"a growing block and creation is the 4th dimension"

[AntonioLao]

This concept of micro to macro is becoming widely considered.

Could there be a macro to micro? I need it to initiate cold fusion.

[everymansmedium]

Could there be a macro to micro? I need it to initiate cold fusion.

Hello A.L.:
I do not think so. That is like looking back beyond now/before/future what occures as what we see as creation, beyond the point of the uncertainty principal, As this would be a reversal of time. making fision appear as fusion.
Many thoughts just entered my head.
Your thought brought to mind a flood of information that may take me a while to digest Is it possable that your thinking was somehow related to the function of light becoming matter as in the action that takes place at absolute zero in the Bose-Einstein Condensation. Rather than erasing this I will leave it as maybe it will ring bells with somebody. There is something in this thought or thinking.

I am going to begin a thread to talk about the physics of a universe between the micro and macro. I will talk about the membrane.

Do not try to understand the above it is not coherent. It is only there to see if it can start the kind of flood of thoughts that I just had.
Here is hoping that it rings some bells in somebodys imagination.
John

[AntonioLao]

Relatively, micro and macro is simply respective point of view in the beginning both space and time are in the neighborhood of zero. Today, both are extremely large. However, mass and energy remain constant before, now, and after while the entropy increases and the universe started hot but getting cooler and cooler to an eventual heat death.

[everymansmedium]

Relatively, micro and macro is simply respective point of view in the beginning both space and time are in the neighborhood of zero. Today, both are extremely large. However, mass and energy remain constant before, now, and after while the entropy increases and the universe started hot but getting cooler and cooler to an eventual heat death.

Hi A.L.:
You question above caught me off guard. After careful consideration I Must say that I do not feel that there is any motion/action/flow that goes against the one and only direction of all action. I have a few friends that I worked with that are very much interested in cold fusion.
I never put much effort into these thoughts because I feel that even the accessible energy that is all around us has not been properly accessed. It is not necessary that we access these things right now. A PV panel is made of silicon and a copper substrate. Now I understand that even aluminum is a replacement for the more expensive copper. These items should be VERY CHEAP. They however are not because they are manufactured by companies that are owned by oil companies. The amount of energy that is required to build these is GREAT. If they use energy that is derived from oil, then the price of these things is going to be relative to the cost of the oil that was used to build them.
NOW YOU TELL ME WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE INITIAL INVESTMENT WAS JUST A BIT HIGHER SO THAT THE FIRST MODULES THAT YOU BUILD GO ON YOUR OWN ROOF TO POWER THE PLANT THAT MAKES THE PV PANELS. Now the cost of the PV panels would no longer follow the cost of oil. This would be the greatest sin against the capital oil companies. I hope they do not wait for the Chinese people to do it first. Then the Chinese will own the world. I am not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing I have nothing against these people. But I do not like the oil companies giving away our future to line there pockets now. In time somebody will fix them. I am sorry for the off subject post. But when somebody talks about such things it reminds me of this that feels like a hot ember in my eye.
See prime the pump:

http://notforcapital.com/Prime-the-pump.htm

I am amazed how long people can ignore this fact and still cry about not having enough energy. That thought will in time POWER THE WORLD, and any of the colonies that we form in space also. Even if we travel to another star, they will still work.
Do you think Obama will be wise enough to see this? I send email all over the world showing that post. I even sent it to the people that send all the other email. I guess too many people own oil stock.
John

[everymansmedium]

Could there be a macro to micro? I need it to initiate cold fusion.

Hello A.L.:
It seems I quoted the wrong post in the above. It should have been this post.
The other post I should have indicated that I opened a seperate thread to deal with questions that may be relative to the membrane.

[everymansmedium]

Hello:
There is another way to see this very same thing that is described here in this TOE.

We talked about time as the creator of space.

We talked about consciousness as consciousness of time.

We thought that time is consciousness.

We thought about consciousness as the observer.

We talked about that minimum point of space (Planck length (about 10^-33 cm).) and we talked about the minimum instance of time ( Planck minimum moment of time(10^-43 sec)) as being the point that creation and recreation take place. So as to account for all motion being the result of recreation at this point.

What I did not say was this motion when observed is effected by the observer in the same way that observations by the observer cause the collapse of superposition.

What I did not say was that CREATION IS THE 4th DIMENSION.

