Vacuum medium + Mechanics → TOE (?) ← TAE + Gravity

[vacuum-mechanics]

Vacuum medium + Mechanics →TOE (?) ← TAE + Gravity

[Title’s explanation: Working from left (toward center) may be right, while working from right may be wrong!]

After falling of the glorious string theory, the standard model of particle physicswhich was called as theory of almost everything(TAE) is today still be accepted as a successful unified theory. It involves the three basic forces i.e. electromagnetic force, weak force and strong force, but not includes gravity!

Anyway, to add gravity into TAE such as what was done in quantum gravity seems not yet successful. Now the question is there any a new simple and realistic way to approach the TOE? The answer is yes, may be we could do it via Vacuum Mechanics (VRTE) – the mechanism of vacuum medium!Here isa short introduction about it;

Vacuum Mechanics a realistic theory of everything

Introduction This is a simple and understandable theory of everything (TOE). It was the fruitful product of the author’s original article “Vacuum Mechanicsa New Approach to the Theory of Everything”, together with the four expanding papers; “CompletedMaxwell electromagnetic field theory”, “CompletedEinstein special theory of relativity”, “Completed Einstein general theory of relativity” and “CompletedQuantum mechanical theory” respectively.

To modernize the story of this paper, we will relate it to the recent two great scientific books: The first one is “The trouble in physics” written by Lee Smolin, a founding member of the innovative Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. It is one of the popular books of this kind which talking about “The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science and What Comes Next”. And here, we will try to answer the five great problems in physics (that prevent physicists from TOE and which was mentioned in the book) by using Vacuum Mechanics!

The second book is “The Lightness of Being (Mass, Ether, and the Unification of forces)” written by Frank Wilczek, a Nobel Prize winner in physics 2004. This may be the first best book ever written by a top level physicist which accept the existence of (something like) the aether! And here, we will compare it to vacuum medium concept!

AbstractLacking of rational philosophical ideas (physical models)which explain the mechanisms of the four main physics theories (i.e. electromagnetic field, special relativity, general relativity and quantum mechanics), physicists have failed to unify the four basic forces of nature (electromagnetism, gravity, weak and strong force). Based on the new concept of Vacuum Mechanics (i.e. the mechanism of vacuum medium) which acts as the same one common mechanism for all natural phenomena, then a simple and realistic theory of everything is possible to be achieved!

Content

Vacuum mechanics a realistic theory of everything:-

-TOE -- Unified field theory

- A Universe Made of Marble


Solution to the troubles in physics:-

-Problem of unification of the particle and forces

-Problem of dark matter and energy

-Problem of quantum gravity

Convent. vacuum + quantum vacuum = vacuum medium

-Convent. black hole vs. vacuum medium black hole

-Problem of standard model of particle physics

-What is Higgs?

-Solution to Higgs mechanism

-Problem in the foundation of quantum

Quantum vacuum mechanics

Does God play dice?

Is God a magician?

Mass, Ether, and the Unification of forces

Seers from outside

Conclusion

References
……………………

Please see detail in www.vacuum-mechanics.com

(Download PDF file is available)

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

What is Higgs?

All of us has herd about

The two recent biggest issues in science’s news:-

- The operation of CERN’s Large Hadron Collider for finding Higgs boson.

- The Nobel Prize winners in physic 2008 for discovering “Higgs mechanism”.

But it is interesting to note that

Physicists do not know what exactly Higgs is!


WHY?

What is wrong with modern physics?

Is there any simple realistic way to understand it?

Indeed it is, by using the new concept of Vacuum mechanics!

Detail could be seen in Vacuum mechanics a realistic theory of everything in “VRTE” at

www.vacuum-mechanics.com

sincerely,
Nimit

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Nimit,

In an experiment at CERN by Bailey et al., muons of velocity 0.9994c were found to have a lifetime 29.33 times the laboratory lifetime in the CERN Muon Storage Ring. Assuming time dilation in Einstein's special relativity, the mean proper lifetime is the most accurate value reported to date.

