A concept for a universal ether

[spacedout]

Thanks Bogie

I'll try to send some more pictures. The three-quark neutron smashed by a neutrino shows how the six face charges can react to produce a proton, electron and kinetic energy of a photon. Actually, the neutrino should hit the down quark and transform this into an up-quark and an electron . Sense the central up-quark in the middle will be repell the transformed up-quark and send it over to the down-quark by unlike charges with the down-quark in the middle particle (proton). The transformation does happen to a free neutron -- it becomes a proton, an electron and radiation. It's not in the texbooks about a neutrino striking the neutron to transmutate -- it was thought that the transformation was an instability in the makeup of the free neuton. Interrestingly, an electron-neutrino can change into a muon-nutrino and gain mass (travels slower) I guess. What I see is two electron-neutrinoes coming together to form another family of neutrinoes. It is a much more informative way of thinking about the families of quarks and leptons. Neutrinoes fill space and can by chance cause a mutation of the particles.

[spacedout]

The fastest movement in space is a step in time and its speed is the number of steps along a universial looped time-line universe in one cycle time of the path. Nothing can go faster than this -- the speed of light in comparison is close to zero. The speed of a step in cycle time is very slow. If all x,y,z steps are moved in one direction say x there will be no time in the system as all movement is in one direction. Time slows as the aether step path is moved more in one direction -- this is relativity at the basic level of existence. This is why, that during expansion of the universe (as in the big bang) light (in the big bang) can travel many times faster than the speed of light.

Blocking steps (steps that land directly behind another step along the path) cause forward movement or inertia. From this it is easy to understand why light sweped by the aether can speed up (compared to the aether) after the speed of the aether is slowed down.

[spacedout]

A helium 4 atom has zero spin while a helium 3 atom has a 1 spin. This is confusing to me because the electrons are spining in the same orbit -- due to their repulsive charge they would always be moving in the opposite direction -- however, they would produce a magnetic north and south pole (like electrons traveling through a loop conductor). To me thats spin -- a north and south pole. Just because there is a missing neutron in the nucleus what has this to do with electron orbital spin.

I do believe in the Bohr model of orbiting electrons but the round/time is related to the pulse of the nucleus. I see rythmatic x,y,z opposite face compaction of the core of up and down quarks that generate a salient 3 phase field. All the electrons would follow this salient field at the same rounds/t and those that are farther out would travel faster generating a stronger magnetic field. The spin of each orbit would be related to the orbit speed of the electron. The energy is related to the change in direction form zero to top speed at 90-degrees. I don't know what this has to do with 1/2 spin though.

Also, if the faces are fixed to the coordinates of space the electron orbits would also be aligned to the coordinates of space.

[spacedout]

Why moving + charges have a right-hand spin while a - charge has a left-hand spin is a mystery. Crossed chain wave theory suggests that spin can't occur if traveling along the x,y or z axis of space -- but diagonal x,y,z travel will cause a phase spin. The problem is that there will be two opposing twists from one corner of space as compared to the other -- Of course there are 4 diagonal screw twists. Allso, space chains would have to be spaced in an order so that while an object travels along the diagonal of space it must step first say in the x-direction then in the y-direction and then in the z-direction to make a phase spin. Change the step from say a +x to a -x and the phase spin will reverse -- this is the reason for alterations of phase spin in different direction.

An object such as an electron will be composed of a vacuum field and when it moves forward space chains fall into the void -- in other words the void moves forward (particle) while space chains move in the opposite direction. This is the reason for an electron having the opposite spin of a positron. Even though the spins change in diagonal directions to space the spins of vacuum and pressure particles are opposite but react as though they have a set spin (also, remember that particles vibrate so that at any given time they change directions and spins). The truth is that we don't observe actual spin directions just a precieved spin.

A particle, such as an electron, in a magnetic field will still produce a left-hand curled path through space while a positron will have a right-hand curled path through space. This would have to be the fact if the theory is true but can it really explain this. Room for thought.

[spacedout]

Our world is fashioned from electron clouds that orbit a nucleus. Electrons in orbit travel in various directions and (if) spin is an x,y,z twist in the stepped path of an object, such as an electron, the it will change spins according to the direction it travels (from a x,y,z spin to a
zero spin along an axis of space and then to the reverse spin -x,y,z. A positron will have an opposite spin due to the movement of space chains as it travels in the opposite direction to the space chains.

A positive field will have below ambient space pressure while a negative field will be below ambient pressure. The question is how this effects the travel of an electron verses a positron. Of course the spiral path of an electron is influenced by a vortex as is als a positron. The vortex on the face of a core isn't a product of x,y,z phase spin but a exploded splash pattern and an inverse splash pattern due to the movement of space chain into or away form the core at the face of the core. This could be the reason for the independance of electric force as verses a magnetic force.

