Quantum Wave Cosmology is my TOE :)

[Bogie]

Is there is a good way to start off a thread where I’m are going to try tell all the other contemplative and intelligent people in the forum my thinking about a subject that we can really only have opinions about and speculate about?

First let me say that this thread is not about science and does not focus on advancing science. The ideas and speculations are not predictions, they are just my current views and they will change as a result of this thread and the other threads in this forum. Everything I post on this thread is intended to be about things that we do not know and don’t presently have the tools to investigate. This is about my personal speculations that pick up where known testable proved science leaves off.

Quantum Wave Cosmology (QWC)

Given the Big Bang, the observed expansion of the universe is explained, or is it? Big Bang Theory unfortunately does not include what caused the Big Bang event. Scientists say we don’t know and some say we can’t know. There is no known physics that can be shown to neatly account for the event or for the source of the matter and energy required to orchestrate the event.

QWC is speculation about the nature of the universe, energy, and how energy density limits and thresholds account for the Big Bang. It is speculation about the mechanics of the Big Bang event and where that kind of thinking leads. What I mean by “where that kind of thinking leads” is that once I felt like my speculations about the cause of the Big Bang satisfied my pea brain, I found myself speculating upon speculation. This thread goes way beyond where a dedicated science professional would ever dare to go; it goes beyond where anyone would go if they didn’t form a personal view of the cause of the Big Bang, and it simply supposes to present an un-testable complete view of cosmology where I toy with ideas about mass and gravity, dark matter and dark energy, infinity, the generation and evolution of life, new physics, new definitions of terms like energy, mass, gravity, arenas, the landscape of the greater universe, limits and thresholds, energy quantization, micro and macro levels of order, and all sorts of things that come up as a result of all of that including the philosophy of QWC.

[labelwench]

Hello Bogie,

I do not doubt that you shall find some to join you in your speculations.

For myself, there is plenty that I speculate and act upon.

I trust that those areas where my skills and experience are not best suited, shall be diligently attended by those whose interests lay in such domain.

All the best in this venture.

Regards,

LW

[Bogie]

Thank you LW, I trust that is so.

[Mikal]

Is there is a good way to start off a thread where I’m are going to try tell all the other contemplative and intelligent people in the forum my thinking about a subject that we can really only have opinions about and speculate about?

First let me say that this thread is not about science and does not focus on advancing science. The ideas and speculations are not predictions, they are just my current views and they will change as a result of this thread and the other threads in this forum. Everything I post on this thread is intended to be about things that we do not know and don’t presently have the tools to investigate. This is about my personal speculations that pick up where known testable proved science leaves off.

Quantum Wave Cosmology (QWC)

Given the Big Bang, the observed expansion of the universe is explained, or is it? Big Bang Theory unfortunately does not include what caused the Big Bang event. Scientists say we don’t know and some say we can’t know. There is no known physics that can be shown to neatly account for the event or for the source of the matter and energy required to orchestrate the event.

QWC is speculation about the nature of the universe, energy, and how energy density limits and thresholds account for the Big Bang. It is speculation about the mechanics of the Big Bang event and where that kind of thinking leads. What I mean by “where that kind of thinking leads” is that once I felt like my speculations about the cause of the Big Bang satisfied my pea brain, I found myself speculating upon speculation. This thread goes way beyond where a dedicated science professional would ever dare to go; it goes beyond where anyone would go if they didn’t form a personal view of the cause of the Big Bang, and it simply supposes to present an un-testable complete view of cosmology where I toy with ideas about mass and gravity, dark matter and dark energy, infinity, the generation and evolution of life, new physics, new definitions of terms like energy, mass, gravity, arenas, the landscape of the greater universe, limits and thresholds, energy quantization, micro and macro levels of order, and all sorts of things that come up as a result of all of that including the philosophy of QWC.

Hi Bogie...as I am particularly curious about speculations on what may have caused the Big Bang I will follow your thread here and am looking forward to you sharing your current views. I also wish you the best in this venture and am quite sure that what you present will be doubly thought provoking...

Regards Mikal

[austintorn@aol.com]

How about the so-called Toy Model of the BIVERSE, an event of a forward universe in time and a backward one, conserving energy, as it must, as much as do the emissions of pairs of particles and their anti-particles out of the vacuum energy of the quantum realm, or even this state as a source, all of this, in our reality canceling out, as seen with positive mass-energy vs. our negative gravity energy, to zero; yet, the eternal, causeless ground-state, possibly as near to nothing as anything could be, ever remains, as it always was and will be, since it could not possibly come from a Total Nothing, nor be made of infinite regress, thus making it the perfectly natural and only state of affairs possible, its potential neither creatable nor destroyable, as it was never created nor can it end?

[Bogie]

Hi Bogie...as I am particularly curious about speculations on what may have caused the Big Bang I will follow your thread here and am looking forward to you sharing your current views. I also wish you the best in this venture and am quite sure that what you present will be doubly thought provoking...

Regards Mikal

Thank you Mikal, you are too kind.

[Bogie]

How about the so-called Toy Model of the BIVERSE, an event of a forward universe in time and a backward one, conserving energy, as it must, as much as do the emissions of pairs of particles and their anti-particles out of the vacuum energy of the quantum realm, or even this state as a source, all of this, in our reality canceling out, as seen with positive mass-energy vs. our negative gravity energy, to zero; yet, the eternal, causeless ground-state, possibly as near to nothing as anything could be, ever remains, as it always was and will be, since it could not possibly come from a Total Nothing, nor be made of infinite regress, thus making it the perfectly natural and only state of affairs possible, its potential neither creatable nor destroyable, as it was never created nor can it end?

That is it exactly. Great minds, right.

[austintorn@aol.com]

The great minds, that have come from the mindless (for then there is no regress of …MIND having to form Mind to form mind) have deduced the unspecific, indefinite, eternal, causeless ground-state that produced its arbtrary and local specifics and definite forms that worked, no time being special, since any time, no place as specific, since anywhere, no special laws, since many possible, no form right or wrong but only that some forms may be stable enough to continue on, into complexity, since they were also flexible enough not to be inert.

[Bogie]

The great minds, that have come from the mindless (for then there is no regress of …MIND having to form Mind to form mind) have deduced the unspecific, indefinite, eternal, causeless ground-state that produced its arbtrary and local specifics and definite forms that worked, no time being special, since any time, no place as specific, since anywhere, no special laws, since many possible, no form right or wrong but only that some forms may be stable enough to continue on, into complexity, since they were also flexible enough not to be inert.

I couldn't say it better. Anything finite is almost nothing, almost nowhere, almost never relative to the infinite.

[Mikal]

A question. So are you still going to preview your current views here, from your thoughts and your words??


Regards Mikal