"ancient mysteries int the search for the square root of 2" [reality...?]

[humanbydefault]

“GUYS! THE AMAZING RESULTS JUST KEEP ON COMING!!!”
Take another close look at the representation of the square root of 2:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root_of_2
577/408! *The Ancient Indian Aproximation.
Does it ring a bell? Please guys go to my latest blog “Did you just say…?” and see the Egyptian Fraction once again!
5/121 = 1/25 + 1/757… (!) 757 = 577!
Then 408 = 4 + 0 + 8 = 12! And 1 + 2 = 3! Also 4 + 3 = 7! (5) ‘Half-cycle ahead in time’.
Let’s operate on the first: 577/408, shall we?
577 = 19! So…
19/408 = 0.0465686! = 35! 3 (5).
However
577 = 5 + 2 + 2 = 9! Where 9/408 = 0.0220588 = 25! = 2 (5) as you can see I just deducted one complete cycle (5) + (5) from 19 into 9 by converting both 7s into their own ‘object configurations’.
Let’s continue…
Assuming 408 = 12! Then:
9/12 = 0.75 where 7 (5)! Or also 9/3 = 3!
Let’s take the original 557/408 = 1.414215686
(1414215686) = (1 + 4) + (1 + 4) + (2 + 1) + (5) + (6 + 8 + 6)
(5) + (5) + (3) + (5) + (1 + 3 + 1) = (3) + (20)! Where 20 according to the Mayan numerical system and mine equals 2 complete cycles!
Then look on top where you find this quote:
The quick approximation 99/70for the square root of two is most frequently used. Despite having a denominator of only 70, it differs from the correct value by less than 1/10,000.” (Wikipedia)
99 = 18! And 0.257142… or the same message over and over again:
2 (5) and 7 (1 + 4) and 2… 2 (5) = -7! 7 (5) = -7! And 2 obviously changing sign as the consequence of the following E.R.P.s!
This is one more evidence that my system works and that Reality does have its own language differing a great deal from the way mathematicians are dealing in modern times… I often wonder myself if ancient civilizations used a similar approach considered for some as “pure numerology”?
What do you think?

[labelwench]

Summer at the forum, and not too many of the 'number-crunchers' around at present.

Sorry that I cannot provide you with useful commentary.

Business math is my strength, also weights and measures, visualizing what volumes will fit into what spaces etc. All math sets that one uses in daily life. Conceptual math is not my forte.

Unfortunate that Antonio has not been at the forum since May or thereabouts. He is rather the number specialist, and some of the other fellows too.

The old adage of 'You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink', seems applicable at times.

Patience.........rather like fishing..........sooner or later they're going to bite.......