Vote For a TOE

[spacedout]

It seems to me that a good toe must explain what dimensions are and how they are related to time. For instance how are three dimensions made, is movment an identity transfer in linear time, -- knowing this stuff is necessary.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Dimensions and time are not made__Our 3D Universe has always been__Eternal...

Only religious imagination looks for creations__In the Absolute, no creations Exist...

The Finite Universe Formed__Geo-Combinatorically and Bio-Dynamically, from It's Eternal 3D FS-Mass, EM-Field...

It's All Simple Combinatoric Ratio-Logic__Field to Structured Matter, and Dynamic Ratio-Complexity of Evolution__Us Bio-Bugs...

Time is simply, measurement of the above__It's not an entity...

[vacuum-mechanics]

Before improving the two theories, we have to look at their serious weak points as the clue. And everyone who familiar with both theories would know that both of them were subject to the crucial philosophic problem, i.e. the mechanism which explain how the theory work!

Let us first see an example problem of (special) relativity which says that a moving object’s mass is increased as its speed is increased, but there is no explanation why and how it is! Another example in (general) relativity is that space-time could be curved; the problem is how empty space (without anything) is curved?

For quantum mechanics, an example is the problem of particle-wave duality concept which could not be explained how and why particle such as electron can manifest as both particle and wave? Another famous problem is the wave collapse interpretation which was used to explain how electron particles could dividein two parts in order to pass two slits simultaneously, and then combine back to the single particle!

From the mentioned problems, we got the clue that both the two theories lack of the mechanism which explain how the theory work! And to do the job, we must have some common physical thing that could provide the mechanism for both the two theories. Also it should involve with the same vacuum space for both theories which was mentioned early. In the next post we will see what could be the same common physical thing which involve with vacuum space.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

Dear austintorn@aol.com and friends,

Let us first suppose that there is something (like aether) physically existed invacuum space, and then we will have a physical mechanism which could explain how relativity and quantum theories work. This will give the completion of both the theories which were used as the tool for opening the gate to the TOE!

Conventionally, both relativity and quantum are non-aether based theories, i.e. they are involved with empty space concept. According to our new assumption that there is something physically existed invacuum space, then they will change to aether based theories. Indeed, the newaether based relativity and quantum theories could solve all their weak points mentioned! (Please see detail in the scientific paper “Completed Einstein special theory of relativity”, “Completed Einstein general theory of relativity” and “Completed quantum mechanical theory” in my website.)

Up to now, we will show how aether based theory could pave the way to the TOE, and first let talk about electromagnetic force which is one of the four basic force of nature. So we have to consider Maxwell electromagnetic theory (that was used for explainingelectromagnetic force) which conventionally is also non-aether based theory. Again, we have to improve by changing it to aether based theory in order to get the mechanism forelectromagnetic force, please see in next post.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[spacedout]

Loid -- I don't think is science to assume that three dimensions are not explainable -- there isn't any evidence to show contrary -- however, it can be seen that there is only one choice of linear movement (quantitative?) -- forget direction if there isn't any other movement in the universe to relate to -- two directions have two choices of movement and three directions have 3 choices of movement. Easy to do this -- have an x-group, a y-group and a z-group and randomly choose a a quantum step in one of the 3-directions (backward or forward in time).

A crossed chain wave manifold that propagates through the balled time-line would have x-manifolds, y-manifolds and z-manifolds of various sixes coresponting to equal number of rows to time-steps per row S -- this means that the velocity of each component would equal the function of the diagonal formula S = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^1/2. S is the total number of steps in a crossed chain wave quantum particle representing the average speed of light across a medium. S number of points will travel first across the x-axis and then across the y-axis and then across the z-axis in this sequence to make a diagonal steeped movement to the coordence of space. The speed across the diagonal will be a constant value of S.

I have shown how nature could use a lattuce system to form a quantum wave that can travel at the speed of light in any direction. The results show that this can be done by nature and you have made an unscientific judgement that isn't really science. I do know that your paradym is fundimental to old or moder physics -- however, seeing the world in multidimensions and a true continuum in any direction doesn't explain why we have the dimensions we do nor does it explain the arrow of time and the quantitativeness of our world or it interconnectiveness.

