A concept for a universal ether

[spacedout]

If there is two sets of rules for observing moving light and another for the observer then the EPR correlation experiment may be due to the observer that sees true diagonal distances while light is stepped up and down {sign wave}. Sense c = distance and c^2 is time {number of total steps-- time}. The time to travel the diagonal distance c^2+v^2 not c^2+2cv+v^2; the interferometer sees the latter. The difference is in the use of x/h the cosine function as experiment provided not the cosine square function. The interferometer and the stepped distance gives a cosine function for light. Still working on this, to bad Einstein didn't see special relativity in the EPR experiments.

[spacedout]

In step theory light will crosses the v-arm at the same time light crosses the h-arm of the interferometer---the horizontal length is (c^2+v^2)^1/2---contradicting c+v of the other. The interferometer is what the observer sees but the steps of the sine wave of light is a cosine function---for instance, a 3-4-5 triangle the cosine is 3/5 if v is on the x coordinate and this is the function the interferometer works on. The square of the steps for a 3-4-5 triangle is 9x + 16y = 25 the square of the terms and is the total number of steps {time traveled}. The EPR experiments are done on two interferometers with a correlated light traveling to the two interferometers that measure the cosine function for TRANSVERSE waves of correlation v+c not (c^2+v^2)^1/2.

[spacedout]

Sorry, the above is wrong, the analyzers see a cosine funtion not the stair stepped diagonal up the c arm and back which would be a cosine square function. The cosine function is like a radius h rotated 90-degrees with projections down to the x-axis. Analyzer A is stationary and analyzer B is rotated---full correlation exists when the polarization of analyzer B is aligned to analyzer A. This is like having the doors open for all incoming photons. At 90-degrees turn of analyzer B degrees the correlation is zilch and at 45-degrees 1/(h)^1/2 a cosine function. {The true alignment for correlation is to catch the horizontal polarized photon at the same time catch the vertical polarized photon}. This is part of special relativity which the hypotenuse of photons sign wave is stepped against the observation of the analyzer measuring a straight line---
x+y against (x^2+y^2)^1/2 which is a rotated radius of distance c. I have drawings that would help out a lot but for some reason I forgot how to send it or the computer isn't working right.

[Graybeard]

If there is two sets of rules for observing moving light and another for the observer then the EPR correlation experiment may be due to the observer that sees true diagonal distances while light is stepped up and down {sign wave}. Sense c = distance and c^2 is time {number of total steps-- time}. The time to travel the diagonal distance c^2+v^2 not c^2+2cv+v^2; the interferometer sees the latter. The difference is in the use of x/h the cosine function as experiment provided not the cosine square function. The interferometer and the stepped distance gives a cosine function for light. Still working on this, to bad Einstein didn't see special relativity in the EPR experiments.

In step theory light will crosses the v-arm at the same time light crosses the h-arm of the interferometer---the horizontal length is (c^2+v^2)^1/2---contradicting c+v of the other. The interferometer is what the observer sees but the steps of the sine wave of light is a cosine function---for instance, a 3-4-5 triangle the cosine is 3/5 if v is on the x coordinate and this is the function the interferometer works on. The square of the steps for a 3-4-5 triangle is 9x + 16y = 25 the square of the terms and is the total number of steps {time traveled}. The EPR experiments are done on two interferometers with a correlated light traveling to the two interferometers that measure the cosine function for TRANSVERSE waves of correlation v+c not (c^2+v^2)^1/2.

Sorry, the above is wrong, the analyzers see a cosine funtion not the stair stepped diagonal up the c arm and back which would be a cosine square function. The cosine function is like a radius h rotated 90-degrees with projections down to the x-axis. Analyzer A is stationary and analyzer B is rotated---full correlation exists when the polarization of analyzer B is aligned to analyzer A. This is like having the doors open for all incoming photons. At 90-degrees turn of analyzer B degrees the correlation is zilch and at 45-degrees 1/(h)^1/2 a cosine function. {The true alignment for correlation is to catch the horizontal polarized photon at the same time catch the vertical polarized photon}. This is part of special relativity which the hypotenuse of photons sign wave is stepped against the observation of the analyzer measuring a straight line---
x+y against (x^2+y^2)^1/2 which is a rotated radius of distance c. I have drawings that would help out a lot but for some reason I forgot how to send it or the computer isn't working right.

The correlation is never 'zilch'.

I don't think this has anything to do with relativity ... special or general.

If you email me your drawings I will upload them for you. I am not sure that I am reading you correctly but you seem to be trying to relate Einsteins theories to the EPR paradox ?

cool bananas ... greg

[spacedout]

Hi Greybeard: I will send you my latest manuscript complete with drawings and graphs to explain my work, but I need an adress to send this to you no cost. No one needs to take my work seriously---it's just my lifetime hobby. My book isn't selling and I lost money on it. I just want to share my concepts which I think are interresting. I don't think anyone has an idea like this. Planck lengths seem to suggest that out universe is boxed in extremely small units. To cross space identity all matter and light must relocate in distinct units or steps. If all steps through space are aligned to a space matrix; for instance v-steps are added to c-steps up and down the vertical arm of an interferometer while this also takes the same number of v-steps then c steps forward and back of the horizontal arm of the interferometer. In this way both beams move in a chronological order at the same time. Of course c+v > (c^2+v^2)^1/2---for me this is the only way to have both beams arrive at the same time in the interferometer. I also feel that the interferometer is reading a cosine function for the chance for correlation to happen. Open the cosine door wider and more photons will get through and correlate. I believe Einstein was right but didn't think in terms of Planck steps in a stepped time-line. Of course the time-line is extremely finer than a Planck length.