Measurements of relativistic time dilatation.

I understand invariant time is propositioned in Vacuum mechanics, my question is how does the concept of Vacuum mechanics perceive this phenomenon, and what solution can Vacuum mechanics provide to explain the lifetime of mouns for its 29.3 times the laboratory lifetime when they are projected at a velocity of 0.9994c to orbit in the CERN Muon Storage Ring?

Thanks.

[vacuum-mechanics]

Measurements of relativistic time dilatation.

I understand invariant time is propositioned in Vacuum mechanics, my question is how does the concept of Vacuum mechanics perceive this phenomenon, and what solution can Vacuum mechanics provide to explain the lifetime of mouns for its 29.3 times the laboratory lifetime when they are projected at a velocity of 0.9994c to orbit in the CERN Muon Storage Ring?

Dear Vincent Wee-Foo,

It seems that you misunderstood the “time dilation” concept in Vacuum mechanics of my paper “Completed Einstein special theory of relativity (CSTR)”! (Anyway, it may due to not enough detail explanation in the paper, so it gives me a hint for a better revision.)

Actually, according to Vacuum mechanics concept, there is “time dilation” too, but with different meaning! According to the conventional concept, time dilation is “real” for the moving frame, while it is due to “slowing of the moving clock” (not of the true nature of time which is invariant) in Vacuum mechanics.

The crucial weak point in the conventional time dilation is that there is no explanation why it is so, and it was told that it is “kinematics”. In contrary to the “slowing of the moving clock” in Vacuum mechanics which due to dynamics effect of vacuum medium that causes the moving clock to slow down! (Please remember that the mechanism of atomic clock is the vibration of the atom used.)

Now, it is easy to explain the increasing life time of high energy muon, i.e. it is because the moving muon’s mass is also increasing at the same rate! (Please see detail in section 10 of CSTR.)

Nimit

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Dear Vincent Wee-Foo,

It seems that you misunderstood the “time dilation” concept in Vacuum mechanics of my paper “Completed Einstein special theory of relativity (CSTR)”! (Anyway, it may due to not enough detail explanation in the paper, so it gives me a hint for a better revision.)

Actually, according to Vacuum mechanics concept, there is “time dilation” too, but with different meaning! According to the conventional concept, time dilation is “real” for the moving frame, while it is due to “slowing of the moving clock” (not of the true nature of time which is invariant) in Vacuum mechanics.

The crucial weak point in the conventional time dilation is that there is no explanation why it is so, and it was told that it is “kinematics”. In contrary to the “slowing of the moving clock” in Vacuum mechanics which due to dynamics effect of vacuum medium that causes the moving clock to slow down! (Please remember that the mechanism of atomic clock is the vibration of the atom used.)

Hi Nimit,

Although I have read your “CGTR” previously, when I ask the muon experiment question in my last post, I have never read your “CSTR” before. So there is never a problem with your explanation.

I am aware of “the mechanism of atomic clock is the vibration of the atom used”, and understand what you meant by “due to dynamics effect of vacuum medium that causes the moving clock to slow down”. I agree with you that “time dilation” is due to “slowing of the moving clock” and the true nature of time is invariant.

Now, it is easy to explain the increasing life time of high energy muon, i.e. it is because the moving muon’s mass is also increasing at the same rate! (Please see detail in section 10 of CSTR.)

Nimit

I have just read section 10 of CSTR and now I know how does the concept of Vacuum mechanics perceive this phenomenon; more mass need more disintegration’s time. Although I agree with you that time is invariant, how do you qualify in CSTR that it is because the moving muon’s mass is also increasing at the same rate as the increasing life time of muon?

Now that I have read your CSTR, in which you mentioned that time dilation effect is “real” in STR albeit you have an alternative explanation with CSTR. What is your opinion on the following definition for time dilation effect in STR?

"In special relativity, the time dilation effect is reciprocal: as observed from the point of view of any two clocks which are in motion with respect to each other, it will be the other party's clock that is time dilated. (This presumes that the relative motion of both parties is uniform; that is, they do not accelerate with respect to one another during the course of the observations.)" - Excerpts from Wikipedia on Time dilation.

