[Guille]

This is another part of my TOE. Although I'm still not sure of adding it, because it seems to be more abstract and less verifyable than the processes.

The basic idea is that there is a fifth type of force. This force is generally accepted as not being a force, but being "momentum". I think I should call it inertia, so that people don't get confused. Well this inertia is made of force particles: force carriers: bosons. This type of bosons I have deliberatelly called "inertions".

I will later post the properties of these particles: charge, mass, spin.....Also the experiments that could be done to verify this and the predictions this allow us to do.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE I think I should call it inertia

Are you giving a new definition? Or, are you giving an extension of the physics definition?

The physics definition of inertia is given at the following link.

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Inertia.html

[Guille]

Yes: my definition is the same as the one given in the link. But I have realised that the best word to define what I mean is momentum. so, the particles I know call "Momentumons" or "momentoms".

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE But I have realised that the best word to define what I mean is momentum.

In physics, momentum is already defined by the following link
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Momentum.html

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao In physics, momentum is already defined by the following link http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Momentum.html

I think this definition is correct. Only that it should be considered a force.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE Only that it should be considered a force.

As noted by Newton, force is defined as the time rate of change of momentum

Newton's second law gives

which, when m is constant, reduces to the familiar

see some more about physics' definition of force at

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Force.html