Nature Physic. Information.

[Drifter]

From the Cloaking Reality thread: "At the singularity, we abruptly transformed our heart to the right becoming our own image in the mirror."

"Exactly...........Relativity." Neck and neck!

[Drifter]

http://www.dvaita.org/faq.shtml

[picturepeculiar]

Here I am continuing to 3-dim the image by using geometric lines and by using the lines and curves of the butterfly as reference points. I am beginning to define the relationship of every point along the butterfly as related to ( mirror effect) all other points. As will be further explained.

A) I have placed 2 red circles(filled with color) as representing light and energy following "a path" toward a reflective surface.

B) You will notice that on the "ends" of the butterflies wings ...part of the wings are inside a large red circle.( these parts includes the "eyes on the wings" as well as part of the geometry of the wings accompanied by the "strange" black and white shapes.

You will notice that the red circles ( A) is attached to the larger red circle(B) by red lines.

C) The reflective surface is represented by the rectangle(blue) that closes in the butterfly's head,eyes, part of the body and wings. I have inverted this portion of the butterflies head and body so as to illustrate my points. The rectangle box (representing a reflective plane)is colored in with the color "gray"('matter'...?).

As well I have taken part of the 'costas(wings)' and utilized them(perspectively left and right) to describe a "path" that goes from the point of light (A) to the reflective plane surface(C). This "path"(A-C) represents the "incidence angle" from the point of light(A) to the surface of the reflective plane(C).

Note: I have illustrated the "path of light ray" by the portion of the 'gray costa' that runs from the center of "A" to the plane surface of "C." I have illustrated this by drawing a small red circle on the end of the "costa" , on the reflective plane.

This illustrates that A-C=B

Or: 'B' occurs because of 'A' relativity to 'C'

Or: "A"(energy/light) colides with C( reflective plane) due to... "path of A-ray".... being communicated to "C."

Or: "A" rays.... are communicated to "C".... relative to a certain "incidence angle." Once "A" is communicated to "C" its light is subsequently refracted; this refraction results in the "emergent geometry" of "B."

Thus: When "B" emerges ..it is as a result of the relativity of A-C. (where "C" is expanded to include both surface reflection as well refraction of ..."A")

The energy, quality and sound of "A" is communicated to the reflective plane of "C"... then the quality, energy and sound of "A" is subsequently refracted. When energy is reflected/refracted relative to these processes this results in: "B"= "representation; emergent geometry.. of light."

These "representations ( "B" as so; inert.... of "A")" or "emergent geometries"( "B" of "A")........ result in the.......... image of "A"...............="B." (Where "B"= "mass"...of A-(energy)).

The quality, energy and sound of "A"... travels from point "A"... via the path and speed of light... until it reaches the reflective plane ( a plane with a certain quality and thickness that resuts in the refraction of light). Once it reaches the plane its light is refracted( bended, warped) this represents the "incicence angle" as deviating from course so as to refract to point "B."

Thus: In the illustration:

"A" moves at light speed( constant.) toward reflective a/the surface. A/The Reflective surface is either parallel to "A" rays or deviating from parallellism by perspective degrees. All of this relativity results in the shape and size of "B"(of "A") as communicated to ( recieved by) the reflective plane.

Thus in this illustration you will see that "A"( the red circles with part of the costas and the black dots with small white specks)...is the "same as" B( The lower right/left wings of the butterfly perspectively.)( B= The wings from "C" to the tip of the wings as representing an... "eye"). The small black dots.................. inside "A"............ equals the "eyse" on the wings of "B."
__________________________________________________ ____________________________

This is illustrating that 2(two) "points of light" are existing outside the plane(C). These two points of light are being received on the surface of of "C." They are being received at two different angles ..resulting in two different "angle of incidence" upon the plane surface. As both angles of incidence are then refracted this forms both the right lower wing and the left lower wing correspondingly. This would mean that in order for the wings to exist, as well as the relativity of the right wing to the left wing, their must be:

1) Energy(A)
2) reflective/refractive plane or aether(C)
3) the relativity of energy to reflective/refractive plane or aether.(A-C)

Notes:

1) The perceived motion of "B" is dictated by........................................ "A."(motion)
2) The speed of light is constant.......................................... ......186,000(A- speed..of light)
3) The motion of "C" is zero.............................................. ..........(C)=zero motion

And:

4) The motion of "B" is necessarily contingent upon.. and a reflection of... the motion of "A."
Thus: When "mass" moves it means that "B" is reflecting the motion of "A"..due to "A" relativity to "C."