Do you think this time dilation effect as described above is “real”? Or do you agree that this is a correct definition for time dilation effect in STR?

Kind regards,

[vacuum-mechanics]

What is Higgs?
......................

Is there any simple realistic way to understand it?

Indeed it is, by using the new concept of Vacuum mechanics!

Dear friends,

Next, let’s talk about-

"Could we understand Higgs’ mechanism?"

Conventionally, Higgs mechanism is the action of spontaneous symmetry breaking of Higgs field,which give mass to all fundamental particles.Technically the mechanism is well understood, but at a physical level its meaning is not yet fully grasped in particle physics!

The abstract idea of the Higgs mechanism seems to occur in some physical phenomena such as ferromagnetism. And it is usually demonstrates by using the shape resemble to something called the Mexican hat potential shown in (a).



[Here, where the relevant diagram should be placed, but could not be done, so please see it in the web!]


Now, if we try to use the standard model to explain a familiar process such as the beta decay of a neutron into a proton plus an electron and a neutrino as shown in (b), we would found that it is very complicate and difficult to visualize. Instead, it is easy to understand by using vacuum medium’s mechanism shown in (c), please see detail in VRTE (Vacuum-mechanics a realistic theory of everything) now presenting inwww.vacuum-mechanics.com

Sincerely,
Nimit

[MJA]

Vacuum medium + Mechanics →TOE (?) ← TAE + Gravity



Anyway, to add gravity into TAE such as what was done in quantum gravity seems not yet successful. Now the question is there any a new simple and realistic way to approach the TOE? The answer is yes, may be we could do it via Vacuum Mechanics (VRTE) – the mechanism of vacuum medium!Here isa short introduction about it;

)

Dear VC,

The only thing dividing gravity from any other energy, and the only thing dividing the universe into unequal parts is the uncertainty of measure, the uncertainty of the measurer, or the uncertainty of you. Once any uncertainty is removed from the equation, = or equal, mathematically or empirically, is all that truly remains. There is nothing more simple or beautiful in the universe than the equitable true Oneness of the universe ourselves. The only absolute constant in the universe is the universe, then truly = is C, is UFT., is TOE., or more simply: the universe IS.

IS
MJA

Moderators Note: In Science Prefix threads post must acknowledge the laws of physics.

[vacuum-mechanics]

I have just read section 10 of CSTR and now I know how does the concept of Vacuum mechanics perceive this phenomenon; more mass need more disintegration’s time. Although I agree with you that time is invariant, how do you qualify in CSTR that it is because the moving muon’s mass is also increasing at the same rate as the increasing life time of muon?

Dear Vincent Wee-Foo,

Both the increasing life time and the increasing of mass of the moving muon have the same form of their relativistic formulas which tell us how the two properties of the muon are increasing! Both the two relativistic formulas are the rest properties (of the muon) multiply by the gamma factor, which will return to normal properties (i.e. mass and life time) when the muon is stay still.

Now that I have read your CSTR, in which you mentioned that time dilation effect is “real” in STR albeit you have an alternative explanation with CSTR. What is your opinion on the following definition for time dilation effect in STR?

Sorry, may be my explanation is mislead. What I had said about the time dilation in conventional concept, I mean that it is really occurred but it is not the true time dilation of the invariant nature time. Instead, it is the result of the slowing of the moving (measuring) clock!

Do you think this time dilation effect as described above is “real”? Or do you agree that this is a correct definition for time dilation effect in STR?

The mentioned time dilation explained in STR is confusing for me; this is one reason I have to improve it!

Nimit

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

[FONT=Arial]
Both the increasing life time and the increasing of mass of the moving muon have the same form of their relativistic formulas which tell us how the two properties of the muon are increasing! Both the two relativistic formulas are the rest properties (of the muon) multiply by the gamma factor, which will return to normal properties (i.e. mass and life time) when the muon is stay still.

