"...nobody!"

[humanbydefault]

I study the Hebrew Alphabet and found this statement intriguing....

The prime Number 137 is the sum of the elements of the Holographic Generating Set (27, 37, 73). It appears as a structural prime in both the Divine Prologue and the Logos Holograph. It is profoundly integrated with the Fine Structure Constant that governs the interaction between Light and Matter.

The God of Truth from Isaiah 65 integrates with the Number 137:

The God of Truth



Elohi Amen
= 137


Regards Mikal

Thank you for your comment. I appreciate your thanks to the posting too.

This is what Dr. Ricahrd Feynman said about Alpha that I want you to read:

"... You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!"

What it was said in that quote seems pretty straighforward to me, although it seems not as quite clear for some members here"

He stated back then that we can measure Alpha experimentally... there is no doubts about that issue... Today here are many methods to do such thing: Satellite measurements, and other experimental ways including an attempt made by Dr. Gilson (England) to calculate it empirically by employing 'Prime numbers' by the way.

What is not clear (ever since) is the subject of where it is coming from and whether could there be a Physical Model to represent its origin in the first place.

That is what I have proposed in the Square Root of 2 Model of Reality.

Two issues here! One experimentally which is done earlier in the XXth century and refined somewhat later on and the issue of its origins and empirical representation inside a model of Reality.

Non of that has been proposed by current theories so far. Take music and the nature of colors (Goethe's theory of colours). As for today it is not considered even a Physical theory due to our IGNORANCE in the understanding of Reality. Heisenberg gave his personal opinion about it saying that Newton was the fortunate one who got closer to the Physical truth. I believe it was Heisenberg who was not able to understand how far Goethe was capable of going by actually realizing the relativistic effects of Reality inside a beam of light.

It was a remarkable achievement and so far no one has been close to understand him and this is the year 2010! It is a shame!

As for the numbers that you mentioned earlier in you kind posting is true! Those numbers are key to understand the origin of Alpha and its connection with our Reality.

Those number were at some point posted by me before and I notes that you picked up as quickly as no one. 137 is indeed that representaion of the symmetrical side of the constant.

When I said that I regreat not having a scientific calculator I meant it. I am absolutely sure (convinced) that if someone could make the multiplication of .035 and 999 by themselves as many as 137 times, he or she would be amazed of the results. I bet they will find those lucky trios many many times embedded in the result and the "mirror value" of 14 and 17 all over.

This is just the beginnings of a long Proof... It will take more brains and faith from those in charge of doing the theoretical revolution. I just showed them the right directions in the compass because we are way far from where we were heading 50 years ago...


one last note: You mentioned 65 in your references... it was 65 the total number of decimals in the Square Root of 2 in 2010 from where I discovered 137.

Could this just be the product of a coincidence or where in fact ancient Jewish prophets capable of predicting such discovery well ahead of their own time?

I'm open to those thoughts too... God works in mysterious ways and I have learned that lesson a long time ago.

Thank you again!

[Profpat]

I found this intersesting post on the internet regarding the number 137.

Wolfgang Pauli knew through his mandelas and the collective unconscious parameters of Carl Jung that the fine-structure constant ( 1/137.035999701 ) , a primal number , has a connectiveness to the primal numbers of man. This connectiveness number is the integer...37:

Leahy dream number ....2808:
( 10 ^ (( 2807.9999879 / 37 ) - 72 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Van Halen's number ...5150:
( 10 ^ (( 5149.99999881 / 3.7 ) - 1388 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Hindu number....108:
( 10 ^ ( 107.999999879 / .37 ) - 288 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Druid , John of Patmos number ...144:
( 10 ^ ( 143.999987919 / 37 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

John of Patmos numbers ...1260 and 666:
( 10 ^ (( 1259.99978254 / 666 ) + 2 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Leahy's triple logic number ...82944:
( 10 ^ ( 82943.9930413 / 32 / 666 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Plato's number of the world soul...2592:
( 10 ^ ( 2591.99978254 / 666 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Dengler's name change number ...1069:
( 10 ^ (( 1068.99998792 / 37 ) - 25 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Mayan/Aztec number ...2304:
( 10 ^ (( 2303.99978254 + 288 ) /666 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Harlston's Hunab number ( Aztec) ...378
378 + 288 = 666

R.Tomes master harmionic number ...3456:
( 10 ^ (( 3455.999789 / 666 ) - 46 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701


J.Iuliano

[humanbydefault]

My fiend Profpat you said something really interesting other members in this forum should be aware of.

The problem is that after the natural course of life took control of their destiny and after one by one of those remarkable scientists who showed us the way into a new technological revolution (Feynman, Einstein, Pauli etc) died of different causes those signs have been replaced by mathematical formalisms pointing to a theory claiming eleven dimensions and uncertainty all over the universe... I don't want to reign on you parade but those times are now gone forever.