Exen though the world may not be a true lattuce work it may just be a 3-group system that simulates 3-right angles x,y,z but we that live in it and are part of it will see three-direction and relative movements and all those other dimensions that are time-related. I'm predjudiced by this idea and choose " A concept for a universal aether " as my choice for a theory -- it explains so much, gravity, dark matter and energy, electromatic forces, the charges for quarks and leptons, the composition of light and matter, why everything is quantitave and interconnected, it also explains why color chromodynamics if part of up or down quarks in matter, and it also explains inertia or the arrow of time. I don't see this in any of the other theories.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Gerald, I haven't said it isn't explainable__I simply stated it's not reducible below a three dimensional field. There's nothing stopping us doing the mechanics within the three dimensional field, especially by using a correspondence logic of DaveW's, mine, Tim's and Graham's models assistance. Why I state it's not possible to reduce it below a fundamental triad of matter, energy and motion is the fact, that if any one of these entity states and forces is removed, it's not a visible scientific model, just as C.S. Pierce's cosmology showed more than 100 years ago. Science doesn't allow the liberty of us working in a nothing space, to do science, as that wouldn't be science__It would be imaginary science, and not real__therefore I choose to work within a real and possible scientific model, only...

Loid -- I don't think is science to assume that three dimensions are not explainable -- there isn't any evidence to show contrary -- however, it can be seen that there is only one
choice of linear movement (quantitative?)[If you don't have a 3D object/field__what's there to move...?] -- forget direction if there isn't any other movement in the universe to relate to -- two directions have two choices of movement and three directions have 3 choices of movement.[Directions don't move__Must have a fundamental matter entity to move] Easy to do this -- have an x-group, a y-group and a z-group and randomly choose a a quantum step in one of the 3-directions (backward or forward in time).

A crossed chain wave manifold that propagates through the balled time-line would have x-manifolds, y-manifolds and z-manifolds of various sixes coresponting to equal number of rows to time-steps per row S -- this means that the velocity of each component would equal the function of the diagonal formula S = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^1/2. S is the total number of steps in a crossed chain wave quantum particle representing the average speed of light across a medium. S number of points will travel first across the x-axis and then across the y-axis and then across the z-axis in this sequence to make a diagonal steeped movement to the coordence of space. The speed across the diagonal will be a constant value of S.

I have shown how nature could use a lattuce system to form a quantum wave that can travel at the speed of light in any direction. The results show that this can be done by nature and you have made an unscientific judgement that isn't really science.[No, I've simply stated the matter entity 3D space is absolutely first required, to even have a logical or mathematical conversation about it...] I do know that your paradym is fundimental to old or moder physics -- however, seeing the world in multidimensions and a true continuum in any direction doesn't explain why we have the dimensions we do nor does it explain the arrow of time and the quantitativeness of our world or it interconnectiveness.[What I've stated isn't stopping you from filling in the internal mechanics of the 3D matter entity space...]

Even though the world may not be a true lattuce work it may just be a 3-group system that simulates 3-right angles x,y,z but we that live in it and are part of it will see three-direction and relative movements and all those other dimensions that are time-related. I'm predjudiced by this idea and choose " A concept for a universal aether " as my choice for a theory -- it explains so much, gravity, dark matter and energy, electromatic forces, the charges for quarks and leptons, the composition of light and matter, why everything is quantitave and interconnected, it also explains why color chromodynamics if part of up or down quarks in matter, and it also explains inertia or the arrow of time. I don't see this in any of the other theories.

Well, you shouldn't view my model as inteferring with any mechanics you are speaking of, as it does not... All I've done is make a general logical necessity observation, that the absolute fundamental state of matter, mass/energy, and motion is required to be no less than an eternal minimum of a 3D triadic state space__as any less and the entire model becomes impossible of existence...

[vacuum-mechanics]

[FONT=Arial]
..........
..........

