Vacuum medium + Mechanics → TOE (?) ← TAE + Gravity

[vacuum-mechanics]

To have a complete understanding of nature it is necessary to understand why we have 3-dimensions and an identity relocation in space.

Dear spacedout,

Why?

Can 3-dimension be converted into more or less dimensions?

What for?

Can something cause dimensions?

For what propose?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Up to now, we have shown that the phenomena which occurred in Maxwell electromagnetic field theory (post #32-35), and also the gravity phenomenon (post #36) in Einstein general theory of relativity (also in Newton theory) is the mechanism of Vacuum mechanics!

Next we will show thatthe phenomena which occurred in quantum mechanical theory are also the mechanism ofVacuum mechanics. For an example, particle (such as electron) wave in which physicists have used the concept of particle wave successfully, but they still do not know what it is! Is an electron composes of particle and wave? Or is it just a particle but also has wave property?

Armed with vacuum medium space, it is easy to understand how electron could generate wave. This is because the moving electron would disturb the surrounding vacuum medium in the same way as a moving water beetle disturbs the water as show in the diagram.



Anyway, electron wave is not as simple as water beetle wave, which is capillary wave (wave due to surface tension) of water surface waves; instead electron wave is a rotating standing wave. In detail, both beetle wave and electron wave are standing wave which is co-moving with the matter (beetle and electron). But there are two different points between them; first, the former is a 2-dimension wave, while the latter is a 3-dimension wave. Second, beetle wave is a vertical transverse of water surface wave, while electron wave is a rotational transverse wave in vacuum medium.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

In the last post we have learn that what we called particle wave, actually it is co-moving wave (with the matter), such as electron wave which was created by a moving electron disturbing vacuum medium; i.e. particle wave phenomenon is the mechanism of vacuum medium! (Detail mathematical derivation could be found in “Completed quantum mechanical theory, CQMT” in my website.)

Now we will use this new concept of electron (particle) wave for solving one of the unsolved problems in the conventional quantum mechanics; i.e. the well known wave collapse interpretation problem as shown in the diagram below.




According to the conventional interpretation in (a), there is no explanation “how each electron convert itself into waves, passing through both slits and then the two part of waves collapse back into a single particle on screen”. It is something like the “magic of electrons”!

Instead, when using the concept that particle wave is the co-moving wave of vacuum medium, it is easy to visualize and understand how electrons do the magicas show in (b), i.e. all the electron particles moving together with their own created particle waves.

Some of electrons pass through slit 1, while others pass through slit 2 randomly. While each electron passes through slit 1OR 2,its co-moving waves will pass through both slit 1AND 2 at the same time. After passing through both slits, both the waves will interfere each other while moving toward screen. Because the constructive interference zone carries most of the energy of waves (the high probability density), then it will guide the co-moving electron to follow within the zone!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Up to know, we have shown how Vacuum mechanics (the mechanism of vacuum medium) could solve the problem within the conventional quantum mechanics. Next we will use the new concept to explain a natural phenomenon in microscopic ream, i.e. theproblem with hydrogen atom model as shown in the diagram below.



All of us may familiar withBohr model of hydrogen atom as shown in diagram (a) in which the circular motion of electron for the stationary state is at Bohr radius (calculate by using classical mechanics) and it was criticized that it would radiate energy and spirals into the nucleus!

In conventionalquantum mechanics, where what we got is a better model of hydrogen atom as shown in diagram (b). It has shown the probability location of the electron around the proton nucleus for the ground state in atom which was calculated usingSchrödinger equation. And in diagram (c) shown the radial probability density which is maximum where the radius r equal to Bohr radius.

Anyway,even in the model of quantum mechanics, there is still NOexplanation why electron can stay separate from the proton nucleus,and it still depends on Bohr assumption (the postulate of stationary state)! Instead, the problem could be explained by using the concept of “vacuum medium space” (instead of conventional empty vacuum space) and “electron and proton are something like tiny black holes of vacuum medium” (Please see detail in VMTE).

Armed with the concept of“quantum vacuum mechanics”(vacuum medium based QMT)we could use the model shown in diagram (d) for explanation why “electron can stay separate from the proton nucleus and having the probability density” as in (a) and (b). Normally electron can move freely (even at absolute zero degree temperature) in “Bohr shell”for the reason that, it is the place wherethe “Coulomb attraction force”(between electron and proton) equal to the repelling force of the “vacuum medium” in between! (Detail could be seen in CEMT)

Finally we also knew that there is always a small vibration in any atom, except at absolute zero degree temperature! So any electron in any atom could not stay only within Bohr shell, instead it has the probability to move to other location out of Bohr shell when time goes on.So what we got now is a better explanation for hydrogen atom model which is more realistic and understandable!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[spacedout]

I believe there are two basic particles that make all the other particles in space -- a vacuum particle and a pressure particle in an aether medium. Aether space must be a string or x,y,z steps in space that make the three dimensions. The quarks and leptons suggest that particle wave propagating through the string medium either compact space strings or generate a vacuum, both will have mass because mass is a retardation to propagation of waves -- waves are everything. An electron has six sides with -1/6 vacuum charge and a positron has a compacted core a +1/6 pressure charge with a pressure core both have the same retardation ot wave movement (same mass). A neutrino would have an almost zero mass due to three sides vacuum and 3 sides pressure. Quarks make up the rest of the particles and bond togenther causing more mass or retardation to wave propagation. All this suggests that space is a string lattuce work in 3-dimensions.

