Vacuum medium + Mechanics → TOE (?) ← TAE + Gravity

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Up to now we have learn what, why and how Vacuum mechanics (Vacuum medium+Mechanics) could be the right way to get to the TOE! Here is a short summary.

First we start with the assumption (with an experiment proved) that Vacuum medium is the primordial substance which is the fabric structure of space-time having the internal property of gravity. While charges particles are tiny black holes of condensed Vacuum medium and manifesting as electromagnetic force. Matters, the composition of group of elementary particles, which were forced to hold together by weak and strong forces, and then forming to be material mass. Lastly, the four basic forces of nature are unified and arisen from gravity force of our space-time!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Dear Nimit,

Please define and elaborate on "gravity force of our space-time!"

I mulled over it and I think I can swing with what you had mentioned below, however, I would like a clear understanding for your defination of the above.

Its amazing how nature can wonderfully conjugate to be interrelated in many ways. TY for your post.

Best to you,
vincent

Dear friends,

Up to now we have learn what, why and how Vacuum mechanics (Vacuum medium+Mechanics) could be the right way to get to the TOE! Here is a short summary.

First we start with the assumption (with an experiment proved) that Vacuum medium is the primordial substance which is the fabric structure of space-time having the internal property of gravity. While charges particles are tiny black holes of condensed Vacuum medium and manifesting as electromagnetic force. Matters, the composition of group of elementary particles, which were forced to hold together by weak and strong forces, and then forming to be material mass. Lastly, the four basic forces of nature are unified and arisen from gravity force of our space-time!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear Nimit,

Please define and elaborate on "gravity force of our space-time!"

I mulled over it and I think I can swing with what you had mentioned below, however, I would like a clear understanding for your defination of the above.

Its amazing how nature can wonderfully conjugate to be interrelated in many ways. TY for your post.

Best to you,
vincent

Dear Vincent Wee-Foo,

Thanks for the comment which reflect that you are one of very few people who really a TOE man!

Conventionally, gravity was defined as attraction force between masses of any kind and any size of matters! Anyway, when we go down to elementary particles i.e. electron and proton (not quark, I don’t believe in it), we have no explanation what are they, why and how they are attract each other.

Armed with Vacuum mechanics which state that the elementary particles are condensed vacuum medium. And while the Vacuum medium is the primordial substance which was arisen from contraction energy within, i.e. each of its infinisimal parts hold together forming to be the fabric structure of vacuum space. Then we can say that the medium has an intrinsic property as contractions force i.e. its internal gravity!

Someone may ask, why Vacuum medium need to born with gravity property? The answer is that because it is a negative (force) energy which has to be used for countering the positive energy of the created mass of the vacuum space-time. And we could see that this correspond to the conservation of energy-mass principle. This is what we say that our universe was created out of nothing!

By the way, when viewing from mechanical property side, we may say that Vacuum medium energy has its mass (via mass-energy relation), but it is very dilute mass indeed (that explain why light wave is so high)!

Now we have to make it clear that normal gravity was limited only to the contractions force between mass and mass. Instead, the new gravity has a wider sense, i.e. it was both within mass itself and also between masses. And the most advantage for this new gravity is that it also acts as the transmitting medium between the attracting masses; it is not just a magic gravitational force as the conventionally gravity do!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Dear Nimit,

TY for your definition and elaboration for "gravity force of our space-time."

I agree with your proposition.

This contractional negative energy is more comprehensive than the standard concept of gravity in explaining the universal mechanism of Universe on how elementary particles to the large-scale celestial structures are held in place.

Although I agree with this new gravity acts as the transmitting medium between the attracting masses, I envisioned from the UVS perspective that the phenomenon of attraction is merely an apparent effect. In an isotropic universal medium (in your case its vacuum medium), masses are repelled in volumetric pressure tensor in a push-in manner to paradoxically render as attraction force.

With your definition, you are qualitatively correct to say that "the four basic forces of nature are unified and arisen from gravity force of our space-time!".

Best to you,

vincent

Dear Vincent Wee-Foo,

Thanks for the comment which reflect that you are one of very few people who really a TOE man!

Conventionally, gravity was defined as attraction force between masses of any kind and any size of matters! Anyway, when we go down to elementary particles i.e. electron and proton (not quark, I don’t believe in it), we have no explanation what are they, why and how they are attract each other.

Armed with Vacuum mechanics which state that the elementary particles are condensed vacuum medium. And while the Vacuum medium is the primordial substance which was arisen from contraction energy within, i.e. each of its infinisimal parts hold together forming to be the fabric structure of vacuum space. Then we can say that the medium has an intrinsic property as contractions force i.e. its internal gravity!

Someone may ask, why Vacuum medium need to born with gravity property? The answer is that because it is a negative (force) energy which has to be used for countering the positive energy of the created mass of the vacuum space-time. And we could see that this correspond to the conservation of energy-mass principle. This is what we say that our universe was created out of nothing!

