Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 7 of 72 FirstFirst ... 345678910111757 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 719

Thread: spin fusion

  1. #61
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,721
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,614x in 1,153 Posts
    Rep Power
    67

    Re: spin fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by labelwench View Post
    Sounds a lot like the high school dances I recall, lol...

    With apologies to Antonio for making metaphor of his sophisticated mathematics.

    You gentlemen are definitely in the library. I'll go back to dancing in the kitchen now, just popped in to check up on you two and to add one more positively charged electron, thereby causing minor chaos....

    Regards,

    Labelwench
    good point, there is the positron to think of and i did by postulating it is just the static form of the electron being "pushed" by alternative polar state ...Yes, and i picture you in the kitchen often, barefoot and one of those neat little aprons on???... such a lucky hubby you have ... Cuban cigars please with our brandy when you come back ?? Ty dear

    kind regards Graham

  2. #62
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: spin fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by labelwench
    positively charged electron
    Hans Dehmelt, the physicist, was able to trap a positively charged electron which he called Priscilla for about 3 months before he released her into oblivion. See http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=2110&page=34 and http://www.madehow.com/inventorbios/8/Hans-Dehmelt.html
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #63
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,721
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,614x in 1,153 Posts
    Rep Power
    67

    Re: spin fusion

    did she leave him with a Muon?

  4. #64
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: spin fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by G_burnett
    leave him with a Muon?
    Could it be a pion? Since muon and pion are hardly distinguishable in a bubble chamber even though one is a lepton and the other is a hadron.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #65
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,721
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,614x in 1,153 Posts
    Rep Power
    67

    Re: spin fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Could it be a pion? Since muon and pion are hardly distinguishable in a bubble chamber even though one is a lepton and the other is a hadron.
    that is a good question. to have one or the other has to be dependent on state prior to event. ... Spin or polarity value advance?
    just the first to mind here and will do some reading ... or others perhaps answer better.
    kind regards graham

  6. #66
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: spin fusion

    Leptons like the neutrinos, electrons and muons are prime particles while pions are composite meson particles made of quark-antiquark pairs.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #67
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,721
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,614x in 1,153 Posts
    Rep Power
    67

    Re: spin fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Leptons like the neutrinos, electrons and muon's are prime particles while pion's are composite meson particles made of quark-anti quark pairs.
    I m not happy of course that the electron is viewed a prime particle as it exhibits certain composite of opposing charge values in the energy state of view both when in motion linear and static cyclic state that for other then a few attempts at math over the years is not explained other then through drawing a boundary where it is convenient.

    The muon is a very transient state.

    pion's are very interesting in my view as having a certain composite of integrity or state au'natural ... the opposite of how we might consider energy in motion with out entropy effect ..

    but Alas .. IMHO
    kind regards graham

  8. #68
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: spin fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by G_burnett
    electron is viewed a prime particle
    As long as it does not violate Pauli Exclusion Principle.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #69
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,721
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,614x in 1,153 Posts
    Rep Power
    67

    Re: spin fusion

    S: (n) Pauli exclusion principle, exclusion principle (no two electrons or protons or neutrons in a given system can be in states characterized by the same set of quantum numbers)

    Yes Antonio, what had me ponder as i do on the electron was the reveal of our friend Vincent over some time to the vortex visual that takes place on orbiting energy in a torus prior to a vortex or what i would call relative static no linear state of the electron.

    Take a slice view of the torus and we have two circles on both sides of a line in two dimensions. Inside the circles put a divide using a Y and X axis to give four quadrants. in one circle the energy in the torus containment is coming toward you and the other away from you.

    one set of quantum numbers will be in the (-x,-y) set and and one will be in the (+x,+y) set

    this pictorial measure is up for grabs in the math explain and may indeed be an argument to the exclusion principal based on view taken. But then as Dave told me the books would all have to be rewritten IMHO

    Kind regards graham

  10. #70
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: spin fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by G_burnett
    this pictorial measure is up for grabs in the math
    This math might also give a plausible explanation of Cooper pairs in superconductivity. Cooper pair is a pair of electrons that violated Pauli exclusion principle by transforming themselve into a boson of unit spin by adding their half spins.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 7 of 72 FirstFirst ... 345678910111757 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top