[Juan R.]

Canonical science is a ultradvanced theory that i am developing from two years ago approx.

It reduced theories of physics, chemistry, ecology, etc to a single theory very advanced.

This is not a string theory!! In fact, string theory is little developed when compared with this research. Most of high-level theories in several disciplines, kinetics, gravitation, dissipative QM, etc. arise like simplifications from canonical theory.

I am preparing both research papers and educative viewpoints in the topic.

In my webpage (www.canonicalscience.com) you can find lot of data, links, etc. on this new revolutionary theory.

I am open to solve question or doubts.

[AntonioLao]

what's the absolute objects in your theory? Mass or charge or current? space or time? Or the metric tensors?

[Juan R.]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

what's the absolute objects in your theory? Mass or charge or current? space or time? Or the metric tensors?

Please be more specific with the sense of "absolute". I don't understand you.

[AntonioLao]

In Newtonian mechanics, the absolutes are space and time giving the planes of absolute simultaneity and the straight lines - the Galilean transformation group.

In special relativity, the absolutes are the light cones.

In general relativity, the absolute is the Riemann-Christoffel tensor.

All these are considered as invariances of the theories.

[Juan R.]

Now, i understand to you.

Invariances of the theory:

- the vector of state.

- Time.

- Stoichometric vector.

- Omega transport coefficient.

- The generators of evolution (are related to entropy).

[skaper]

from where i cuold study and read the theory?

[Juan R.]

In the past, three or four (I don remember now) articles was available at CPS. But by economic and other questions was forced to close. I was searching with google, and i think that previous material is not longer available.

i posted five pdf articles, including research in nanothermodynamics and viewpoint material in future of chemistry, etc. in

www.canonical.chemicalforums.com.

A specific forum for canonical question was also available some time. But forum was forced to close, and by several academic and legal motives, previous canonical page was forced to "close".

Again it was "reopen" this year. I have done an attemtp to post a first article (nontechnical) on ArXiv, but there are neglecting in the basis of recently launched Endorsement methodology.

Some scientists suggested to me not waste my time with ArXiv since even if finally my work is up, administrators would erase it because is attacking string theory, and scientific debate is not welcomed by that arrogant community.

Finally, Articles on canonical science will be directly available in the web page of the center in a new journal with novel publication and review policies.

See my proposal with Shagaev for more data on our critique of usual journals.

[dleviwing]

Juan;
Can you state your concept in less than 100,000 words??
Between your web site and your posts, all I see are quotes, news articles, rhetoric, and pure nonsense. What are you trying to claim???????
Is your theory so sophisticated that one requires an IQ of 260 to understand it??
The TOE dose not require sophistication, it requires simplicity. Try it.
Regards;
dleviwing

[skaper]

(Some scientists suggested to me not waste my time with ArXiv since even if finally my work is up, administrators would erase it because is attacking string theory, and scientific)>by joan
why a theory attacking to string theoty should be erased ?
scientists so sure about the srting theory?

[skaper]

a mistake at last question > are scientists so sure about string theory?