By the way, when viewing from mechanical property side, we may say that Vacuum medium energy has its mass (via mass-energy relation), but it is very dilute mass indeed (that explain why light wave is so high)!

Now we have to make it clear that normal gravity was limited only to the contractions force between mass and mass. Instead, the new gravity has a wider sense, i.e. it was both within mass itself and also between masses. And the most advantage for this new gravity is that it also acts as the transmitting medium between the attracting masses; it is not just a magic gravitational force as the conventionally gravity do!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Dear Nimit,

TY for your definition and elaboration for "gravity force of our space-time."

I agree with your proposition.

This contractional negative energy is more comprehensive than the standard concept of gravity in explaining the universal mechanism of Universe on how elementary particles to the large-scale celestial structures are held in place.

Although I agree with this new gravity acts as the transmitting medium between the attracting masses, I envisioned from the UVS perspective that the phenomenon of attraction is merely an apparent effect. In an isotropic universal medium (in your case its vacuum medium), masses are repelled in volumetric pressure tensor in a push-in manner but paradoxically render as attracting force.

With your definition, you are qualitatively correct to say that "the four basic forces of nature are unified and arisen from gravity force of our space-time!".

Best to you,

vincent

Dear Vincent Wee-Foo,

Thanks for the comment which reflect that you are one of very few people who really a TOE man!

Conventionally, gravity was defined as attraction force between masses of any kind and any size of matters! Anyway, when we go down to elementary particles i.e. electron and proton (not quark, I don’t believe in it), we have no explanation what are they, why and how they are attract each other.

Armed with Vacuum mechanics which state that the elementary particles are condensed vacuum medium. And while the Vacuum medium is the primordial substance which was arisen from contraction energy within, i.e. each of its infinisimal parts hold together forming to be the fabric structure of vacuum space. Then we can say that the medium has an intrinsic property as contractions force i.e. its internal gravity!

Someone may ask, why Vacuum medium need to born with gravity property? The answer is that because it is a negative (force) energy which has to be used for countering the positive energy of the created mass of the vacuum space-time. And we could see that this correspond to the conservation of energy-mass principle. This is what we say that our universe was created out of nothing!

By the way, when viewing from mechanical property side, we may say that Vacuum medium energy has its mass (via mass-energy relation), but it is very dilute mass indeed (that explain why light wave is so high)!

Now we have to make it clear that normal gravity was limited only to the contractions force between mass and mass. Instead, the new gravity has a wider sense, i.e. it was both within mass itself and also between masses. And the most advantage for this new gravity is that it also acts as the transmitting medium between the attracting masses; it is not just a magic gravitational force as the conventionally gravity do!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Dear Nimit,

TY for your definition and elaboration for "gravity force of our space-time."

I agree with your proposition.

This contractional negative energy is more comprehensive than the standard concept of gravity in explaining the universal mechanism of Universe on how elementary particles to the large-scale celestial structures are held in place.

Although I agree with this new gravity acts as the transmitting medium between the attracting masses, I envisioned from the UVS perspective that the phenomenon of attraction is merely an apparent effect. In an isotropic universal medium (in your case its vacuum medium), masses are repelled in volumetric pressure tensor in a push-in manner but paradoxically renders as attracting force.

With your definition, IMHO, you are qualitatively correct to say that "the four basic forces of nature are unified and arisen from gravity force of our space-time!".

Best to you,

vincent

Dear Vincent Wee-Foo,

Thanks for the comment which reflect that you are one of very few people who really a TOE man!

Conventionally, gravity was defined as attraction force between masses of any kind and any size of matters! Anyway, when we go down to elementary particles i.e. electron and proton (not quark, I don’t believe in it), we have no explanation what are they, why and how they are attract each other.

Armed with Vacuum mechanics which state that the elementary particles are condensed vacuum medium. And while the Vacuum medium is the primordial substance which was arisen from contraction energy within, i.e. each of its infinisimal parts hold together forming to be the fabric structure of vacuum space. Then we can say that the medium has an intrinsic property as contractions force i.e. its internal gravity!

Someone may ask, why Vacuum medium need to born with gravity property? The answer is that because it is a negative (force) energy which has to be used for countering the positive energy of the created mass of the vacuum space-time. And we could see that this correspond to the conservation of energy-mass principle. This is what we say that our universe was created out of nothing!

By the way, when viewing from mechanical property side, we may say that Vacuum medium energy has its mass (via mass-energy relation), but it is very dilute mass indeed (that explain why light wave is so high)!

Now we have to make it clear that normal gravity was limited only to the contractions force between mass and mass. Instead, the new gravity has a wider sense, i.e. it was both within mass itself and also between masses. And the most advantage for this new gravity is that it also acts as the transmitting medium between the attracting masses; it is not just a magic gravitational force as the conventionally gravity do!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

For someone who has followed my posts from the beginning would found that we have finished explaining the left side part of the topic title, i.e.