5) If their are no perceived mass then "A" is NOT relative to "C." If there is no perceived motion of "B" then: "A"( potential motion) relative to "C"( zero motion) is in a 'state of rest."

This would dictate that:

"B" of necessity cannot or will not reflect the motion of "A" as "A" is not in a state of zero motion.

This would state that:

The "force acting upon"..."mass"("B")..... represents the motion of "A" relative to "C"..as reflecting/refracting the direction ,spin, revolution and motion of "B." ( this is dictated by either "A" in motion or "A" as moving toward or away from "C")

This would state that:

"mass" is a reflection of "A" and as such; "B" is a reflected FORM of "A". OR: "B" =A. Or: E=m...............Where C2 = A-C relativity. (And: Where "B"= (A-C relativity)=C2.) This would mean that the speed of light is only "squared" when "A" is relative to "C"( producing B="mass")...and such "squaring" is an illusion.
__________________________________________________ ____________________
Note: The "2 points of light" are being intelligently 'motivated' to remain relative to each other as well relative to a reflective plane with refractive properties. Or: Their is a third force that controls the relativity of A-C.
__________________________________________________ _____________________
Picture B...illustrates this more so.

[picturepeculiar]

These images continue to demonstrate the relationship(relativity) between energy and mass.

[picturepeculiar]

Nature Physic. Information: (cont.)(from post 1)...............................

Look at these two pictures.What do they look like?( Note: look at the images as they appear small as "attatched to" this post..then look at them when they are expanded by clicking on the box and observing the images as magnified.)

If picture 1 represents a certain volume of information then this would state that picture two is the same volume of information as viewed from a different relativity.

Yet! Both images though seemingly different are found "relative to" another seemingly entirely different information ...template.

What do you see? What principles are being expressed?

Note: The word "elephant" is representative of consonants and vowels as "relative to" the English language. The word "elephant" also represents.... phonetic(sound) information.

As it is language is that which allows humans the ability to transliterate light photon ( images) and sound( as a quality of the universe) to equivalent symbols and alphabetic character. This human system of interpreting information as seen and heard all around them is a very efficient means of attaching meaning to light images( recorded by the eye and interpreted by the brain) as well as sound( recorded by the auditory processes and subsequently interpreted by the brain.

Look at the word "elephant"..the last 5 letters are "phant."

If one pronounces the "ph" as the letter "p" ( where the "h" is silent...breath), and if one pronounces the letter "t" as "te"..then the experiment would scientifically state:......

.....If an "elephant" is viewed from a different relative view,( than we are accustomed to) and if the letters utilized in the formation of the word "elephant" are considered as to phonetic sound..then the experiment should demonstrate that an "elephant" bears the symmetric value of a "panda"( phant...e)...bear.

The linguistic experiment shows us that because the last 5 letters of the word "elephant" phonetically approximate the word "panda"..as such: The 'symmetric shape' of a panda should be found relative to the symmetry of an "elephant" ( if viewed from a different angle.)

Nature Physic. Information.

More experiments( myriad in application as well scientifically predictable and consistent)....will follow.
__________________________________________________ _________________________

Food for thought: Why does the word "elephant" read phonetically, perspectively: "a leaf picking hand".... "a leaf ant".... "eleva(n)te hand".... "a leap hand"....etc... ?
__________________________________________________ __________________________

-Are there scientific implications as it concerns "sound"....(sound information)... as transliterated to human language and awareness?
-Are their experiments that can be conducted that would lead to very relevant scientific conclusions as to the origin and purpose of ...language?
-Would such experiments show very definitive and distinct 'informations patterns' that can be applied toward human understanding of ...Nature Physic. Information?

Does an elephant have a "hand?" If so; how does the elephants hand relate to the human arm... relate to the panda ...relate to the "koala'...relate to: INFORMATION.. as disseminated throughout all of nature?