I was expecting that you might be able to explain the machinery of muon with Vacuum Mechanics, to give insight on how muon in motion actually conserve energy in its mechanism to slow down the process of its radioactive decay.

We do not know why the meson disintegrates of what its machinery is, but we know its behaviours satisfies the principle of relativity. Excerpt from "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" Vol I, page 15-7.

Although I understand what you meant by "Both the increasing life time and the increasing of mass of the moving muon have the same form", and this is consistence with the principle for conservation of energy, my comment that your reply is a self-referential explanation using the gamma factor that is known to be working; it did not explain on how the machinary of muon has interacted in Vacuum Space for this to happen in Vacuum Mechanics. Or maybe you have explained this somewhere in your paper?

Sorry, may be my explanation is mislead. What I had said about the time dilation in conventional concept, I mean that it is really occurred but it is not the true time dilation of the invariant nature time. Instead, it is the result of the slowing of the moving (measuring) clock!

Your explanation was alright. And I agree with you that the "real" time dilation refers to the slowing of the moving clock.

The mentioned time dilation explained in STR is confusing for me; this is one reason I have to improve it!

Nimit

I wish you success in advance.

There are many versions and reprensentations of "Theory of Relativity" around. For example, the mathematical relativism propositioned a refied time that could be physically transformed in time dilation phenomena, is different from your CSTR. Other relativistic theory propositioned that time dilation effect in STR is apparent, such as the illustration with the "Ladder paradox", this explanation contridicts with other relativistic theories for their explanations that propositioned time dilation effect in STR is an active transformation.


In your CSTR on "4) Reinterpret Principle of relativity", you explained tranverse course of light in motion and parallel course of light in motion is physically different.

I agree with you. I have came to the same conclusion with a classical explanation, let me know what you think on these illustrations that Einstein's light clock is a fiddled clock.

Btw, please continue with your presentation on "Could we understand Higgs’ mechanism?", I might not be responding to it as yet but I am with all ears.

Best to you.

[vacuum-mechanics]

The only thing dividing gravity from any other energy, and the only thing dividing the universe into unequal parts is the uncertainty of measure, the uncertainty of the measurer, or the uncertainty of you. Once any uncertainty is removed from the equation, = or equal, mathematically or empirically, is all that truly remains. There is nothing more simple or beautiful in the universe than the equitable true Oneness of the universe ourselves. The only absolute constant in the universe is the universe, then truly = is C, is UFT., is TOE., or more simply: the universe IS.

Dear MJA,

Would you please give more detail how the Uncertainty principle do the job?

Indeed in quantum field theory, the Uncertainty principle was used as a magic tool for solving the problem of virtual particle in quantum vacuum!Traditionally, it was said that creating pairs of virtual particle and antiparticle are possible (even it violates energy conservation principle) because of the magic mathematical formula of the Uncertainty principle.

Conventionally, Heisenberg’suncertainty principle based the measurements which show us thatwe can not determine both the position and the momentum of subatomic particle such as an electronwith unlimited precision, but only accordant withΔpΔx ~ h.The problem is that we do not know how and why it is so! Instead, based on quantum vacuum mechanics, it is easy to explain that it is due to the wave packet (of vacuum medium) created by the moving electrons, which act as the mechanism of uncertainty principle!

Also it is interesting to note that we do not know the physical meaning of Plank constant which acts as a magic constant the Uncertainty principle! Conventionally, Planck constant h is a proportional constant derived from the mathematical formula of black body radiation (E =hf).

Viewing from our new concept of quantum Vacuum mechanics, we would found that actually the physical meaning of Plank constant his -- one unit of the “quantum action”of the vacuum medium’s wave packet created by the changing state of an electron in an excited atom of the “black body radiation” phenomena!

Finally we could understand that the early mentioned particle – antiparticle pairs actually they are pairs of opposite spin vortices of disturbed vacuum medium not magic pairs of particle – antiparticle as misunderstood. So we may conclude that God is not a magician! (Please see detail in VRTE.)

Sincerely,
Nimit