[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE

What are the hadamart matrices used for?

Additions of Hadamard matrices give values for space charges, color charges, weak charges, and electric charges.
Multiplications of Hadamard matrices give values for all masses of all elementary particles.


Hugh,

TQS (the name i gave to my research: Theory of Quantized Space) interpretes the fine structure constant as the product of linear momentum and the ratio of quantized space over continuous space.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

Additions of Hadamard matrices give values for space charges, color charges, weak charges, and electric charges.
Multiplications of Hadamard matrices give values for all masses of all elementary particles.

Is there any other mathematical operation that is done with Hadamard matrices apart from these?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE

Is there any other mathematical operation that is done with Hadamard matrices apart from these?

I have no idea? But see the site

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HadamardMatrix.html

note: the matrices i used are special cases of Hadamard's. My matrices are alternately symmetrical for values of 1 and -1.

[subversion]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

TQS (the name i gave to my research: Theory of Quantized Space) interpretes the fine structure constant as the product of linear momentum and the ratio of quantized space over continuous space.

how does one determine the ratio of quantized space to continuous space?

also, does this Heim theory predict how the universe began?

[hdeasy]

In Heim theory there is only metronic, i.e. quantised, space. Heim's cosmology, about which I. Von Ludwiger is writing a book now, sees the beginning as three intersecting spheres - as I understand it, by one of those amazing numerical coincidences (e.g. 1/137 for fine structure constant), the radii of these 3 spheres were all about 1 meter (+- 10% or so for 2 of them). Then one chronon elapsed and the spheres split in surface area to give more but smaller ones. This continued, chronon by chronon, for a very long time - much longer than 15 billion years - until a point was reached where it was propitious for matter to emerge, whereupon it did so. That's Heim Cosmology in a nutshell - Watch this space for Von L's book when it hits the shelves. Unnhh - here's relevant quote from Auerbach & Von L's paper:

" D1 = 0.90992 m, D2 = 1.06426 m, D3 = 3.70121 m.

This trinity of spheres has important bearings on the structure of elementary particles. From the first moment on the univese begun to expand, though at a slower rate than is presently predicted on the basis of the red shift of distant galaxis (see the Appendix). Heim’s theory results in a present age of the universe approximately equal to 5.45 ´ 10**107 years, and a diameter D of about 6.37 ´ 10**109 light years. During most of its existence the universe consisted of an empty metronic lattice, whose metrons kept getting smaller as the universe grew larger. Eventually, metrons became small enough for matter to come into existence. This may have occurred some 15-40 billion (10 9 ) years ago, at which time matter was created throughout the volume of the

universe. Hence, according to Heim matter did not originate very soon after a "big bang" explosion but more uniformly in scattered "fire-cracker" like bursts, perhaps of galactic proportions. Spontaneous uniform creation of matter, coupled with the partly attractive and partly repulsive force of gravity mentioned in Section 3 resulted in the observed large-scale galactic structure of the universe. Creation of matter continues to this day, though on a very much reduced scale. "

Fascinating, eh?
Hugh.

[Guille]

hdeasy,

What's the title of the book? When is it going to come out?

I am quite interested on reading it. Heim's cosomology is km infront of string theory... As well as in this (the very big), heim theory is also km infront of string theory in the very small...

[hdeasy]

He is still in the process of writing it - I think the publisher already has a deal, but I don't know if the title is yet known. Heim theory is indeed streets ahead of String Theory. Look at e.g. the summary of results on showing how close the predictions are to experiment - outstanding preditions , made 20 years ago for neutrino masses.

[AntonioLao]

I met the co-discoverers of the 1st neutrino when he was a physics professor at Catholic University of America in the early 1970s. His name was Dr. C. Cowan. I told him I would like to do research in plasma physics but wasn't able to get into graduate school at that time. I did apply to 3 but was rejected by all. Now, I lost my opportunity so have to do my own independent research.

[subversion]

Originally Posted by hdeasy

Heim's cosmology sees the beginning as three intersecting spheres. Then one chronon elapsed and the spheres split in surface area to give more but smaller ones. This continued, chronon by chronon, for a very long time until a point was reached where it was propitious for matter to emerge, whereupon it did so.

It sounds kind of vague to me. What gave rise to these three spheres I wonder?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by subversion

how does one determine the ratio of quantized space to continuous space?

in TQS, this is the postulate of the theory. Quantized is the square of energy and continuous space is the product of c and energy and the ratio is the linear momentum of the photon.