[picturepeculiar]

Consider these...questions. Questions worthy of experimentation relative to observation.

[picturepeculiar]

Relativity patterning.

The first image is a picture of "part" of the human anatomy.

Picture "A" shows this part of the human anatomy as "attached" to the body of an elephant.

Picture "B" shows this part of the human anatomy as "attached" to the body of an elephant and inverted as to color. You will see that the area of the human anatomy, when inverted forms the "eyes" and conture( proportionate symmetry) of the elephant.( wrinkles, tusks, and couture of elephants face and ear.)

Picture "C" shows both the human anatomy and the elephants body as inverted.

Picture "D" shows both the human anatomy as well as the elephants body without inverting color.

Principle postulate: Inversion of color begins to define relationships; both symmetric and informational... between these two "seemingly" opposing ..."things."

Pictures "E & F" demonstrate what occurs when one inverts the color of this part(E) of the human anatomy.(E & F)

Is this just coincidence? If NOT then what are the implications of this experiment? Will further experiments....( viewing the human anatomy and elephants head and trunk..from varying angles).... continue to elaborate on the relationships?

Things that are 'coincidental' should NOT prove verifiable relative to 10 out of 10 ..experiments.

We shall see.
__________________________________________________ ___________________________

Recall my former post with accompanying picture illustrations.

The picture ( "relative to" post # 66) continues to show both image and sound relationships between these "parts" of the human anatomy and the elephants head, trunk and ear.

In picture "A" ( picture posted in post #66) I have taken half an elephants head and copied it. I then flipped the image vertical..then 180 degree( 180 degree "about face"....we need to take in our scientific and mathematical approach...?)

You will see the "strong semblance" of the upper torso of the human anatomy. Look closely. You will see the symmetry of the human shoulders, triceps, biceps, pectoral muscles as well as the clavicle.

Remember: We are really "relatively observing" an elephants head as "relative to" the human anatomy( or the...reverse.)

Is this coincidental? If it...IS... 'coincidental'(chance?).... then the coincidence is proportional to the coincidence(s) that are "continually" described with the other images.

The other image(B) demonstrate these "relationships"("relativities") by inserting the "mirror effect... elephants heads" onto the human anatomy ( represented by the lower abdomen, obliques and the rest of the human arms).

***Of course the human arms are "relative to" the elephants trunk.

Image "C" continues to "focus our attention" on the distinct scientific and mathematical relationship(s).
__________________________________________________ _________________________
Is this all coincidence or does it bespeak intelligent design following a highly superior knowledge of intelligent...patterns?

If this ...IS...'coincidence'...then the coincidence(s) (Now "mounting" relative to observation and experiment) would be proportionate to the LINGUISTIC coincidences, that AS WELLl define the relationship further. How so?
__________________________________________________ ________________________
The science of language states:

That:

The word "elephant"... phonetically... approximates many different words and expressions. These words and expressions are not easily discerned when one just considers the word as a word with a corresponding meaning. Rather, their is a deeper volume of information being viwed..such information-meaning-association is discerned when one considers the value of Idiom-sound.

What am i here demonstrating?

That:

The word "elephant" approximates ( as to sound) the various words and expressions that I alluded to in post # 65, namely:

"Food for thought: Why does the word "elephant" read phonetically, perspectively: "a leaf picking hand".... "a leaf ant".... "eleva(n)te hand".... "a leap hand"....etc... ?"
And: "a left hand"...."a lift hand".....

Are we now seeing the relationship between the symmetry ( and information) relative to the elephants head and trunk and that of the human arm,shoulders, chest and arms? If not I will continue to define the "relationships" ( relationships defined by scientifically scrutinizing both symmetry ( that which is seen by the "eye" and interpreted by the brain) and sound( that which is heard by the "ear" and interpreted by the brain).

An elephant doesn't have arms do they? Don't be so quick to say...NO! Rather, we are seeing that AS THE human "arms, shoulder and chest muscles" work together to "lift the hands," AS WELLl.... form the symmetry of an elephants head and trunk...SO TO the elephants "jaw, neck and facial muscles" "lift the trunk" as well....form the symmetry of the "arms, shoulder and chest muscles".... of the human form.

