spin fusion

[G_burnett]

Hi Ant

I have in the past postulated the rule one of particle interaction where there can be vortex perpendicular change of direction of the particle streams in a degrade of frequency. What you purpose is perhaps the non degrade of the vortex in a containment of material density the streams are going through? Or other form of containment more standard.

I might dare add that the degrade is not a guaranteed observation.

kind regards graham

[AntonioLao]

This degradation makes sense since the magnetic flux density B is equal to the product of the magnetic strength H and the permeability but the permeability is a very small physical value. And mysteriously, a polar vector is transformed into an axial vector simply by the appearance as multiplicative factor or divisor of the permeability. I still cannot understand this?

[G_burnett]

Yes Tony, I have to mention the link our friend Vincent gave to the anti grav testing video ... I have done this conjoin recently to observe a certain containment feature of effect taking place more then i posted a pic of earlier.

The value given on the directional plane changes indeed.
Further testing in regards to shapes past the math attempts I am finding a drool to do and will let u know the results as time an method rule the experiments to a later date right now.

but i look at things in varied ponder then others methinks at times ...

kind regards~graham

[AntonioLao]

Incidentally, the dot product of a force F with itself is always zero while the cross product of F with itself is simply its magnitude |F|. Since the kinetic energy is defined as the dot product of F and the linear displacement R, it is a maximum iff the cosine argument is zero and minimum iff the cosine argument is 90 degrees.

[G_burnett]

sorry it took a while to reply

in creation of the spin effect I still do not have an observation of non d particle stream interaction "dance" decline?

hmmm egrade of origin F without clear containment of the spin from external MF.
Saying this the shape of the containment must be a clear determine of state.
Q. can the shape and composite alignment (s) create the spin to a non decay from the established force?

In the Aurora's there is no containment ... no there is but not in the consideration of plasma astrophysics ... so if the effect is contained would the vortex decay in the event of dance?

kind regards graham

[AntonioLao]

without clear containment of the spin from external MF

Ideally, a plasma is a configuration of equal number of electric charges regardless of their mass disparity. The atom is a good example of this electric charge dynamic equilibrium. On the other hand, the instability of hot plasma prevents long term confinement. however, the stability of stellar hot plasmas is attributed to the existence of magnetic helicities of equal number of clockwise and counterclockwise helix. However, at room temperatures of cold fusion, these magnetic helicities are replaced by the equal number of opposite spins of the electrically charged particles such that for every spin up negative charge there is a spin down negative charge and for every spin up positive charge there is a spin down positive charge.

[G_burnett]

Ideally, a plasma is a configuration of equal number of electric charges regardless of their mass disparity. The atom is a good example of this electric charge dynamic equilibrium. On the other hand, the instability of hot plasma prevents long term confinement. however, the stability of stellar hot plasmas is attributed to the existence of magnetic helicities of equal number of clockwise and counterclockwise helix. However, at room temperatures of cold fusion, these magnetic helicities are replaced by the equal number of opposite spins of the electrically charged particles such that for every spin up negative charge there is a spin down negative charge and for every spin up positive charge there is a spin down positive charge.

Hmmm ok... we can capture and then change the spin motion of a singular electron now. If in my prior posts this static state changed is set in motion of a linear nature other then the spin ... hmmm very interesting.

Is this equal varied orbital state of spin in the atom structure still an electron or a positron? .. based on motive force of the linear to the static state created ... i think right now we would still have an electron view until looked at...

interesting, i will ponder much more on this and get back to you later.

kind regards graham

[AntonioLao]

we can capture and then change the spin motion of a singular electron

I only meant it theoretically analogous to the application of Pauli's exclusion principle for the energy levels of the atoms. If we can do that then we can arbitrarily create any kind and any size of atoms. But my guess is that the Cooper pairs of superconductivity is an example of two electrons of opposite spins joined together to form an electronic boson.

[G_burnett]

ok, i getchya...

my [- + -] electron static torus structure could be the bosom in some pictorial failing to note the view when the snapshot is taken of the sliced torus and the - charge new fundamental charge in different local of the tube vertical plane or x axis, one below and one above in y+ and y- local of that axis.

The new Gamma picture released and posted on this site by me in Vincents thread has the vortex event notable.

Some would say it is {[- +] or [+ -]} depending on where in the tube the charges are related but I see two - states at the same time where later we get the muon and photon on collided dance event.

Thus we have a 1/2 value to the [-] charge in the electron. ... not to say it could not be increased or in paradox condensed by the increase.

yea i know i am way out there. IMHO

kind regards graham

[labelwench]

Ideally, a plasma is a configuration of equal number of electric charges regardless of their mass disparity. The atom is a good example of this electric charge dynamic equilibrium. On the other hand, the instability of hot plasma prevents long term confinement. however, the stability of stellar hot plasmas is attributed to the existence of magnetic helicities of equal number of clockwise and counterclockwise helix. However, at room temperatures of cold fusion, these magnetic helicities are replaced by the equal number of opposite spins of the electrically charged particles such that for every spin up negative charge there is a spin down negative charge and for every spin up positive charge there is a spin down positive charge.

Sounds a lot like the high school dances I recall, lol...

With apologies to Antonio for making metaphor of his sophisticated mathematics.

You gentlemen are definitely in the library. I'll go back to dancing in the kitchen now, just popped in to check up on you two and to add one more positively charged electron, thereby causing minor chaos....

Regards,

Labelwench