Even Einstein may have been convinced about the possibility that Quantum Mechanics may have even been right after all. He failed to prove it after E.P.R. and Bell was unsuccesful in backing up Einstein on that one too.

The only common denominator in all this sad equation is the true interpretation of the objective Reality. It is and has always been IT what Physics should be after and not following oracles from what abstract numerical formulations may have been missleadingly saying to them.

As for what you mentioned about the connection Pi constant- Alpha, I proved with my numerical analysis and it is all over the internet and here in this site in one of my Blogs that both are indeed related in one particular way.

That way is the reference! The number 1 (one) is the universal reference and there are millions of evidence to support this claim. Just take a close look at the "Z" of the elements in the Periodic Table. Elements (atoms of different types) are separated by their relationship with the unit one. One have 1, 2 or three protons more than the next in the nucleus and that relates one with the other within the Table. I believe that numbers (since they are also refer to one) as each number increases in an exact unit from the previous one, are a genuine representation of Reality and those numbers have spoken (literally speaking) in every single operation I have done with them.

Those symmetries -I have written and posted here along with the continuos popping out of what I jokingly named "The three amigos" [825] and [174] are the "mirror value" of that inherent perturbation observed in atomic orbitals.

Of course I don't expect all of you to take a look at my work I don't think anyone has the right to do such thing here but if you haven't understand what I have said with words like perturbation and cycles of seven so many times then I believe you should page back a little bit and read what I have said in the past. This is not for you personally, my friend, it is a recordatory to those planning on posting a criticism against my numbers. That's all.

Just study first before posting a criticism that will put you in a very ackward position in front of the others. It has been (I could say unfortunately too) the opposite for a few members in the past with regards to others. It hasn't happen to me yet but I've seen it many times among others and that is highly regretable to say the least.

I have followed that advise for as long as I can remember and it works. I cannot give you a decent opinion of your theory unless I read and study it. Otherwise let it be!

Thanks!

[humanbydefault]

Yes the numbers 1, 3, and 7 have always had religious significance.

The ONE God of the Hebrews

The THREE Divine Persons of God of the Christians (The Trinity)

The SEVEN;
The Number 7 has for ages been regarded as the Number of mystery relating to the spiritual side of things. It may be remarked that all through the Bible and other sacred books, the seven, whenever mentioned, always stands in relation to the spiritual or mysterious God force, and has a curious significance in this sense whenever employed.



For a few instances of this, take the seven days (or cycles) of the creation as referred to in Genesis:

• The seven heavens, so often referred to.

• 
  The seven thrones.
  ETC.

It is true!

The seven sins, the seven seas and the seven wonders of the World!

It seems that seven has tirelessly trying to say something important and we keep our eyes closed from realizing what Reality is trying to convey to us...

Interesting indeed.

[humanbydefault]

I found this intersesting post on the internet regarding the number 137.

Wolfgang Pauli knew through his mandelas and the collective unconscious parameters of Carl Jung that the fine-structure constant ( 1/137.035999701 ) , a primal number , has a connectiveness to the primal numbers of man. This connectiveness number is the integer...37:

Leahy dream number ....2808:
( 10 ^ (( 2807.9999879 / 37 ) - 72 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Van Halen's number ...5150:
( 10 ^ (( 5149.99999881 / 3.7 ) - 1388 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Hindu number....108:
( 10 ^ ( 107.999999879 / .37 ) - 288 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Druid , John of Patmos number ...144:
( 10 ^ ( 143.999987919 / 37 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

John of Patmos numbers ...1260 and 666:
( 10 ^ (( 1259.99978254 / 666 ) + 2 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Leahy's triple logic number ...82944:
( 10 ^ ( 82943.9930413 / 32 / 666 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Plato's number of the world soul...2592:
( 10 ^ ( 2591.99978254 / 666 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Dengler's name change number ...1069:
( 10 ^ (( 1068.99998792 / 37 ) - 25 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Mayan/Aztec number ...2304:
( 10 ^ (( 2303.99978254 + 288 ) /666 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Harlston's Hunab number ( Aztec) ...378
378 + 288 = 666

R.Tomes master harmionic number ...3456:
( 10 ^ (( 3455.999789 / 666 ) - 46 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701


J.Iuliano

Isn't it great!!! I didn't know that!

Did you see the calculation of 37 within the Square Root of 2 I have published here not long ago?

The numbers left after every other number was cancelled out were:

8 + 14 + 15 = 37! Also 137 - 100 = 37! Taking number ten (10) as a completion of one cycle (According to the "Mayas") after ten cycles of ten elapsed completely you end up with the remanining: 37!

