"occam's razor reloaded"

[humanbydefault]

I've been away for too long and I miss you guys a lot!

I have very good news for the new members that I haven't got the opportunity to meet yet and the old ones with which I argued many times in the past. I have always loved those discussions by the way.

Today I have a announcement to you:

I have recently published my new book that I titled "Lex Parsimoniae" (Occam's razor Reloaded).

It is about the same view I had five years ago when I published my first book "Warning Scientific Discretion Advised" only that today and after more than 5 years from its publication I FINALLY HAVE NUMBERS TO PROVE IT.

I will give you guys the link that will familiarize you with my Theory. I has always been concerned with the nature of Reality and I have evidences that support my arguments. Luckily those evidences are in fact PUBLIC RECORDS (!)

This is the link I welcome all of you (both old friends and new ones) to visit:

http://integrallife.com/member/miguel-de-zayas/blog

The reason I published my articles there for the first time was because there is still a member of that site named Giorgio Piacenza Cabrera who authored an interesting article titled "The Mystery Behind 137"

The main focus of my latest research and the main theme of my second book.

The numbers that I have in my articles could be understood by a 12 year old boy or girl so don't be afraid!

Just one last thing I want you to know whether you decided to read my thoughts or not:

The Occam's razor states that "The simplest solution is usually the correct one" and it has always been my belief that the Theory of Everything must be the better example of the most important philosophical tennet humanity has ever had.

My theory is based in the simplest mathematical model (The square root of 2) and an entirely new interpretation to what numbers represent.

If you lose the link don;t worry! You can always reach me there by googling my name:

MIGUEL DE ZAYAS

Always your friend for every member of this site.

God Bless You All!

[PoPpAScience]

The Occam's razor states that "The simplest solution is usually the correct one" and it has always been my belief that the Theory of Everything must be the better example of the most important philosophical tennet humanity has ever had.

I love your belief in your statement. I feel very strongly that only a Philosopher of the modern age can express a better example of the "TOE" then those of the past. No scientist of the modern age can achieve a new incite to the "TOE", because they spend to much time restricting their thinking, instead of expanding it like Einstein did.

[humanbydefault]

I spent the first part of "Father's Day" finishing the last details of my new book "SEVEN". It is from today a REALITY. I've been collecting, revising and extracting the best of the best of everything I have found out after I published "Lex Parsimoniae" at the beginning of this month. Finally I sent the files to Createspace and to LULU and both publishers have it. LULU already has it in both forms: e-book (free download) and as a 8 1/2'' x 11'' (softcore) book. The price couldn;t be better... $7.77 I did the same with "Lex Parismoniae" when I assigned the perfect price of $13.70 (Alpha). "SEVEN" is my jewel. In it I published my latest finds from the final discovery of 137 inside the model I presented for Reality, the physical explanation for the semitones in Music, the determination of Plank's constant exponential (X 10-34) and the physical meaning of those decimals by tens. The dice solution for 137 and the anomaly in the dice solution in favor of the 7 (seven) result. I included the link between a possible model for electronic configuration in atoms based on my Model and I lay down the basis to understand the inherent perturbation factor as an integral part of the atomic structure from the very first orbit = Time "0". It's been a long sleepless month but I feel so happy that I can describe it in words.

I hope you enjoyed my articles even when you find them incomprehensible or impossible. I do not expect everyone to agree with me (that never happens) but time will have the last word as always has.

It seems as if I started just yesterday with my first book about the weirdness of Quantum Mechanics and after more than 8 years of self studies and hard work in the observation of patterns in "Lottery games" I finally found what I was looking for all these years.

Today I offer the world with numbers. Not words and empty reasoning... Numbers! They don't lie and they don't have agenda either. I have worked with constants to prove my interpretation about what numbers represent and I met face-to-face with Reality's most intimate secrets. That I have absolutely no doubts. It will take time before those whose life has been entirely offered to orthodox theories begin to realize of the benefits and promises those conclusions I published today may bring to all of us. I'm in no rush. What is in paper now is safe and protected. The worse it could happen to anyone who has spent his life looking for something is the possibility of forgery and fraud. Credit must belong to those who deserved it after long days of search and long nights without rest.

Today I can sleep well and I can thank God for the precious gift he offered a long time ago: Logic and Common Sense.

God Bless you All!

[austintorn@aol.com]

I like CreateSpace a bit better than Lulu, for they give free ISBN numbers, put the book on Amazon, and have more options for other outlets, such as Barnes and Noble, although Lulu now has epub format which allows books to go to book-reader devices such as the new Apple ipad.

[humanbydefault]

You're absolutely right about createspace. The quality of the white paper and the brightness og the image on the cover is phenomenal. LULU has some advatages over the first though. You can revise your work in LULU without having to order a "proof" to be sent to you after a week. You can revise, download and check it out all int 1-2-3 and have a whole new book out there in seconds if you need it. Createspace is slower but they have seriou and responsible people watching over your work at all steps of the process. They advise you if your pictures have a low quality definition and they keep warning you until the last moment. Also they have an excellent presentation in Amazon. If you go to my book you could see how you open it and even read a few pages from the introduction and from the end. LULU has no one watching the process and their old cover maker is too primitive and complicate that you get frustrated from time to time. There is a new cover designer software in place but to be honest... I have neither the time nor the interest to learn it. I was in a hurry to publish my articles so I did it the best I could. They are both great! They are all we've got to make real our dreams to be able to "say something" we consider imporatnt to the rest of the World. You may never sell a single piece but you feel proud that you finally accomplished an important mission in your life. I see it this way but as always it is with these sort of things I could also be wrong.
In two words... Great experience.

[humanbydefault]

The other day I was doing some research on my own and I found that Newton had also published in his book 'Optika' an intriguing theory about the nature and origin of colors (in light). Although I have to admit that I do agree with him about the notion of seven fundamental colors and the "semitones" missing in the scale, as it is true and an undeniable fact with our music and our Reality, I have to admit that Goethe was also correct when he accused Newton of being conveniently selective regarding the distance of the light source from the prism to the screen. Goethe (without even knowing what he discovered) was able to interpret a "relativistic effect" of light with his very eyes!

What Goethe was referring when he observed those bright and dark areas along the light beam was the actual spectrum observed in the 'Double Slit Experiment'!!! Complete cycles of Reality cancelling eachother in 3D space as they overlap one another. What Newton experienced passing light throughtout a prism was just the 'edges' of the perturbation caused by the 'shrinking space-time' due to the conversion between 8 cycles into just 7!

Both geniuses wer absolutely correct however the one who never got the chance to be considerred the author of a theory was also the one and only who saw even farther what was going on... Science sometimes takes time (too much in some cases) to recognize its true heroes.