Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Green Belt
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    65
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: to infinity and back

    The +1s and -1s were described as the square of energy. Does this mean that there is imaginary energy?
    More than one solution is not really a problem; nth degree polynomials have n solutions and 0/0 has an infinite number of solutions.
    In quantisable, spatially and temporally finite universe there would be no need for the infinites to be normalised.

  2. #12
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: to infinity and back

    I got around this problem by creating 2 rational functions A and B such that the product of A and B is equal to their difference: AB = A - B.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is there an absolute Principle?
    By mkirkpatrick in forum Logic and Reasoning
    Replies: 179
    Last Post: 07-04-2011, 04:22 PM
  2. The TOE Paradox
    By Guille in forum The High Level View
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 01-27-2006, 12:25 AM
  3. Fractal Dialectics
    By Mike 5 in forum Theorems and Conjectures
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-05-2006, 12:48 PM
  4. monkeys on the back of QM and GR
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-01-2005, 07:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top