Even 37 = [3 + 7] = 10! So in a sense is also a message itself!

I want you to see this:

37 is made up from 3 which is already in its 'object configuration' [according to my numerical system of interpreting the numbers] and 7 is in its 'image configuration' which means that 2 is its 'object'.

I have proved and said that every time you convert a number an ODD number of times, you must change the sign of the result.

So if we take 37 and convert it into 32 it will be -32!

We know that -32 = 1/32 = 0.03125! [3 + 1 + 2 + 5] = 11! and converting (5) into (0) we obtain [3 + 1 + 2] = 6!

Both numbers 11 and 6 add up 17! I have "mirror valued" the Plank's constant (the regular one and the reduced version of it) and the result has always been 17!

If you scrool back in this very post you'll see 6 and 11 also as the "mirror values" of 137 and that I have obtained from multiplying (.035) and (999) by themselves the same number of times [6 and 11] and reached 11 and 10 which finally end up in the sum = 21!


21 is MIKAL's 73! Go back to the table and see it yourselves. Besides why is 73 also relevant? Well symmetry! Watch:

37 >< 73 See it? If 21 is the sum (a net product) of the numbers left out from cancelling all the others in 65 fraction-long figure inside the Square Root of 2...

It means that whatever was left (37), was perfectly symmetrical with the number (21) representd in its prime by 73.


In other words... I see 37 as the true message within Alpha after all cycles were properly cancelled out.


Thanks for your terrific comments!

[Mikal]

Thank you for your comment. I appreciate your thanks to the posting too.

This is what Dr. Ricahrd Feynman said about Alpha that I want you to read:

"... You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!"

What it was said in that quote seems pretty straighforward to me, although it seems not as quite clear for some members here"

He stated back then that we can measure Alpha experimentally... there is no doubts about that issue... Today here are many methods to do such thing: Satellite measurements, and other experimental ways including an attempt made by Dr. Gilson (England) to calculate it empirically by employing 'Prime numbers' by the way.

What is not clear (ever since) is the subject of where it is coming from and whether could there be a Physical Model to represent its origin in the first place.

That is what I have proposed in the Square Root of 2 Model of Reality.

Two issues here! One experimentally which is done earlier in the XXth century and refined somewhat later on and the issue of its origins and empirical representation inside a model of Reality.

Non of that has been proposed by current theories so far. Take music and the nature of colors (Goethe's theory of colours). As for today it is not considered even a Physical theory due to our IGNORANCE in the understanding of Reality. Heisenberg gave his personal opinion about it saying that Newton was the fortunate one who got closer to the Physical truth. I believe it was Heisenberg who was not able to understand how far Goethe was capable of going by actually realizing the relativistic effects of Reality inside a beam of light.

It was a remarkable achievement and so far no one has been close to understand him and this is the year 2010! It is a shame!

As for the numbers that you mentioned earlier in you kind posting is true! Those numbers are key to understand the origin of Alpha and its connection with our Reality.

Those number were at some point posted by me before and I notes that you picked up as quickly as no one. 137 is indeed that representaion of the symmetrical side of the constant.

When I said that I regreat not having a scientific calculator I meant it. I am absolutely sure (convinced) that if someone could make the multiplication of .035 and 999 by themselves as many as 137 times, he or she would be amazed of the results. I bet they will find those lucky trios many many times embedded in the result and the "mirror value" of 14 and 17 all over.

This is just the beginnings of a long Proof... It will take more brains and faith from those in charge of doing the theoretical revolution. I just showed them the right directions in the compass because we are way far from where we were heading 50 years ago...


one last note: You mentioned 65 in your references... it was 65 the total number of decimals in the Square Root of 2 in 2010 from where I discovered 137.

Could this just be the product of a coincidence or where in fact ancient Jewish prophets capable of predicting such discovery well ahead of their own time?

I'm open to those thoughts too... God works in mysterious ways and I have learned that lesson a long time ago.

Thank you again!

The importance of the number 137 is that it is related to the so-called 'fine-structure constant' of quantum electrodynamics. This derived quantity is given by combining several fundamental constants of nature:



where e is the charge on the electron, c is the speed of light, h-bar is Planck's constant and the epsilon represents the permittivity of free space. Despite the fact that each of these constants has their own dimensions, the fine-structure constant is completely dimensionless!

Brent Nelson, M.A. Physics, Ph.D. Student, UC Berkeley

Do you see this as correct Sir?? If the fine-structure constant is completely dimensionless then could we see this number as representing the Universal pattern of primal creation?? Do you see it possible that the number 1 represents ‘fusion’??



136 means sound or wave 136 is the word "voice" (Quf - Vav - Lamed).
137 is creation or to mediate to reconcile all creation! "

138 means little atom or material also particle or piece of matter (Chelek (Cheit - Lamed - Quf),

To figure all this out one has to work between the kabbalah and the Hebrew Alphabet.


