gravity and theory of everything

[Username is valid and not]

It’s only velocity

Velocity is infinite and unidirectional.

When two infinitely large velocities collide at any angle other than a zero angle, a disturbance is created. Forces of attraction or repulsion do not exist and the only result is the interaction between the two velocities.

The disturbance can exist in two states; creation and destruction.

The disturbance will be subject to a gradual degradation once the interaction between the colliding velocities slows down and transfers to its surroundings.

The disturbance can have an infinite amount of shapes, can be infinitely small and have an infinitely large velocity, can be infinitely large and infinitely slow but can never be static. Every velocity, energy and mass is relative.

A stream of energy contains a directional mass of disturbance. The smaller the combined disturbance, the greater the velocity of the stream. The greater the disturbance, the smaller velocity of the stream.

The disturbances are a basic product, all of the observed effects arise as a consequence of the colliding masses within a stream of disturbance in space.

Pawel Kraszewski

[vacuum-mechanics]

It’s only velocity
..........
.............

Dear Username….,

Velocity of what?

How velocity relate to “gravity and theory of everything”?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[pkgravity]

If we do not known from where come from gravitation, energy end velocity then let try imagin two velocity's. We do not have energi, mass end relative velocity. Wen we meet two velocity's under 180 degrees against each other, then rise point with real relative energy, mass end velocity.

below image

X (reference to the speed, mass end energy)


V∞ e=mv V∞
-----------------------------> X <--------------------------------

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear pkgravity,

It seems that you have the problem in using English language, so it is very difficult for other people to understand your thread. Please concentrate on improving your English!

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[pkgravity]

so this is a problem, but I hope you understand what I mean
If we assume that there is such a size as infinity, for example, where the universe ends? Of course, the distance is never infinite. Likewise, we can divide into smaller and smaller objects up to infinity. Therefore we can assume that there are no finite size, in theory. Going forward has already been observed that smaller particles have higher relative velocity, for example, photons. Let us assume that smaller particles have an even greater rate than that observed today. Therefore, this walking trail will assume that the smaller the object the greater the speed. Created so that the molecule must be composed of a curved velocity resulting in a swirl. In nature, there is no such thing because sharing such turbulence will always be formed smaller, to infinity.

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear pkgravity,

Actually I am not clear what really you are talking about! Remember that this forum is about theory of everything which is the widest and most complicate theory, i.e. it should explain all the existing theories! So what you have to do is not just having an idea, instead you must have detail explanation, what is it, why and how it is be so?

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[pkgravity]

the problem is in English, or content?

I guess you want proof, if you apply the right mathematical formulated by Werner Heisenberg in 1927, which is easy to confirm on the example of counting continuously variable transmission. We come to the conclusion that you can not use "1" because something does not exist in nature. Each object consists of or is a component of another. Therefore, forming my theory of everything, I can not use math. This course can be drawn and how can you can draw on is to consist of single points, but the theory has to relate to real world. Therefore, we can not use math in my theory.

[vacuum-mechanics]

the problem is in English, or content?

Dear pkgravity,

Both!

I guess you want proof, if you apply the right mathematical formulated by Werner Heisenberg in 1927, which is easy to confirm on the example of counting continuously variable transmission. We come to the conclusion that you can not use "1" because something does not exist in nature. Each object consists of or is a component of another. Therefore, forming my theory of everything, I can not use math. This course can be drawn and how can you can draw on is to consist of single points, but the theory has to relate to real world. Therefore, we can not use math in my theory.

As I have mentioned early that you must have detail explanation in your theory, what it is, why and how it is be so.

Sincerely,
Nimit
-------------------
www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[pkgravity]

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/gene...e_magic_number

[spacedout]

I find the 3-slit experiment enlightening -- only two components for the pattern. As far as gravity is concerned there are two popular conclusions one is the quantum particle theory for gravitons and the other is curvature of space. A graviton is a force field that drives mass together and is a particle of deffinite size and energy -- it seems this is true but there isn't a given reason for the size and energy of this particle -- it just has to be to fit the phenomina of force fields. Curving space is another thing -- how is this done -- no descriptive answer. I believe in a quantum x,y,z stepped aether time-line cycle that makes our universe -- a step is energy, time and distance all in one. A cycled universe will have each step moved backwards or forwards in time causing a change in the shape of the path (vibrations) causing the balled stepped path to relocate outward -- the string feature of the path will tend to pull everything together and limit its outward movement (big crunch). In-line steps across the path will freeze time and this is the reason for all forces including gravity -- the denser the medium the slower the velocity of light just like in the dense gravity of a black hole.