For the sake of cold fusion I would like it to be a hydrogen atom apart with the neutron standing by ready to spring into action by deuteron fusion into Helium-4 nucleus.
For the sake of cold fusion I would like it to be a hydrogen atom apart with the neutron standing by ready to spring into action by deuteron fusion into Helium-4 nucleus.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
there are much to many extremes in those quantum variations between hot and cold. ... maybe on the one side of such high heat we should look on the other of the coin, not a different coin so much? IMHO ..(discalaimer based soul on logic of sage.) kind regards graham.
1841, Ralph Waldo Emerson, The Over-Soul in Essays: First Series, It was a grand sentence of Emanuel Swedenborg, which would alone indicate the greatness of that man's perception, — "It is no proof of a man's understanding to be able to confirm whatever he pleases; but to be able to discern that what is true is true, and that what is false is false, this is the mark and character of intelligence."
At the root of absolute physical reality hot and cold are just relative quantity for measuring the temperature. More so, since temperature is derived from a kinetic particle theory not a potential field theory.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
The H is not enriched enough though it is being worked on in varied molecular conjoining .. the energy to create may be the same as the output my best guess and in the natural ... i can not see it yet ... but then if some one had told me my roller skate wheels on a board would turn into such a used devise a kid can jump and spin the same board with ease in motion and not just barely stay on it down a hill like i did ... well ... i am amazed every day my friend .. kind regards g
1841, Ralph Waldo Emerson, The Over-Soul in Essays: First Series, It was a grand sentence of Emanuel Swedenborg, which would alone indicate the greatness of that man's perception, — "It is no proof of a man's understanding to be able to confirm whatever he pleases; but to be able to discern that what is true is true, and that what is false is false, this is the mark and character of intelligence."
1841, Ralph Waldo Emerson, The Over-Soul in Essays: First Series, It was a grand sentence of Emanuel Swedenborg, which would alone indicate the greatness of that man's perception, — "It is no proof of a man's understanding to be able to confirm whatever he pleases; but to be able to discern that what is true is true, and that what is false is false, this is the mark and character of intelligence."
The law of gravity would suggest that everything is downhill (depletion of unrenewable resources) from now on until we have spin fusion.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
i have pondered the cold fusion and came to the conclude that the axle has to be popped in the quark composite of the torus pictorial .. what will do this i have not got to yet. .. more the hammer and chisel tools the contemplation. IMHO .. kind regards graham
1841, Ralph Waldo Emerson, The Over-Soul in Essays: First Series, It was a grand sentence of Emanuel Swedenborg, which would alone indicate the greatness of that man's perception, — "It is no proof of a man's understanding to be able to confirm whatever he pleases; but to be able to discern that what is true is true, and that what is false is false, this is the mark and character of intelligence."
Until we understand that the cross section of the torus is really a Hopf link in 1D and a Moebius band in 2D.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
G_burnett (03-12-2010)
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 1 guests)