...1033 is a collective unconscious integer:


1033 / 37 = 2791.891891891...


....such that fine-structure is expressed as:


(10 ^ ((1032.9999998745 / .37) - 278) / 666 = sqrd 137.035999701

I find all this interesting because Carl Jung felt 137 was the Archetype for the Collective Unconscious.


Regards Mikal

[Mikal]

Just a note....I did not put that funny little face in there as the eight but it does come up on its own many times....smiles....

Regards Mikal

[humanbydefault]

Just a note....I did not put that funny little face in there as the eight but it does come up on its own many times....smiles....

Regards Mikal

Funny isn't it? I happened to me a few times before too. I know already the trick that every time you write an 8 within parenthesis you get the little fellow too. I kind of got used to it already...

What you posted earlier in regards to the dimensionless constant Alpha was a fact 100%.

Mikal since I decided to develope this new "Numerological System" to deal with numbers according to a common REFERENCE and began "mirroring" classical and important constants (both mathematical and physical as well) I have found nothing but amazing results...

You mentioned one that I already mirrored and that is the electric charge of the electron. It was 14 according to my calculations. Both Plank's constant gave me 17 although we know that the difference in their exponential is also seven! [one is ten with -34 for exponential and the reduced one -27 wich difer each other by 7]

When I decided to put all those numbers to the test and substitute each constant by their 'mirror values" it resulted in the following:

Alpha = 14 x 14 [being the square of the product of "e"] divided by the reduced Plank's constant (17) times (3) since "c" was equal to 3.

It gave me 196/51!

Since 17 x 3 = 51 and 14 x 14 = 196.

The result was amazing!

It was 3. 843 137... I want to show you what I have already demonstrated with examples of Alpha precisely (.035 and 999) but this time using the values of my mirror analysis:

multiplying 843 x 843 (three times as implied by number 3 to the left of the decimal point) we obtain 50500758.

The two zeros mean twice 7s which gives us the following result:

[10] [458] converting 8 into 3 and 4 into 9... [359]! We know that Alpha = 137. 0359...

Then I took 137 that was the second group of number obtained from 196/51...

mutiplied 137 three times I obtained 352268! = 35 [4] [4] after adding up (4 + 4) and converting 6 into 1 and 8 into 3. Converting the last two 4s into their own images we obtain 03599 which corresponds to the correct digits.

Again I obtained the same results using both "wings" of the same fraction (which is not a "new discovery" at all since I have proven this feature not long ago here).

This means that the results of my mirror analysis are as legitimate as the classical ones used but with a fundamental difference: REFERENCE!

I refer each and every constant to the unit (1) while Physicists and mathematicians refer their numbers to predetermined "physical units" based on a rather burocratical sets of units. (meters or inches or joules or ergs).

I see the advantages of using both since in some cases (using irrational numbers for example like in greedy expansions) mirror values provides a simplified method to double check the results in a faster and relieable fashion.


HBD

[humanbydefault]

The following was quoted from a recent posting of mine:


This is a good one!

If we divide 100/37 = 2. 702 702 7... Which means as you now know 702 twice.

702 x 702 = 492804 = (4 + 4 + 2 + 3 + 0 + 4) = 17! The same mirror value obtained for Plank's constant!

Then let's divide the number represented by 37 in its prime configuration (12):

100/12 = 8.3333333... Multiplying 3 by itself eight times: 19683!

Let's see what it means:

(1 + 4 + 6 + 3 + 3) = 17! The same thing! The same result!


What you see is a result of 17 using 12 as a prime for 37 and in both cases I obtained the same results.


I did it again but this time I went on the "quest" using a different 'route'...


I took the numbers that cancelled out in the square root of 2 [two 12s, four 10s and four 9s] and I looked for their corresponding primes.


I found 89, 151 and 173 as their prime numbers and I simply added up all of them: 413.

You probably recall that the numbers that cancelled out added up 100. That's why we obtained 37 as the one left behind all that cancellations, right?

So! If 413 is the "prime" equivalent to 24 + 40 + 36 (the total of 100 cancelled out) I decided to divide 100/413

100/413 = 0.242 1307! So... we obtained 137 right there and 242.

When I looked for the 242th prime number I found that it was 1531!

1531 = [1 + 5 + 3 + 1] = 10!

Which means no change in the original result of 137!

This is another empirical evidence that 137 itself represents symmetry on base seven (7). Since we already know (via the numerical proof connecting primes with regular numbers) that their hidden relationship is based on seven (7) this result confirmed that 137 from the prime-reference is a complete cycle of ten.

[MJA]

"Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)


For me all is truly One.

=
MJA