Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    unitarity of the S-matrix

    as an operator, the S-matrix is unitary giving the commutative matrix products of its conjugate transpose.

    [math]\mathbf{S}^{\dagger}\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{S}\mathbf{S }^{\dagger}=1[/math]

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    as an operator, the S-matrix is unitary giving the commutative matrix products of its conjugate transpose.

    [math]\mathbf{S}^{\dagger}\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{S}\mathbf{S }^{\dagger}=1[/math]
    What does the christ cross-like near the Ss stand for?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What does the christ cross-like near the Ss stand for?
    it stands for the conjugate transpose of the scattering matrix.

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    What are the elements of the S matrix?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    complex numbers

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What are the elements of the S matrix?
    They might be complex numbers or operators representing physically observables such as momentum and energy.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    They might be complex numbers or operators representing physically observables such as momentum and energy.
    does it have a determined m-by-n size?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    does it have a determined m-by-n size?
    They are more like m by m or n by n, that are square matrices.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    They are more like m by m or n by n, that are square matrices.
    But the numbers are not fix, like, it's not neccesarilly 2x2. It can be 2x2, 3x3, 4x4, 5x5.....right?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    you are right

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    It can be 2x2, 3x3, 4x4, 5x5.....right?
    However, the size is depended upon the number of scattered particles in the interactions.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    However, the size is depended upon the number of scattered particles in the interactions.
    What about the present particles not involved in the interactions?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The philosophy and Attributes of ETHER
    By dleviwing in forum General Phenomena
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 05-04-2010, 03:59 PM
  2. LaTeX support is back!
    By Robert in forum News and Announcements
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-11-2006, 02:09 PM
  3. graviton vs. photon
    By AntonioLao in forum Forces of Nature
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-29-2005, 01:52 PM
  4. algebraic structures
    By AntonioLao in forum Branches of Mathematics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-25-2005, 12:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top