[spacedout]

　

Note: in the drawing that the area c^2 is divided into x^2 area and the y^2 area x^2 + y^2 = c^2. Projections from x steps to the diagonal are contracted (in step theory diagonals don’t exist) ---this is the reason for correlation between correlated particles..

When a meson disintegrates, two photons are emitted, one moving in the opposite direction of the other -- one photon is perpendicularly polarized as to the other. The inclination of polarization is at any angle relative to space orientation, but in random radial order, when emitted. In ccwp theory correlation is related to ccwp wavelengths between analyzer A and analyzer B. Analyzer A will observe horizontal aligned particles while analyzer B will observe vertical aligned particles from correlated particles as correlated photons are perpendicularly aligned (correlated particles are 90-degrees apart in alignment so both analyzers are reading the same thing. The numbers of particles emitted will be registered and compared for coordination of vertical to horizontal readings. For instance at 45-degrees a center point for correlation is ½ of 45-degrees which is 22.5-degrees. The ½ @ between analyzers gives the condition for equal wave lengths.

Note that the yellow triangle (component) changes size from zero to the full wavelength of light that travels along an x, y or z space orientation -- there isn’t any true diagonals only time-leaps. The wave projections from the x-side of the x^2 rectangle to the projected side of the yellow rectangle on c^2 are contracted while the true areas of the blue square and rectangle are the same, meaning that there are as many time-leaps in both areas. The wavelengths of the yellow square are projected to the yellow triangle, but do not fill the area on the rectangle. The projection from the x-square to the diagonal of the yellow rectangle is equal to the wave length of C related to the speed of light.

Both analyzer A and analyzer B observe an equal sized wavelength of the yellow square on the x-axis -- one analyzer sees a horizontal wave pattern and the other a vertical wave pattern due to the opposite polarity of the correlated photons separations from each other. These chain segments, of a ccwp, form the yellow square shown above. At 45-degrees there will be as many ccwp’s for analyzer B as for A -- however there will be ½^2 more wave chains compacted between line Ab of the yellow rectangle (there isn’t any “real” diagonals). There will be more smaller ccwp’s in a Plank volume of light than would larger ccwp’s (remember that the diagonal is a projection). Projections of unit measurements from real leaps are projected to line ab.

The line ad = x and at 45-degrees the chain lengths of a ccwp is 1/2^½ while the chain length of Ab represents the amount of x-chains ½^ ½ of the yellow square and this ratio is the correlation value. When

[Graybeard]

The drawing, presumaby in the above post, didn't appear for me. So I'm at a loss to follow you.

greg

tex@photo.net

[MJA]

A Universal Ether
Equality or Oneness is the ether that unites us all.
Mathmatically the equation for unity is: =
UFT, TOE, the ether, you and me.

[spacedout]

I had a friend help me e-mail a page of my manuscript to this post but it didn't transmit the drawings. I think it is because I transfered some of the manuscript from one computer to another and they are not compatable. I couldn't get back on the post for some reason to explain what happened. I can give a list of reasons for correlation due to stepped conditions due to Planck leaps from one box in space to another.

1) To get light to travel at c-speed relative to the arms of an interferometer v-steps for the forward direction and c steps are taken up and down the vertical arm and the horizontal arm [due to infusion of c-steps it takes longer to cross the arms of the interferometer.
2) Each step forward is c-time, c-distance and c-energy all in one.
3) The c + v steps constitude the speed of light relative to a spacial fixed position but c to the moving interferometer.
4) The observer using his speed of light c measures the diagonal movement he sees up the diagonal distance of the staircase up and down steps as a straight line
5) What he sees is diagonal D = (c^2+c^2)^1/2---the staircase steps are longer than the diagonal
6) It will take longer to step the upward and downward steps of the staircase and this puts both the beams to reach the ends of the arms at the same time and then return together.
7) Given a 3-4-5 triangle If v = 3x and the travel up the virtical arm and the horizontal arm is c = 4 while the diagonal is 5.
The staircase speed is 7 steps while the true diagonal is 5.
9) Adding velocity v to c {in absolute space} is not like S = (c^2+v^2)1/2 {a mathematical diagonal}---c^2 is total side steps of time while c is forward velocity.

[spacedout]

9) What does the interferometer measure? Is it the true diagonal or the stepped diagonal?
10) Interferometer A is stationary while analyzer B is rotated in the EPR experiment.
11) Rotation means a projection is made to the x-axis and is a cosine function measureing the x-component with the y coordinate giving the magnetude of the sign wave.
12) Alignment gives 100% coordination while each degree of opening gives less and less correlation. In facteach degree of rotation is a cosine function of x/c where c is the diagonal.
13) It's all to do with fewer photons/degree of rotation.
14) At 45-degrees all the photons have been correlated and none are left so there is zero correlation. Of all the possible correlated photons rotation closes the larger y movement up the vertical arm leaving fewer, shorter ones to be measured.
15) At 45-degrees it would be expected that 1/2 of the photons would be correlated, but instead there will be 1/2^1/2 will be correlated. Because there will be more photons of the total that share correlation. There are only a give number of correlations from start to finish and more are correlated at 45-degrees than expected.

I just can't believe that action-at-a-distance is possible. The answer is in the machine and the way light behaves.