Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: speed of light

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    speed of light

    for all electromagnetic waves, the speed is the product of wavelength and frequency. Frequency must, by its definition of cycle per unit period, be a rational number. For fractional periods imply the existence of a smaller fundamental period. So, there must exist also a smallest period which can be identically zero if time is a continuous function of itself. If the speed of light is known as an irrational number then the wavelength must be an irrational number so that the speed can be the product of an irrational and a rational number.

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    What are (or you think are) the two ratioanl and irrational numbers that have the product which is the speed of light? Can this be measured?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What are (or you think are) the two ratioanl and irrational numbers that have the product which is the speed of light?
    the wavelength and frequency of a photon with a given energy.

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    the wavelength and frequency of a photon with a given energy.
    Which is the irrational and which is the rational? And mostimportantly, why is each this?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    the frequency must be rational otherwise the definition of a period is meaningless or its values is exactly zero and infinite. The wavelength can be irrational because any length larger than Planck length is continuous and continuity is another name for irrationality.

  6. #6
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    the frequency must be rational otherwise the definition of a period is meaningless or its values is exactly zero and infinite. The wavelength can be irrational because any length larger than Planck length is continuous and continuity is another name for irrationality.
    So space-time is irrational if it is looked from higher than planck's legth and time, but rational when looked from there downwards?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    but rational when looked from there downwards?
    there is still no answer to this question unless spacetime is quantized.

  8. #8
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    there is still no answer to this question unless spacetime is quantized.
    Now I see. If something can be infinatelly diveded it is irratioanal. If not, rational.

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    rational numbers are numbers expressable by fractions and fractions are the ratio of integers. The quantum numbers of quantum mechanics can only be integers. This can imply that all quantum theories must use rational descriptions. But the most important constant of QM is Planck's constant of action and it is an irrational number.

  10. #10
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    rational numbers are numbers expressable by fractions and fractions are the ratio of integers. The quantum numbers of quantum mechanics can only be integers. This can imply that all quantum theories must use rational descriptions. But the most important constant of QM is Planck's constant of action and it is an irrational number.
    Maybe planck's constant as a fraction is not irrational?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. My Time Paradox
    By Guille in forum Time Travel
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 07:12 AM
  2. The cause of gravity
    By wisp in forum Forces of Nature
    Replies: 152
    Last Post: 06-21-2007, 03:57 PM
  3. The TOE part one:
    By baudrunner in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 03-19-2006, 01:35 PM
  4. My Project For A Central Time-coordinates System
    By humanbydefault in forum Spacetime
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-13-2006, 10:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top