Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AntonioLao when the values of the mass becomes greater and greater the particles associated with them become harder and harder to detect hence their probabilities becomes nearer and nearer to zeros. But greater masses can surely be more probable in the past not in the future yet the smallest fermions such as the protons do not decay or die. They seem to live forever after they were formed in the early universe. |
Heim's mass formula is the greatest success of his theory - and as you opened the thread with a link from DESY in Hamburg - note that in 1982 Heim, with the assistance of DESY scientists, programmed his mass formula on the DESY computers and all were amazed when the values came out as very accurate. The strange thing is, the experimentailsts who worked with Heim on that wanted confirmation of the equations from more theorists, but at that time no other theorists knew of the formula. Funny, as the results should be proof enough. Also, they complained of lack of lifetime estimates - 20 years later Heim had those too and so could narrow down the mass spectrum of excited states to the resonances actually observed in accelerators - which is what the DESY people had wanted. But of course when he produced it he was close to death and the DESY people were no longer as active as in 1982. C'est la vie.
Heim needs no Higgs mechanism as the masses arise by internal metron interactions of the particles.
http://heim-theory.com/Contents/Intr...s_mass-fo.html http://www.heim-theory.com/downloads...ed_Results.pdf
Oh and your idea about greater energy implying greater probabililty reminds again of Haisch et al.'s idea of some particles (muons, pions?) being variations of the basic electron, where the charge gets smeared out in such a way as to give more mass by interacting with the vacuum polarisation...
Linear Mode
