An acronym for a dream, TOE

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

I do not conclude that a working model of infinite requires a commitment to a no beginning. Why not an infinity from nothing as opposed to a little bit from nothing?

Good statement. IMHO, an infinity from nothing that does not require a a commitment to a no beginning is a plausible proposition for a TOE of physics. A state of no beginning could well be a phenomenon of localized perception in the worldview of 3 spatial demensions, as could be abstractly understood with the concept of hypersphere that has a beginning to its state of infinity in all direction.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Our TOE requires only three dimensions. All the "fundamental" particles and the 4 forces of physics derive from the phase locked structure composed of only one fundamental substance. Time is a natural and straight forward consequence of this structure as mass is also.

TY for the clarification, I believe you have a good head start with the neoclassical approach as the foundation of your TOE. In this sense, I am curious to know what is your view on gravitational time dilation; did you think that time slows in higher gravitational potential is incorrect?

Please elaborate on the phase locked structure composed of only one fundamental substance, and how does all the "fundamental" particles and the 4 forces of physics derive from it.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Yes. We understand the pressure or energy associated with the structure of the Universe. With this in mind one might expect that the elements of the Universe would repel or push back against their neighbors.

IMHO, pressurized repelling reaction of elemental components could comprehensively explain the mass effect of matter (aka gravity), and coherently unifies the 4 forces for how these could come about from the harmonics of the pressurized repelling elemental components in perpetual motion. I subscribe to the concept that the attraction phenomenon of gravity is caused by the repelling reaction of pressurized elemental components.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

In a single word, no. Not until we are clear what the required character is of the fundamental stuff. And it is not clarifying to dwell on the origin of the fundamental components. And even the reason for choosing to work with negative charged components of one third the value of the charge of an electron is best left until we recognize how energy and the structure of the universe produce the elemental particles with their mass; and until we see how the structure of the universe transports energy.

I now understood your TOE was develop from this posit.

IMHO, UVS could pry into the causality for the elemental components of your TOE; quantized elemental components are particulated in the vortical motion of a colossal monopole system. And in vortical interaction of two colossal monopole systems the elemental components would reconnect to form a nested toroidal structure with dipole moment. The nested toroidal structure with dipole moment in perpetual vortical motion could comprehensively explain how energy and this structure of the universe in vortical motion of elemental components could produce the elemental particles with the mass, and how this structure of the universe in perpetual motion transports energy in a unisonal clockwork mechanism of resonated harmonics by exchanging angular momentum among the discrete elemental particles in vortical spin fusion. In the grand perpetual vortical motion of the nested toroidal structure these matters driven in unisonal motion are then vortically coalesced as superclusters, galaxy clusters, galaxies, satellite galaxies, star systems with their satellites and sub-satellites as empirically observed. This is merely a UVS worldview in a qualitative form, if you are interested for an observational evidence, see a UVS topic on “The dipole anisotropy pattern of CMBR”.

[Ava202]

...........hypersphere............

Now why get all hyper on me when we can explain and calculate every thing that we observe in only three dimensions?

[Ava202]

...........perpetual vortical motion .............

When I was about 10 years old I spent many hours over several weeks trying to build a perpetual motion device; I did not succeed in my endeavor but I did learn a lot in the process. My God, I hope that I am not conversing with a one eyed animatron.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Now why get all hyper on me when we can explain and calculate every thing that we observe in only three dimensions?

Why? You invited conversation in “Your TOE Theory” section and asked questions such as the square one of others, and posit a state of infinity for your TOE without elaboration, and emphasised your TOE of physics is about truths.

I shall ask a question or suggest a topic of discussion and then post the distillates from your responses and other inputs on my ToeQuest blog. Be brief were possible and keep in mind we shall seek not consensus but look for insight.

As a conversational platform for exchanging of ideas, hypersphere is merely one of the possible explanations for the state of infinity in the 3D physical reality; there could be other plausible explanations from another insight. I am always curious about any state of infinity, especially from someone who adopts it for his TOE and therefore might offer some insight. It now unfolds to me that you are not concerned about this fundamental posit of yours or you are looking for any insight for this at all, I therefore would not discuss this further.

I do believe that I am being led in the direction of truth.

I hope you are not passing mathematically validated quantitative predictions as proofs for your claims of truth; such mathematical claim could only be valid or invalid in its hypothetical world view that are based on its assumption, and cannot be stated as it is a truth or not a truth with reference to reality.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

When I was about 10 years old I spent many hours over several weeks trying to build a perpetual motion device; I did not succeed in my endeavor but I did learn a lot in the process. My God, I hope that I am not conversing with a one eyed animatron.

Are you not aware of the infinite vorticity of superfluid? After a motion is induced and thus forms a vortex in superfluid, the vortex would not stop by itself; perpetual vortical motion. This is not a hypothetical object or its phenomenon was unreal, and as a matter of fact, superfluid was used in a precise gyroscopic measuring instrument in the Gravity Probe B project. Zero viscosity of superfluid implies the vorticity of a quantized vortex is infinite; conceptually, a spheroidal quantized vortex has the repulsion characteristic of monopole.

Although perpetual vortical motion of quantized vortices was also observed in Bose-Einstein condensate, it was simply brushed aside as a novelty state of matter, which the universal laws of thermodynamics do not apply. If the equation for a law of physics cannot explain a reality, it is not the reality was incorrect.

[Ava202]

Why? You invited conversation in “Your TOE Theory” section and asked questions ........ and posit a state of infinity for your TOE without elaboration, and emphasised your TOE of physics is about truths.

As a conversational platform for exchanging of ideas, hypersphere is merely one of the possible explanations for the state of infinity in the 3D physical reality; there could be other plausible explanations from another insight. I am always curious about any state of infinity, especially from someone who adopts it for his TOE and therefore might offer some insight. It now unfolds to me that you are not concerned about this fundamental posit of yours or you are looking for any insight for this at all, I therefore would not discuss this further. ...........

You are right. I did invite collaboration and that must surely include questions and comments. My time is limited on this forum and I am often unorganized even with an adequate allotment of time. The concept of infinity is of interest but our initial concern is with getting interested individuals up to speed with an understanding of the structure of the universe and how the reality of particles and mass and time result from that simple structure.

[Ava202]

http://www.learner.org/courses/physics/video/vid_byunit.html?unit=8

Our TOE has inspiration from the structure of the Universe. We do not have Total agreement on how old the Universe is or on how large it is.

But we do agree that how the basic ingredient of the Universe packs is key to understanding both the Physics and Cosmology of our reality.

A site recommended by Lloyd Gillespie has a section dealing with Emergent Behavior in Quantum matter; check it out.