So many paths to the same destination,
would, but I could, experience them all...
Bogie (07-29-2010)
Wisdom springs from unexpected sources. Take care of her.
BTW, I am well versed in taking in life and its surroundings. I am blessed with a view from my backyard of a large patch of sky and last night I spent part of the evening sitting there enjoying the beautiful cloud display that followed huge storms in my area.
labelwench (07-29-2010)
I care about the common denominator of "alternative view" in conjunction with the idea of what a TOE is or is not. You are using scientific words in QWC. In the depth of my mind these words represent well established meaning by the community of past and present scientists. I will be silent if and only if you defined your own words or vocabulary or own language beside physics and math. Really, it's an insult to my education in science although I don't have a perfect one.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Bogie (07-29-2010)
Superforce is also called antigravity, the one that actually causes the expansion. Bear in mind, this is highly conjectured not proven. That is why hardly any scientist wants to talk about it. It is equivalent to the cosmological constant of GR.Originally Posted by Bogie
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Bogie (07-29-2010)
That is absolutely a welcome thought and I will take you up for it.Originally Posted by Bogie
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Bogie (07-29-2010)
I can link you to the glossary but be alerted to the fact that much of that document is out of date and I reserve the right to change any of it at my discretion. The Glossary is near the end. It should keep you occupied for some time. http://qwc-document.blogspot.com/201...ring-at-t.html
Some very interesting exchanges on this thread today.
As the thread owner, Bogie, you have been placed in a holding/defensive position, yet open to new input.
Antonio, as your main participant in this dialogue has been playing a bit of the 'devil's advocate'.
Melanie, in dropping by, was consistent to the position by which I know her best, and it remains interesting to see what direction the day and this thread spins in next.
So many paths to the same destination,
would, but I could, experience them all...
Bogie (07-29-2010)
I have to stop at the point where you mentioned the word "energy" although it is a definition as a measure of change it is a measure of physical change. In physics it is a change of force or change of distance or both. However, in GR both force and distance is replaced by the metric tensor and the change in the curvature of this tensor is the expansion. Since the curvature is inversely related to the radius of curvature the larger the radius the smaller is the curvature and spacetime flatten out. But the genius of Einstein equated this metric tensor to the stress tensor as a function of local energy-momentum stress tensor bear in mind that this is a 4 by 4 matrix with 16 functional variables the energy components vary according to special relativity while the 4D-momenta can have any values the combined effect is infinite number of possible solutions.Originally Posted by Bogie
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
labelwench (07-29-2010)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)