Vacuum medium + Mechanics → TOE ; Or

Vacuum Mechanics = Vacuum medium + Mechanism → TOE

Now we will explain the right side part of the topic title i.e.

TOE (?) ← TAE + Gravity

And we will see why it should not likely to get the TOE by combining gravity with the standard model of particle physics(which was called as “theory of almost everything”,TAE) such as quantum gravity!

Fist let us summarize what the “standard model” is. Conventionally, the standard model is a relativistic quantum gauge field theory. And nowadays it is a successful “unified theory” which involved the three basic forces i.e. electromagnetic force, weak force and strong force, but does not include gravity!

By the way, the standard model is a mathematical theory of elementary particles which includes the three fundamental interactions, i.e. electromagnetic (QED), weak, and strong (QCD) interactions into a single formula. But its mathematical structure is quite complicated and arbitrary!

Now, what is the main problem that prevents to add gravity (i.e. general relativity) theory to quantum (gauge field) theory? The answer is that because their concept of vacuum space is different! While relativity said thatvacuumspace is empty without anything, but quantum mechanics say in the opposite i.e. vacuum space is full with infinite energy!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

In my recent post, I have explained that we can not get a TOE by add gravity (i.e. general relativity) theory to quantum (gauge field) theory because their concept of vacuum space is different, i.e. while relativity said thatvacuumspace is empty without anything, but quantum mechanics say in the opposite, i.e. vacuum space is full with infinite energy!

Now, someone may ask further as “could vacuum mechanics concept solve the mentioned problem?” Fortunately it does - via the existence of vacuum medium space-time, but how? Here is the answer;

Recall that vacuum medium is the raw material which forming to be fabric structure of our universe! And each of its infinisimal part holding together with its own internal contraction energy forming to be the continuum of space-time; it is neither an empty space nor a space filled with infinite energy, but it is vacuum medium space-time filled with gravitation energy!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Up to now, for someone who has followed all of my post would found that I have finished explaining the meaning of the topic’s title as repeat below;

Vacuum medium + Mechanics → TOE (?) ← TAE + Gravity

Which say that “Vacuum mechanics (the mechanism of vacuum medium) is likely to be a theory of everything (TOE), while TOA (the theory of almost everything) plus gravity (general theory of relativity) such as quantum gravity is unlikely to a TOE”!

From now on, I would like to talk about another interesting view of Vacuum mechanics; that is, it was view as the mechanism for all natural phenomena, i.e. actually, all natural phenomenawas the manifest of vacuum medium machinery! So we may say that, in principle, all natural phenomena could be explained by Vacuum mechanics!

By the way, considering the entire main physics theories today (i.e. Maxwell electromagnetic field theory, Newton gravitation theory, Einstein specific theory of relativity, Einstein general theory of relativity and quantum mechanical theory) which was created for calculation and prediction about all electromagnetic phenomena, but unfortunately they do not tell us about their mechanism which explain how the theories work (their physical models)!

Armed with Vacuum mechanics, we will try to explain how it could solve the weak points of the theories mentioned; we will first start with Maxwell electromagnetic field theory, please keep follow to see how we can improve it in the next post.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Now, let us start with Maxwell electromagnetic theory which is very useful and was used extensively in both theoretical and applied physics such as electrical and communication engineering. Historically, when Maxwell created the theory, he also invented a mechanical modelof elastic solid(ether) called a granular model of space forexplaining how the theory works!

Anyway, may be because the ether concept was so strange and the model was too complicated. And the most important point is that (at that time) no one could prove the existing of the ether! So after Einstein had created special theory of relativity whichno need the ether concept, then people have ignored the proposed model and only the Maxwell equations were used until now.

Armed with Vacuum mechanics (the mechanism of vacuum medium), it is easy to make a simple scientific experiment prove for the existence of the vacuum medium! And also it is possible to invent a suitable mechanical modelof vacuum medium for the theory, and then it is not difficult to understand howMaxwell electromagnetic theory works!

First, let us show how to verify the existence of the vacuum medium as below;



The experiment was done with a two-solenoid experiment as show in the diagram. The concept used in this experiment is an elementary physics; it is about the magnetic field B generated by a direct current flowing in a solenoid according to the formula,


B = μin [Where μ is the permeability constant, i is the feeding current and n in number of turns.]

When both two identical solenoids are feed with the same amount (and same polarity) of direct currents as in (a) then the sum of the generated magnetic field is double. But when the feeding currents are opposite as in (b) then the sum of the generated magnetic field is zero! Someone may say that it is what it should be, yes it is, but where is the generated energy gone? It is not possible to be something like that, because we still feed the same amount of energy into both solenoids. Is this means that we can violate the law of conservation of energy? Of course not, we can not do something like that! The only one sensible explanation is that there is a cancellation of the opposite phase of internal rotational stress in the vacuum medium. So this means that vacuum medium is existed, isn’t it?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com