spin fusion

[G_burnett]

We have to bracket the conception reality as one of two variant monopole structure. the toronic structure rational in a snapshot view must be considered to it effect in a motion of cyclic nature, in the constant of 'c' and a radiant pole observed as a shell (1911 Thompson reporting on the shell of Geiger and Marsden scattering experiments considered)

In the denial acceptance of non singularity of polar state an exist I added the inverted y functions seemingly to the logic flow of ponder and Dave said ... well ... it’s not proven and they would have to change the books.... I knew that but the intuitive logic stands on it own merit.... but in the last I made re post of the Yin Yang shape observable in the structure it gave great clarity to me that indeed there is the inverted y function of the structure of the free radical. ... then in consideration of the free radical in a structure of more atomic losing it freedom in the conservation of energy rule(s) and note in the lack of saying losing by attachment as i am not sure if that is the case all the time in consideration of the quark rise ... hmmm well .. It’s a deep subject going down the rabbit hole.

On the other structure non cyclic in the picture of a transient wave with direction the monopole is more observant with potential forward and back view taken to the observation made.

I would postulate that the spookiness and strangeness end with the loss of created effect able motion in the transfer event and collapse of the structure .. not speaking in riddles.
It would the event be evidently to the logic.

The magnetic force outward radiant perpendicular to both current and magnetic field gives to the observation of gravity within the brackets of it own transition zone are dimensioned independent of zone ... loss of observation reality potential when the bracketed zone of reality being observed is postulated in a union with another bracketed set of values ... sic.

The outer zone where magnetic field line would align the plasma/space position of density value considered, then subject to the magnetic force would also be with??? Frame drag and??? Mass increase causal and effect considerations ... and the observable push in effect of our absent Vincent describe and bow wave??? And??? Deep space experiment direction need ESA might continue on to the given prediction and more the reel then and impact event of smashing.

What this does indeed all conclude with is the define of those brackets before the consideration of reality or no clarity develops. The analogy of let the student choose his path a right to do has to begin by the determination of the bracket zone of study made clear by the sage for the more example an duty ethic ... hmm ok getting off subject lol.

the term bracketed postulation par am might be a good term for the week... or month

That as you said in it lack is the problem and the solution to clarity IMOH my friend .. kind regards, graham

[AntonioLao]

Personally, my own contention as to why the magnetic monopole cannot be isolated is because its topology is truly one-sided (Mobius topology). Therefore, the two-sidedness of all entities of physical reality requires both one-sided topology of the two magnetic polarity. I have a simple experiment that can demonstrate this physical reality of one-sidedness.

[G_burnett]

Personally, my own contention as to why the magnetic monopole cannot be isolated is because its topology is truly one-sided (Mobius topology). Therefore, the two-sidedness of all entities of physical reality requires both one-sided topology of the two magnetic polarity. I have a simple experiment that can demonstrate this physical reality of one-sidedness.

I would ask to the experiment but i am under the mind set that there would be still no evidentry that it did not pose a "what is the view point taken" question ... and for the second what created the structure ... and third did it evolve from a dual polarity structure to the view had? ... note i do not say it would not be possible to view such a structure but the same consideration can be made in the follow up to the term vibration considered which goes to pulse which goes to two part cycle orbital energy ... radiant ... in a pulse variant potential to effect other based on mass polarity state and motion which has to be time inclusive to the frequency consideration ... better to go down the road to shared electron structure and loss or gain in those structures to fision observation ... having to feed the core is the problem in both fision and fusion to a continual event ... or in space getting free energy then transfer to the earth ... that may be better to think of IMHO as a viable function mechanical advance to use what we know for good .. .. hmmm oh well .. deep subject again .. kind regards graham

[AntonioLao]

Extracting energy from the quantum vacuum can be done anywhere and anywhen. The problem is how.

[G_burnett]

Extracting energy from the quantum vacuum can be done anywhere and anywhen. The problem is how.

get the quarks ire raised ... up the flagpole! let the sun burn baby burn! ... now that is power! ....from the remant of screeech can come' indeed a new keg of taste! ... just add a little fulidity and core of ice? (NewFoundland physics class record ...) sage

[AntonioLao]

Life is much more enjoyable if only reality is controlled by chemical reactions. On the contrary, physical reality is much more controlled by the affinity of nuclear and subnuclear reactions of both quarks and leptons. Therefore, to enjoy the availability of limitless source of energy is simply to crack the bonds of quarks and leptons into separate entities of spacetime charges and recombining them into purer forms of energy.

[G_burnett]

what are the three states of quark but positive, negative and neutral? ... raise the ire on the axial but then absolute no-where in the wink in to a wink out not finding the quark to ire ... this evidentry poses ponder ... maybe more directional wave is need to collect ... a greater cycle structure regards size of the containment being done? ..again a feeder reactor model but feed it quirk\/ idk ... kind regards graham

[AntonioLao]

Actually there are 4 fractional charge states for quarks: ±1/3 and ±2/3

[G_burnett]

yes i know what you are speaking of ... but ... there are actually six in a spinier determinate of state of the quark in the fractor quadrant discribe of the torus structure ... and getting out of the standard mirror imaging i would disprove in the arguement. When the assumption is wrong yada yada .. the new premice must be made and the precurser of a geometric reality to math i have given ... hmm i tih ... okay somewhere ... i recently found another postulating in fluid dynamics with a first year physics paper he put out ... with a life time of intuitive logic conditioning it still came out first year composition methinks unless he is ESL educated and i will get the link from my other site maybe later. ... he is on the same logic flow as i am ... probably will get an f on his paper lol ... kind regards graham

[AntonioLao]

Quarks has another intrinsic property not shared by other elementary particles. This is the color charge property. There are three states of color charge, say, red, green, and blue (these are not physically related to the colors of optics). The quanta of QCD are the gluons, which also carry color charges. However, these color states cannot be isolated by experiments and ordinary matter always appears colorless.