Thus:

Elephant= "elevate hand." Or: The elephant trunk serves to "lift" and reach... up/out/down/right/left...; proportionate to the: Human "arms, shoulders and chest" that: "lift" food and reach... up/out/down/right/left.

"A lift hand"= elephant trunk/human arms. A lift hand= Elephant.
__________________________________________________ ____________

A strange phenomenon indeed...the way information is disseminated throughout all designed things as discovered relative to observing symmetry( light photon interpreted by the brain via the eye) as well as sound( sound interpreted by the brain via the ear.)

A strange phenomenon indeed! Language= The transliteration of image and sound to corresponding association and meaning relative to other intelligent designers...HUMANS! Intelligent humans as possessing or acquiring the ability to interpret intelligent design in: Nature Physic. Information. Humans as primarily showing their ability for intelligent design( designing language systems) so as to understand and record the intelligent design witnessed everywhere, within all flora and fauna.

Is it..also... a mere coincidence that the human torso is also referred to as the human.....TRUNK? Not any more coincidental perhaps that the elephants head and TRUNK is representatively.... ( as to symmetry and sound...with no mystic connotations implied ).... the distinct shape of the human torso and arms.

This....OCCURS...everywhere and relative to everything. This thread will make this abundantly clear through simple observations and experiments. This thread will make this so evident that a consideration of this thread ( with full undivided attention) may help us to better comprehend....TOE
__________________________________________________ ______
In the next posts I will continue to show the elephants head and trunk from different relative angles. By so doing the experiments ( and principles so derived from observation and experiment) will continue to expand. The information implications will become clearer. The experiments will stand on their own merits as: TOE approximate.........?

[picturepeculiar]

More images showing the defined ( defined relative to observation and experiment) relationship ( relativity to).
__________________________________________________ ____________________________________________


Is there a "reason"("design or purpose") why the animal "armadillo" is called what it is? Armadillo?

Does the word "amour" help us in understanding the.... reason. How about the expression: "amour metal( "metal amour")( amour madill)? As it is: 'Metal armor'( armourdillo) was worn over the shoulder protecting the "arms."..?

These experiments( preceeding principles derrived from observation and experiment)..if consistent.... should tell us that: The symmetry of the human arm and shoulder forms the exact symmetric shape of an "armadillo." Does it? We will observe and experiment with this postulate.

One thing for "seemingly sure": If the armadillo is found represented as to symmetry relative to these parts of the human anatomy...such would represent another 'coincidence/chance occurrance'....right?

Perhaps the human arm 'evolved' to be an armadillo; or the armadillo shed its metal armour and evolved to be a human arm.

Or perhaps we are seeing evidence of intelligent patterning throughout ..Nature Physic....and as such we are seeing evidence of ...intelligent design.

[picturepeculiar]

I welcome any responses or observations relative to the "information' I am presenting

[picturepeculiar]

I will shift the methodologies of the room so as to allowthose who respond to demonstrate by their own observations the veracity of mypostulates. I will begin by asking those who visit... and who wish to participate;the following question:
What words or names can you see insinuated within the word....GRACILIS
Remember we are seeking to discern solid information relationshipsbetween what humans have "chosen" to call things...and those things as heard or visualized throughout nature...physic.
Note: Each perspective letter in the word"gracilis" represents a certain volume of information that humankindhas intelligently interpreted from nature and assimilated into their languages.Languages as bearing very profound relationships with everything that existsaround us in nature. Letters are demonstratively representative as symbols thatbear sound and corresponding meaning.
Further note: As you try to discern any words or expressionsfound within the word "gracilis" remember that relative to theEnglish language each letter produces a variety of sound ( we will call:"shades of" sound). For instance the letter "G" has both ahard sound produced in the back of the throat (similar to the "k"sound) ...and the "dge" sound. The consonant "R" producesnuances of sound as the tongue; lips, throat and breath cooperate so as to define/qualify these sounds.The letter "A" has a variety of accenting’s. Etc...
As you try to discern the many words that are produced inthe word "gracilis" continue to alternate the way each letter can bepronounced perspectively. What words or expressions can you find in the word...GRACILIS?





I will demonstrate what occurs when you find these wordsafter receiving your responses. Thanx.