Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    bridges of Konigsberg

    In 1736, Euler wrote a paper on the bridges of Konigsberg. This is now regarded as the earliest paper about the theory of graph. He presented his solution and present-day solution also existed. More about graph theory at the following site.

    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Graph.html

    and

    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Koenigs...geProblem.html

    Obviously, graph theory is based on two dimensions. But what is the 3D analogue of this theory?

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    I guess that at least the 3d analogy of this "graphs" would include faces. So it would have a big adjacent part to it.

  3. #3
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    I also think that graph theory in 3d would ahve different types of craphs.


    But....wait.....These graphs already are 3 dimensional analizes. I say this because the edgs can cross, whiles in 2d that's important. I guess these graphs are 2d representations of 3d phenomena.

    If you disagree, try this:

    draw three circles and three triangles of the size you want and the positions you want on the same paper. You can't make any of the objects touch another object directly. Try to join each circle with each of the triangles. At the end, there is a minimum of one line that you can't do without crossing with another line. Thus, this exercise can't be done in 2d. It requiers 3d so that one line could go under another one.

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    GUILLE,

    What I'm trying to visualize are forbidden 3D regions, which can only be connected by 3D bridges. So, the bridges must exist in 4D! Maybe these are wormholes between different universes?

  5. #5
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    well,

    wormholes haven't been proved and plus theoretically, they don't uccupy space: you can travell them in zero time, though they have legth they have no space. It's dificult to explain.

    That's why I would be far from them. And you would have to say a way of proving the 4 dimension. I don't ahve problems with new dimensions, I just need strong proves.

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    wormholes haven't been proved and plus theoretically, they don't uccupy space:
    wormholes are 4D or higher dimensional bridges. connecting the future light cone to the past light cone centering on an event, which is called the present.

  7. #7
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    what is a light cone?

  8. #8
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Antonio,

    As an answer I must say that 3d objects can be conected via 3d objects. You can get two cars put thm one meter apart. You get a ruler. The ruler touches with each end a car. The cars are 3d obejcts conected via 3d object: ruler.

    You don't need 4d at any time.

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    As an answer I must say that 3d objects can be conected via 3d objects. You can get two cars put thm one meter apart. You get a ruler. The ruler touches with each end a car. The cars are 3d obejcts conected via 3d object: ruler.
    If you happen to be in Texas, you will see many bridges and overpasses, which were built to solve traffic jams and rush hour congestions. These bridges and overpasses are analogous to the vacuum bridges to overcome the mass congestions found everywhere in the universe as galaxies and stars. All things moves along curvatures, which are geodesic bridges in 4 dimensional manifold. But these geodesic bridges do not cross the fifth dimension of spacetime.

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,786
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    what is a light cone?
    the following site contains information about light cone
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top