[spacedout]

An electron passing through a negative field will be deflected away from the field -- when passing through a positive field an electron will deflect towards the positive field, this is a fact,
-- what is the physical reason (or model) for this? Photons are force carriers -- one type of photon in a field will impact and force a matter particle away while the other photon force carrier will pull the mass particle towards itself. How else can this action be explained?

A positive field entering a negive field canceled both fields into ambient space aether (random vibrations of space) -- this allows a type of black hole forcing particles with those fields to pull together as they propatate (as a vector wave) in the empty aether that is generated by the two fields.

Two positive fields will be forced away from one another due to the double impacts between them for every single impact from outward faceing sides of the two particles. Two negative fields will be drawn away from each other as chains of negative particles are pulled into the vacuum of the field pushing apart the two negative particles -- negative particles are vacuum waves in which chains fall into them as the void moves in the opposite direction.

Magnetism is the product of a vortex spin (donut shaped) a south pole at one end of the donut hole in which the field collects and moves through the hole spreading out as a north pole. A static field and a magnetic field act independantly of each other but they both have an effect on one another.

A gravitational field is caused by in-line identity step transfers along a universal time-line aether. A gravitational field acts independantly to the other two fields but also the counter control each other.

The strong neuclear field is just a electrostatic field at closer distance between the neuclues as compared between orbiting electrons and the neucleus (inverse square law).

Matter particals are composed of up-quarks and down-quarks that have 6 faces with a mix of positive face charges and negative face charges. Some of these face charges on protons and neutrons repel while others attract making the separations between the three quarks possible as independant protons and neutrons (Pauli's exclusion principle).

The explainations given can't be found in any text book on science take it or leave it. Modern science doesn't like models.

[spacedout]

My whole theory is full of ifs and maybe it is BS that = BS and so on but at the basis of a concept you start somewhere that sounds logical to you. An object traveling through a x,y,z stepped aether will have to follow a x,y,z spin alignment of space chains to preform in a chiral handed spin. It's iffy but if true it could explain the chiral spin of vacuum and pressure particles relative to ambient space pressure.

The faster an object travels through space the greater the spin -- it would seam. However, the maximum x,y,z + vector of travel phase spin according to the formula speed S = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^2 in which crossed chain wave particles form a photon that travels in any direction at the speed of light. Any thing traveling along a x,y,z spin path would not notice any action between particles such as magnetisum but any object moving in other directions would feel a difference in spin.

According to relativity clocks run slower aproaching the speed of light. An observer will see x,y,z spin moving at a slower rate as forward vector steps are taken from the x,y,z steps dimensioning the object and set for a vector direction giving say more forward vector step in each of the x,y,z structural compones freezing them as this occurs (this is the reason the clocks run slower).

Truth is an objects spin is relative to the observer -- no change in spin to the observer, but to an outside observer the real x,y,z spin rotation in time does increase.

[spacedout]

It's interresting that the big bang can travel several times faster than the speed of light. A stepped x,y,z aether shows relativity as switching x,y,z structural components of say light or matter into vector movement as in a big bang. If all structural points of an object are aligned in one of the three vector directions x,y,z this would be the fasted movement possible. The whole universal balled system would stretch into a huge cube. At this maximum speed there wouldn't be any movement in the other two dimensions and if the path doesn't change time doesn't either ( this is a primitive type of stepped special relativity in the aether). Actually the final expansion of the aether would be a square timeline without any matter or waves in it.

The big bang is driven by blocking movement of steps landing behind other steps in a chronical order causing an arrow of forward time -- this drives the whole thing forward towards the end of the big bang and then the steps behind drive the chain into an implosion. Chronological steps are the driving force of the big bang and the great implosion.

It seems that evolution can occur even during an implosion -- no beginning or end. We definitely live in a finite system that goes on forever.

[spacedout]

Some scientists believe that our world is infinite -- I dissagree with this. The big bang is focused from a central point in space and as of now everything is moving outward with the most distant parts moving the fastest even faster than the speed of light. There must be an explanation and an implosion would be the best answer. If this is so we live in a finite world. Empty space is impossible and it doesn't exist -- you can only move as far as the aethe allows. Aether is the only reality and maybe a step comprising the aether is not a step in distance but something we don't understand yet.

[spacedout]

The six apexes of the core of quarks and leptons would have a spin associated with pairs of opposite faces coming together and moving out as a vibration. The x-face pair will come together and then the y-face pairs will come together and then the z-face pairs will come together as the other two face pairs move outward. The spin at the x,y,z axis of the face pairs will cause a central spin along a diagonal to the core -- this in turn will stir a field vortex. Electrons do orbit around this field spin and insures the electron will not fall into the nuclues. Also, up-quarks and down-quarks have a pulsed x,y,z spin that disrupts the faces of the quarks from coming together, they would tend to orbit each other leaving space between them.