spin fusion

[AntonioLao]

Even among topologists, few can visualized or conceptualize mentally the existence of lower or higher physical dimensions. However, the experimental verifications must always be done in 4 dimensions, 3 of space and 1 of time. Nevertheless, the verification of the isotopic spin of the Higgs field can be done in 1 dimension (angular displacements) as recorded in the LHC.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Sorry Antonio, I don't agree... That's been the trouble with all recent physics, especially QM__It's destroyed its validity, by dis-respecting the Planck base necessities...

Physics had soon get its interpretation house in order__or it's just going to be taken as the joke, it's now turning itself into...

Absolutely defining the bs, there's no such real physical dimension other than 3D, and one for time when it moves...

Yes, measurement dimensions exist, but they only measure 3D and 4D volumes, motions, distances and times...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(volume)

In reality the Planck scale has only been measured to something like 10^-18cm, yet the Planck scale goes all the way to 10^-105cm, or as to how you calibrate the units of choice...

Even the smallest yet un-measured volume is still considered a 3D volume, that far exceeds the infinitesimal exaggerations of 1D bs...

[AntonioLao]

Lloyd, if both Bohr and Einstein were alive today then you would have help settle their argument about QM, on second thought, maybe not. The reason being, Bohr was a true experimentalist while Einstein was a true theorist. My question is are you a true experimentalist or a true theorist? At the moment, I am considering myself more of a true theorist. QM is a true experimental physics. Therefore, only experimentalists can fully comprehend its theoretical implication. Unfortunately, experiments have yet to reach the Planck scales of verification. As a theorist, what I'm hoping is to get cold fusion without using Planck level of action and reaction.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Lloyd, if both Bohr and Einstein were alive today then you would have help settle their argument about QM, on second thought, maybe not. The reason being, Bohr was a true experimentalist while Einstein was a true theorist. My question is are you a true experimentalist or a true theorist?

Both Antonio, as I don't accept any theories that have not passed the experimental tests of reality__and, reality is actual physical exists...

At the moment, I am considering myself more of a true theorist. QM is a true experimental physics. Therefore, only experimentalists can fully comprehend its theoretical implication. Unfortunately, experiments have yet to reach the Planck scales of verification. As a theorist, what I'm hoping is to get cold fusion without using Planck level of action and reaction.

Antonio, why would you even entertain an idea outside the Planck domain of measurement__It's large and small enough to cover all possibilities of thought and experiment...??? Only within the Planck domain of measurement is science__Theoretically or experimentally... If you're operating outside the units and metrics of Planck's many scales, you're operating outside of reality__It don't exist, except as extremely exaggerated intuitive imagination... It's like saying your operating outside the elemental table, where an element with 500 protons and electrons exist__it don't exist...

In order to do any type of science__theoretical or experimental__we must operate within the Planck scale units and metrics related to em... That's been the trouble with string theory, for the last thirty years__they're trying to operate outside/below the Planck units and metrics__Not too successful...

Antonio, there's nothing wrong with using a Klein Bottle Topology as a model, but it's theory dynamics must exist within the many Planck unit scales...

[AntonioLao]

Planck scale still cannot be achieved by experiments as much as most physicists want to. What experiments are you referring to that have reached Planck scale?

[spacedout]

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle shows that a very small object cannot be detected as it travels across a Planck dinstance in a Planck time -- no way to tell where it is at any time except when it expresses itself at the beginning of a Planck time or the start of another Planck time. Sort of like trying to find where an object is between frames in a movie projector.

Objects must be traveling across a Planck time. This is what ccwp theory suggests -- space will be filled with crossed chains of sizes 1^2..2^2..3^2..4^2...... n^2 to make a Planck volume. Thousands of these ccwp's make a Planck volume composing a basic photon that can travel in any direction at the speed of light. The diagonal formula D = (x^2 +y^2+ z^2)^1/2 shows how this is done. To travel in a xyz stepped diagonal a step must be made in the x-direction, then in the y-direction and then in the z-direction in that order. A basic Planck volume D is in the formula for diagonals .. x^2, y^2 and z^2 are ccwp components of a photon. E = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -- this is the energy in a basic photon. The velocity is D which is the square root of E.

From the above let x = 3, y = 4 and z = 0. It can be seen that 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2. The square root gives the distance of travel so there will be 3-steps in the x-direction, 4-steps in the y-direction giving a true diagonal of 5-steps across the coordinates of space. in relation to time 3/9t + 4/16t doesn't = 5/25 units of time -- however, remember that 3/25t + 4/25t = 5/25t is correct because that the travel in 25 units of time (each component was stopped while the other traveled) ----have an appointment to keep.

T

[AntonioLao]

Planck scale physics does not yet exist. So, it is meaningless to talk about experiments using any of the Planck's parameters.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Planck scale still cannot be achieved by experiments as much as most physicists want to. What experiments are you referring to that have reached Planck scale?

Antonio, Planck scales are the physical and time scales that cover all sizes, distances and times, not just any specific metric unit... I've listed them before__ CLICK... They're all listed at the bottom of this page...

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Planck scale physics does not yet exist. So, it is meaningless to talk about experiments using any of the Planck's parameters.

Better check your science Antonio__you are wrong... CLICK... All the Planck scales are listed at bottom of page, from smallest to largest...

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle shows that a very small object cannot be detected as it travels across a Planck dinstance in a Planck time -- no way to tell where it is at any time except when it expresses itself at the beginning of a Planck time or the start of another Planck time. Sort of like trying to find where an object is between frames in a movie projector.

Planck distance, size and time, etc., have no meaning, unless you mentions the exact units and metrics of...

Objects must be traveling across a Planck time. This is what ccwp theory suggests -- space will be filled with crossed chains of sizes 1^2..2^2..3^2..4^2...... n^2 to make a Planck volume. Thousands of these ccwp's make a Planck volume composing a basic photon that can travel in any direction at the speed of light. The diagonal formula D = (x^2 +y^2+ z^2)^1/2 shows how this is done. To travel in a xyz stepped diagonal a step must be made in the x-direction, then in the y-direction and then in the z-direction in that order. A basic Planck volume D is in the formula for diagonals .. x^2, y^2 and z^2 are ccwp components of a photon. E = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -- this is the energy in a basic photon. The velocity is D which is the square root of E.

From the above let x = 3, y = 4 and z = 0. It can be seen that 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2. The square root gives the distance of travel so there will be 3-steps in the x-direction, 4-steps in the y-direction giving a true diagonal of 5-steps across the coordinates of space. in relation to time 3/9t + 4/16t doesn't = 5/25 units of time -- however, remember that 3/25t + 4/25t = 5/25t is correct because that the travel in 25 units of time (each component was stopped while the other traveled) ----have an appointment to keep.

T

You're talking too far outside of physics/Planck measurements, to be interpreted...