This wave of creation comes outward from this minimum point in space during the minimum instance of time to travel outward as a wave of creation that contains the accountability of and the relativity of ALL OBSERVERS. At every Planck moment another universe is created that contains a moment to moment update of the creation so as to account for all things observed. The previous creations have had more time to expand and extend outward beyond the present creation so that to look into the distance you will see the overlapped edge of successive creations. This is ( Creation = being times C^2) Let there be light.
A.I. would be so glad to see how close he was to the understanding of the divine.

bipole[Eden{(space,matter,energy)^3,(time,being,creation) ^1}, Elsewhen{(time,being,creation)^3,(space,matter,ene rgy)^1}].

This is a steady state of “CONTINOIUS DYNAMIC CREATION”

At this point I would consider A change of name for my TOE to.

“CONTINOIUS DYNAMIC CREATION” or “LET THERE BE LIGHT”

If this is ignored the problems with our science will never be fixed. IT is too speculative! But what else could it be when you discover that the underlying building blocks of our universe are non deterministic unless we know the mind of the divine./the mind of all the observers.

Keep playing in the dirt like children. It is just the dust of the void.

It is time to grow up, we have much work that needs to be done to save our planet. Accept what is seen, then act like you know that there will be an accounting for our time. WE are all one, we should begin to act like the brothers that we are.

John EMM

[everymansmedium]

Hello:
This post is a copy of one that I put into a thread on the possibility of seeing a universal geometry that follows a line from the micro to the macro, then again to the macro in a parallel mirror image of our existence medium to then continue back to the micro in that mirror, to then repeat the cycle.
I put it here because I find that there is some understanding to be found here about the concept contained in this TOE.


I hope that I might be able to get back on the subject that I started to communicate about.

I am aware of the difficulties of seeing locations at the macro to be aligned back once again to the micro as would be necessary for this to be seen as a continuos inverting loop.

The point that needs to be examined is alignment of all conceivable locations at the space macro to all conceivable instances also at the macro extreme of 3 dimensional time.

It would be necessary to see this as a flow from a macro extreme toward a micro extreme in 3 dimensional time.

This is the equivalent of a summing of the total universal space back to a micro point of space by way of a macro instance in time to a micro instance in time to again create the next universe in the next Planck moment at every conceivable Planck point in space.

We have no idea how long the divine takes to do this summing for we do not experience any time that is between the Planck moments. For this is the place that the divine exists between the Planck’s. If you will forgive the pun.
John EMM.

[everymansmedium]

Hello:
Is it obvious that at this point that I indicate, the continuos dynamic creation is a complete TOE, That contains an explanation for all things observed. It contains a thought that
allows gravity to be seen as simply a reaction to the act of creation. It has no effect on the other forces they are WYSIWYG. This explanation does not change any of the math in either calculations of our natural visible environment or the unseen quantum activity. It is only the explanation that is changed. It can not be called a science because it can not be proved or disproved. It is much like the existence of the divine itself. However you must consider the coincidental alignment of thought with much of what has been found in all of our religions and you must also face the fact that there is no other thought that can account for what we observe but to consider the observation as the creator.

The other thing that MUST BE CONSIDERED is that if this or something like this is true, our sciences will never find their error and will forever plunder and split our world. They will become as the religions originally were. with there separated followers that are willing to die to protect their ideas and their funding. The one thing that made science better than religion is that there WAS ONLY ONE.


John EMM

[leskey]

Hi, John.

I'm going off track a bit here.

I've just been reading Paul R Heyl's essay in Graybeard's Blog. When I read the following, your concept of a universe of 3D time and 1D space, fell into place for me.

"There is a difference also in our measures of space and time. Space may be measured in feet, square feet, or cubic feet, as the case may be, but time is essentially one dimensional. Square hours or cubic seconds are meaningless terms. Moreover, no connection has ever been recognised between space and time measures. How many feet make up one hour? A meaningless question, you say, yet something that sounds very much like it has (since Minkowski) received the serious attention of many otherwise reputable scientific men. And now comes Einstein, rudely disturbing these old fashioned concepts and asking us to recast our ideas of space and time in a way that seems to us fantastic and bizarre."

Correct me if I'm wrong:

Just as the sentient experience is an holistic one, so too is memory (which is only time). Memory (and to some extent, dreams) captures 3D space and 1D time and stores it as 3D time and 1D space. We remember the feeling on our skin, the scent in our nostrils, the emotions of an experience AND where we were, with whom, what we were doing and what we were thinking. Each aspect of the experience has its own aspect of time. This is the unique data that is every individual. This data, continuing into 1D space, is our soul.

Sometimes, others are well ahead in their thinking on a particular topic, or their version of it. This is a case in point. I often find it worth the journey to try to grasp another viewpoint...

[Graybeard]

I don't remember reading that interpretation in my blog ...... lol

cool bananas ... greg