Up to now, we will show how aether based theory could pave the way to the TOE, and first let talk about electromagnetic force which is one of the four basic force of nature. So we have to consider Maxwell electromagnetic theory (that was used for explainingelectromagnetic force) which conventionally is also non-aether based theory. Again, we have to improve by changing it to aether based theory in order to get the mechanism forelectromagnetic force, please see in next post.

Dear austintorn@aol.com and friends,

Everyone who familiar with conventional charge particles (electron and proton) would know that there is no explanation why and how they create electromagnetic field! Armed with aether based electromagnetic field theory, it is easy to show that it is due to themechanism of vacuum medium (something like aether)!

According to our new concept vacuum mechanics (mechanism of vacuum medium), electron is something like tiny black hole, i.e. condensed of vacuum medium. Immerging in vacuum medium space, theblack hole of electron will attract (suck) the medium around and creating its internal contraction stress what which was called as electrostatic field. And moving electron will rotate while dragging the medium around and creating magnetostatic field!

For the same idea, proton could also be considered as a biggertiny black hole. According to the new concept of tiny black holes, we would found that different size of tiny black holes are attract, while the same size repel! And it is more rational than the conventional explanation which assumed two kinds of charges.

In summary, electromagnetic force was arisen from electron and proton (something like tiny black holeofvacuum medium) which create the internal stress in medium around! (Please see detail in the paper “Completed Maxwell electromagnetic field theory” in my website.) In the next post, we will show that the new concept of electron and proton are tiny black holes, has crucial further consequence!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[spacedout]

I believe there are different phases of the aether. A wave must propagate through the aether making it a separate dynamic system that leads to another phase that forms quantum particles that have one speed for the conditions of the aether (rarefaction or compaction of). These particles represent field particles that act as a fluid that can form a vortex exhibiting magnetism-- in this case the field particles act as a force like photons exhibit on large particles.

I see magnetism and static field charge as two phenomina. A static field charge will compact the aether of the core and also drive two opposite charges together while like charges will repel. For instance there must be smaller vacuum and pressure field particles that make up the photon to give it a charge -- opposite field particles between the charged field photons will cancel from vector movement into random ambient space much like random movement of air molecules can propagate linear waves.

A vortex on the other hand would involve a fluid field movement like a toris which has a vacuum at one side of the donut hole and a pressure side in which the field passes outward. An electron can be driven through space by a collapsing field -- the field is like a retreating wind the forms a vortex around the electron which has mass and must accelerate backward. Another field pulse reverses the process and an oscellation of the field can generate magnetic and electrostatic waves that are electromagnetic.

[vacuum-mechanics]

electromagnetic force[/B] was arisen from electron and proton (something like tiny black holeofvacuum medium) which create the internal stress in medium around! (Please see detail in the paper “Completed Maxwell electromagnetic field theory” in my website.) In the next post, we will show that the new concept of electron and proton are tiny black holes, has crucial further consequence!

Dear austintorn@aol.com and friends,

Now we will consider two other basic forces of nature, i.e. weak force and strong force, which were defined as the force that hold proton and electron (forming to be a neutron) and proton and proton (or neutron) together forming to be a nucleus. Anyway, there is no explanation what is it and why it is so? Armed with our new concept that electron and proton are (something like) tiny black holes ofvacuum medium), then it is easy to understand theseforces as follow.

When electron and proton are closed they will attract each other, but they are not attach together because ofvacuum medium between. Anyway, if they are forced by external force that is bigger than the tensile force ofthe medium between, then they will attach together (forming to be a neutron) under their attractive force which was called as weak force!

Actually, at a certain distance apart, proton and proton will attract each other, and if we try to place them at a closer distance then they will repel each other. But if we force them close together with an external force which is bigger than the tensile force ofthe medium between, then they will attach together (forming to be a nucleus) under their attractive force which was called as strong force!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[austintorn@aol.com]

TOE Searchlight




(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLh0laF4vXY)

[austintorn@aol.com]

Hi Nimit,

I could go along with particle cores being holes in the fabric of space, which is what a black hole is, I guess. So, these holes would contain "not space", whatever that is, a kind of singularity which pushes all aside and onto the boundary of the hole that is the particle core.

This means, perhaps, that matter has a spectacular curvature, much more than, say, gravity.