I find you solution for gravity intreging as a vacuum pulling things together is logical. However, I feel the x,y,z stepped string aether allows for inline steps that freeze movement in segments of the aether, the more compact or stretched the aether the more mass (retardation to wave movement) as apposed to loose space chains. I feel this is the reason for gravity. In other words space surrounding the earth could be compacted or stretched in ether case it would seem like a vacuum for relocations of the aether chain path. Balled aether is like the big bang and a single loop is like the big stretch. We live in between these extremes witch reentergize the entrophy of space.

I believe if I am correct about a cubic space lattice and quarks are made of a pressure particle and a vacuum particle field and 2 up-quarks with a single down quark in the center make a proton with a vacuum and pressure bonds between them . The question is why doesn't the three particles disintegrate? Well, there will be chains between them that would vibrate causing a separtation waves between them. Strings are needed to limit movement while opposition to chain segments points occupying the same position at the same time are prohibited.

An electron, I believe is in orbit at near the speed of light, a problem with this is that an electron orbiting at the given radius would generate 1/2 the spin as what is found in an atom. There is a positive field also that must be rotating in the opposite direction to give the entire electromagnetic field. The cube core of the quarksfaces must oscilate as a wave to produce the spin as probability waves strike the faces unevenly (out of phase). The vacuum and pressure charges around the positron along with shaired space chains could be the cause for electrons and the nucleus to remain separated.

I do believe in vacuum and pressure particles as the basis for matter and energy and also a vortex that generates spin (electromagnetic fields) Thanks for your ideas --- Spacedout.

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Up to now, we have shown some examples of our natural phenomena which involve gravity and electromagnetism that were arisen from the mechanism of vacuum medium (Vacuum mechanics). Next we will show how the Vacuum mechanics involved with the origin and the formation mechanism ofall matters which existed in our universe!

We have learnt that electron and proton are something like tiny black hole of condensed vacuum medium in which both of them are the only two kind of elementary particle. And we could now see the formation process mechanism of the matter as explained in the diagram.


When proton and electron come close together, they attract each other and forming to be hydrogen atom as shown in diagram fig.2 (a). But they can not attach together because of the existing of vacuum medium between! Anyway, if they were forced to attach together and tearing off the vacuum medium between, then a neutron particle will be created as shown in (b). And the resultant is the “attach force” between different size particles (which was dominant after the compressing force had overcome the tensile force of vacuum medium), and was named as “weak force”!

Next if two neutrons and two protons were forced to attach together, then a nucleus of helium atom will be created as shown in (c). And the resultant is another “attach force” between two same size particles (which was dominant after the compressing force had overcome the tensile force of vacuum medium), and was named as “strong force”!

Finally, whenthe nucleus of helium atom was created, it will attract the near by electrons and forming to be helium atom. This is the initial state of the process for forming all kind of the matters in our universe byusing two elementary particles i.e. proton and electron!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com

[spacedout]

I see an electron as a cube with a charge negative or positive (vacuum and pressure) on all six sides.

electron

........-1/6 the forward face and rear face are both -1/6 charge
...........|
-1/6___|___-1/6
...........|
...........|
.........-1/6

up-quark

.........+1/6 The forward face and rear face are both +1/6
...........|
+1/6.__|__-1/6
...........|
...........|
..........+1/6

down-quark

.........-1/6 The foront face and back face have a +1/6 charge.
...........|
-1/6___|___-1/6
...........|
...........|
........-1/6

Electron neutrino

........+1/6 Both the front face and the rear have a -1/6 charge.
...........|
+1/6 __|___-1/6
...........|
...........|
........-1/6

Do you have the mechanism you use for getting the charges (+ or -) 1, 2/3, 1/3 and zero for quarks and leptons in your theory?.

[spacedout]

I see quarks and leptons as having faces aligned with the x,y,z cordinates of space and for an up-quark to bond to a down quark it has to have a face of an opposit charge. Using this I found the probability of the faces of up-quarks and down-guark combinstions as 11/18 not the 3-color combinations that represent a 3/4 chance for combining.

[vacuum-mechanics]

I see an electron as a cube with a charge negative or positive (vacuum and pressure) on all six sides.

electron

...........

Dear spacedout,

It seems that you try to introduce your new idea again and again, but the problem is that there is no scientific background. To make people interest in the idea, you have to give them more technical detail or mathematical derivation, otherwise your effort will be useless!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com