Quantum Wave Cosmology is my TOE :)

[Bogie]

You mis-interpret me a bit Bogie. I do not discourage seeking the experiential connections. I just see the connections as the quantum-waves of infinitesimal discreet particle/wave inter-actions, within the greater continuum__Always connected...

Well so do I. But I still suspect something like what Penrose calls non-algorithmic.

[Bogie]

Is just the chaos you don't like.

Friends are earned, not a given.

Friendship is given in hopes it is given wisely. It can be taken back. There is a link for that .

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Well so do I. But I still suspect something like what Penrose calls non-algorithmic.

I've thought that way for a long time, but they're getting close HERE... and HERE and HERE...

"In quantum mechanics, the spin-statistics theorem relates the spin of a particle to the particle statistics it obeys. The spin of a particle is its intrinsic angular momentum (that is, the contribution to the total angular momentum which is not due to the motion of the particle). All particles have either integer spin or half-integer spin (in units of the reduced Planck constant ~). The theorem states that: the wave function of a system of identical integer-spin particles has the same value when the positions of any two particles are swapped. Particles with wavefunctions symmetric under exchange are called bosons; the wave function of a system of identical half-integer spin particles changes sign when two particles are swapped. Particles with wavefunctions anti-symmetric under exchange are called fermions. Spin statistics theorem implies that half-integer spin particles are subject to the Pauli exclusion principle, while integer-spin particles are not. Only one Fermion can occupy a given quantum state at any time, while the number of bosons that can occupy a quantum state is not restricted."

[Bogie]

The ultimate claustrophobia.

Yet, Mel and I are only a hair apart.

OK, I'm going to ask you to tell us more ... against my better judgement. It is April fools day.

[Bogie]

I've thought that way for a long time, but they're getting close HERE... and HERE and HERE...

No bad. I have a hunch we will be getting into some of that.

[austintorn@aol.com]

OK, I'm going to ask you to tell us more ... against my better judgement. It is April fools day.

She will explain… our secret relationship. (Don't tell anyone.)

Hair today; gone tomorrow.

[labelwench]

She will explain… our secret relationship. (Don't tell anyone.)

Hair today; gone tomorrow.

Or, if you are two bunnies in a basket, 'hare today', gone tomorrow......lol.......

[melanie]

She will explain… our secret relationship. (Don't tell anyone.)

Who? else knows about this ?

[labelwench]

Who? else knows about this ?

No-Body.

I think that's what Mel is trying to tell me.

No-Body.

No hare.

No hair.

No problem?

[melanie]

I think that's what Mel is trying to tell me.

The 'I' in 'I think' has as much substance as the 'it' in 'it rains.'