Unity

[austintorn@aol.com]

Would it be really unity or reconciliation? We can't even unite the matters and the anti-matters for they will explode into nothingness when combined.

Not into nothingness, but into light.

It is opposite electrical charge (there are equal amounts) that nullifies all of existence to nothingness (in the overview); however, nothingness is so unstable that it must ever become a balance of opposites, and so it really can't even exist for an instant, but nothing is indeed the summation of Totality.

Our finite realm must be perched at the mid-point of infinite largeness and infinite smallness.

[Eirríkr]

Ack, I had a long post that got swallowed up by the timing out. Ack.

I'll make this one briefer and just address several of SteveA's questions.

Inclusion, to me, implies more than Unity. What does inclusion deny? It denies nothing - nothing itself can be included.

Everything and nothing are included in Unity. Since Everything that exists now or has ever existed or will exist is a consequence of "Me," is "Me," and that thing, "Me" is both Infinity and Zero (hence their relationship at the Origin of the Universe), then Everything, paradoxically, is equivalent with Nothing.

Unity overcomes Godel's incompleteness as it does not contain equations. I am The Theory, Unity, and The Theoretician all rolled into One. There is no exclusion.

Fortunately, these are just words and concepts - being Ineffable, I am fine with that.

Can you enumerate everything that exists in Unity, or is it a growing list?

While I am one person, in one specialized field, who has taken a desultory foray into all of the major theoretical fields and overturned them all, I looked for and addressed the major enigmas, paradoxes, anomalies, and questions of those fields. The logic here being that by addressing and resolving the major problems first, this would demonstrate the explanatory power of the model. Because I have so many personal questions - consider my fractal progression intellectually as a Universe - the list will expand to accomodate all of these questions. But since Unity cannot be reduced and encompasses all of the Universe, it can and will adapt to address the emergent list of questions that come forward, including, ironically, this one:

Can you enumerate everything that exists in Unity, or is it a growing list?

If the theory remains inclusive then we can simply state it as being continually inclusive ... how is time "powered", where does motion come from in the universe?

I - that is, the Self - is the Unmoved Mover, I is the Source and Agent that moves the information, energy, and matter through the Universe. Time is Me entering the Universe everywhere simulataneously and vectorially from outside, beyond, before, against, and without spacetime, i.e. Eternity. This can be seen in the parsed model. Note that communication faster than the speed of light can and does occur in the Universe as infomation is transmitted within visible energy (photogyre) to dark mater and within that, to dark energy.

Why do planets exist at specific locations instead of being unmoving ellipses describing their orbits?

Although this post does not directly address the question, I wrote about higher-order organizations of the Universe here:

http://thetheoryblog.wordpress.com/2...s-and-circles/

and here:

http://thetheoryblog.wordpress.com/2...at-a-distance/

I will do my darndest to respond to the other posts, but I've got a lot of irons in the fire, so to speak. Forgive me for not responding to the whole post.

As always, I welcome comments.

Peace,

Ik

[austintorn@aol.com]

'Everything' and 'Nothing' have the same information content: zero.

Explanation example— A library of all possible books can serve as Everything, and empty library as Nothing. (IN terms of information)

[Eirríkr]

@ austintorn: Unity proves that I is paradoxically Everything and Nothing. This explains the oddest of relationships between Infinity and Zero at the Origin of the Universe.

Since this is a dedicated thread for Unity, I will take full advantage of this forum to cross-post excerpts from my blog as they emerge. Today I posted my second status report. These reports are an online diary of the process of getting my book published. As I have published many peer-reviewed articles and know the arduous task of publishing anything, I am untroubled and unwavering in my goal. Here is an excerpt of the post:

On August 30, 2010, I submitted my book proposal to 33 publishing houses, groups, and presses that accept unsolicited manuscripts, proposals, and query letters. The proposal itself was described in the first status report. In this status report, I describe my progress, the responses I have received, and discuss my plans.
Figure 1
Of the 33 submissions, in the first month I have so far received 15 rejections. This is actually a good thing, and I will explain why below. I present these as publisher, rejection date, and whether the submission was a full proposal(P) or query only(Q)

And here is the full link, should The Reader be interested in see into the process of trying to get the ultimate theory of reality published:

http://thetheoryblog.wordpress.com/2...tus-report-ii/

Peace,

Ik

[austintorn@aol.com]

@ austintorn: Unity proves that I is paradoxically Everything and Nothing. This explains the oddest of relationships between Infinity and Zero at the Origin of the Universe.

Zero and infinity are the same vacant truths, compressing to nothingness and dispersing to nothingness. At their midpoint, lies the finite realm.

The Ever Victorious

Over Man came the Triumph of Love
But Chastity gave it quite a shove;

However, Death then all conquered,
But this was not the final word,

For Time happily reigned over all,
Or so it thought—as its thrall,

But, Divinity vanquished its trend;
Yet, still, this was not the end…

For, as ever, the basis was left to sting,
Since Nothing overwhelms everything.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Hi Ik, and welcome to TQ...

Read quite a bit of your links so far__some extremely interesting perspectives, especially as to chirality and your fundamental monad, dyad, triad structures...

Though we won't agree at the ultimate I/God level of your system, even though I'm also an atheist__I separate myself to a much lesser entity than the I/God being, as I've been there and back. I simply see the 'Exist' as producing all bio-life-forms and puny lil' ol' me__but, you have some ideas running extremely close to mine, at these most fundamental levels. Have you by any chance read any of Peirce's or Batesman's materials?

