ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-11-2005, 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
in TQS, this is the postulate of the theory. Quantized is the square of energy and continuous space is the product of c and energy and the ratio is the linear momentum of the photon.
Doesn't the photon have angular momentum? (and not linear momentum).
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Green Belt

hdeasy's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 51
13 hdeasy is on a distinguished road
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-13-2005, 04:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by <<>>
hdeasy,

Does heim theory also predict the fine structure constant? or any other constants? (pi, planck, grvitational, c...).
Heim theory predicts the fine structure constant (for numerical computation see e.g. bottom of Auerbach and Ludwiger paper quoted above, or selected results in Heim THeory site), the elementary particle masses, coupling constnats and particle lifetimes, though the latter may still be incomplete, which makes predicting all the resonances not so certain.

You don't 'predict' pi - it is just is there, like 3. Pi is given by a Taylor series, on, I think, arccos (-1).

planck, gravitational are 2 of the 4 input physical parameters to the theory. The other 2 are permitivity and permeability in vacuo, and ny Maxwell's equations, which are contained in Heim theory, it is easy to show that c is
:
c= 1\sqrt{permitivity _0 * permeability _0}
Reply With Quote
hdeasy is offlineReport Post
Green Belt

hdeasy's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 51
13 hdeasy is on a distinguished road
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-13-2005, 04:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by subversion
It sounds kind of vague to me. What gave rise to these three spheres I wonder?
I don't know either - I'm hoping von Ludwiger will explain it in his forthcoming book. Otherwise, there might be hint in one of HEim's 2 main books, but it's not easy to pick out the justification there as he often leaves some things to the reader - that's where HEim's successors are doing great work - e.g. Droscher now explicitly deriving the eigen-value equations.
Reply With Quote
hdeasy is offlineReport Post
Green Belt

hdeasy's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 51
13 hdeasy is on a distinguished road
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
12-14-2005, 05:28 PM
hey - there will be an article on Heim in New Scientist on Jan 7th 2006 - check it out: this could be the next big breakthroguh.
Reply With Quote
hdeasy is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Intro to what Supertrings are james l. digol String Theory 29 07-03-2008 03:07 PM
WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB Serge Patlavskiy Theory Characteristics 3 09-11-2007 11:18 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.