question

[dleviwing]

If you want to call space the fundamental substance, I have no objections.
You should do more research before inventing another square wheel though!

BTW: String theory is also a square wheel.

[Profpat]

If you want to call space the fundamental substance, I have no objections.
You should do more research before inventing another square wheel though!

BTW: String theory is also a square wheel.

Sometimes you need to think outside of the box;



Maybe we should rethink space.

[dleviwing]

Hi Prof;
We don’t need another Stanly Wagon in science. I doubt if old Stan was doing serious science at the time.

I’m mainly concerned that those who wish to enter their concepts in a serious fashion for consideration that they take time to research existing concepts; even those that fall far outside the box. Of course they can’t go too far wrong by understanding current accepted views either. ldibart is a newbi so I will give him a little more tolerance than usual; You know better though Profpat!

BTW: I did like the picture though.