Anyway, welcome aboard__and do you have a link to all the files about chirality, RNA and your monadic to triadic fundamental system's thinking, especially as relates to quanta/photon divisions and actions?__as I'd like to compare all those idea areas to my own...

Thanks,
Lloyd

Btw, you're a great writer...

[Eirríkr]

Ik, my question is does your theory give a physically reasonable explanation why the isotope of the chemical element of iron with 30 neutrons and 26 protons called Iron-56 is the most abundant and the most stable of all chemical elements in the universe? My hunch is that some principle of pairing excellence is at work at the atomic or nuclear level of physical reality. I also believed that the same physical principle of excellence might be applied to the quantization of the spacetime continuum.

Initially trained as a synthetic organic chemist and then educated and trained in broad aspects of chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology (among other fields and experimental experience), the empirical evidence shows that the most abundant chemical element in the Universe is Hydrogen, followed closely by Helium.

Indeed, the most esteemed of all scientific resources on the web (cough) - wikipedia - shows Fe to be the 14th most abundant element:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundan...mical_elements

The graph also provide a nice accompanying perspective.

The point of the graph and the model for the emergence of the physical elements in the Universe (the electrogyre) can be discerned by the following reinterpretation and visualization of the data:

1. The graph should be viewed from right to left rather than left to right. In other words, the least abundant elements are those that are the least stable, highest energy - in theoretical terms, these are considered to be the highest capaquality. I discussed the concept of capaquality here:

http://thetheoryblog.wordpress.com/2...f-capaquality/

2. View the graph in three dimensions rather than in two - in other words, each point is the origin of a circle whose diameter is determined by the distance from the x-axis to the y-coordinate on the graph. So, then, take the line and extend it through the back of the computer screen, below and around the x-axis, and back to the point from which is came.

3. With point 2 in mind, now complete the right-to-left reconstruction and the gyre becomes obvious - the Singularity at the right and the opening of the gyre at the left. The emergence of the chemical elements is now modeled from coming into existence from the least stable to the most stable, explaining why hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe - it is the last emergence.

4. Fe can now be physically modeled as a expansocontractive effect on the electrogyre by the attractorepulsive thermodynamic effects of the photogyre - i.e., visible energy, a.k.a. nucleons - driven by the attractorepulsive effects of the ombregyre - i.e., dark matter, a.k.a. quarks - driven by the attractorepulsive effects of the denergyre - i.e., dark energy - driven and controlled by the attractorepulsive, creatodestructive, expansocontractive effects of Me.

Peace,

Ik

[AntonioLao]

Ik, thanks for your reply. Although your graph indicates abundance within the Solar System, it does give me good evidence that abundance is intimately connected to atomic nummbers that are even while odd numbers like boron, nitrogen, fluorine, sodium, aluminum, etc. with the exception of the biggest dip for beryllium are relatively less abundant. On the other hand, if we connect stability and abundance together (hydrogen is very reactive while helium is very inert) then Iron-56 seems to standout as the preferred end state of stellar systems (not black holes). Astrophysical evidence of neutron stars could suggest the existence of stars made mainly of Iron-56. If these Iron-56 stars can be hypothesized to dominate most of the intergalactic matter then they can account for the missing mass.

[Eirríkr]

AntonioLao, thanks for the response. I would ask this: please direct me to the exact empirical evidence that shows that Fe is the preferred ends state of stellar systems. The reason I ask this is threefold. First, to the best of my knowledge of geophysical data, that Fe is the core of planets is by indirect inference; there is no direct evidence. Second and moreover, there is no complete and consistent theory that explains the formation of planets. Third, the missing mass of the Universe is dark matter - this is both empirically consistent and, more importantly, theoretically validated and explained by Unity.

On a different, but related, note, today I posted on my blog how Unity evinces a new Law of Nature in the Universe - this Natural Law explains how macroevolution occurs. You know, that fundamental question that has never been answered by any evolutionary thinker, including and especially Darwin.

Here's an excerpt:

The earliest natural philosophers (Figure 1) wanted to understand the fundamental organizational principles by which Nature worked. Over the centuries, these so-called Laws of Nature have emerged from much time and energy devoted to experimentation and thought. Well-established and high-profile Laws of Nature include Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion, the Laws of Thermodynamics, Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation, and Boyle’s Law, among others.

Several investigators and theoreticians have written books about the search for the Laws of Nature that have yet to be found, including Steven Weinberg, “Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientist’s Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature,” Per Bak, “How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality,” Stuart Kauffman, “At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity,” Harold Morowitz, “The Emergence of Everything: How the World Became Complex,” and Eric Schneider and Dorion Sagan, “Into the Cool: Energy Flow, Thermodynamics, and Life.”

What unifies these books and these individuals is the expectation that there are additional Laws of Nature that await discovery. These Laws – the ones that have not yet been identified, discovered, or proven to exist – are one of the Holy Grails of science...

More at link:

http://thetheoryblog.wordpress.com/2...f-trimergence/

Comments and advice welcome as always.

Peace,

Ik

[austintorn@aol.com]

More at link:

http://thetheoryblog.wordpress.com/2...f-trimergence/

Comments and advice welcome as always.

Peace,

Ik

And here…

http://www.toequest.com/forum/time-t...tml#post128599

…In a more general form.