ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Green Belt

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 59
0 david44 is below the default
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
11-16-2005, 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
David44;
You state in you very first opening of your web site to ignore scientific procedures and listen to what you have to say.

We have come out of the dark ages into a technological era that requires us to present proof in the form of experimental measure. Unfortunately this creates problems when our view of reality is so distorted by ambiguous interpretations of the numbers is presented by scientifically overzealous authors that present hypotheses as though they are proven facts. You seem to be just another victim of these book salesmen.

Your paradigm of reality needs to be corrected. Though you have recognized the placement of some of the pieces, you have yet to put the puzzle together to see the total picture of reality. The solution may even be simpler than what you think.
Without the science, you only have conjecture.
Best regards;
Dave

PS: Quote history only to those who don't know it. I am quite aware of the misconception of political, academic, and religious temples that define the words of wisdom falsely; just as I recognize your misconceptions.



Hi Dave,

I think my previous answer covers this quite well.

However, you do say that I have found some of the pieces but not the total picture. And yet you are still unable to give me anything I can work with. All you seem to be doing so far is giving me rhetoric and lip. Common Dave, give me something I can work with.

cheers David
Reply With Quote
david44 is offlineReport Post
Banned

subversion's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 562
Blog Entries: 2
0 subversion is on a distinguished road
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
11-16-2005, 05:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
Subversion;
In other posts of mine I have stated that the photon is a quantity of energy absorbed or emitted. This quantity of energy can be mathematically converted to "RELATIVE mass" using Einstein's equation. Since the photon is actually a wave, it dose not have "REST mass". When we say "mass", of an entity, it is the rest mass that is being referred to. The rest mass of a photon therefore is ZERO.
This appears to be a difficult aspect of physics for people to grasp. It is probably due to the fact that it is not often taught in high school physics.

REST MASS ENERGY EQUATION
E^2 =p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4
p is momentum = to the product of mass and velocity.

Einstein simply theorized that radiant energy could not have rest mass and thus the p^2 c^2 part of the rest mass equation goes to zero resulting in E=mc^2.
Even relative mass is affected by gravity. (See Antonio's post)

Those who wish to endeavor into proposing a TOE, I feel should at least have knowledge of the basic physics of current Standard Models. Don't you? It is quite easy to detect how well people do their homework when reading these web sites. A good example of an excellent web site is the one presented by "wisp" on this forum. It is quite obvious he knows physics even though I do not agree with his findings, I do respect his work.

First let's get one thing straight. Whether something is mass or energy is irrelevant; that's relativity. AND Mathematically converting energy to so-called "relative mass" is an abstract concept with no basis in terms of reality, again an irrelevant construct. That is because subdividing einstein's equations into its two technical parts, "momentum" mass and "rest" mass, is an unnecessary and somewhat faulty deed not supported by empirical physical evidence. Please show me empirical evidence if you disagree. In nature, you will find there is only one type of mass, and it is equal to energy, thus there is only one type of thing, and it is equal to something; I repeat, that's relativity.

Furthermore, even if it did exist, The theoretical rest mass of a photon is never 0, EVER! Otherwise it would be nothing. Instead, it is always EXACTLY equal to one divided by infinity. Mathematics (which again is only an abstraction) holds that one divided by infinity equals zero, but in reality this is NEVER true, EVER! Only Virtually is it true, with the very important difference being that one divided by infinity is SOMETHING (always) and 0 is still NOTHING (always), no matter what mathematics tries to pretend. Thus matters of principle override mathematic suppositions.

This is all outlined in the supposed, so-called, quote un-quote "Theory of Everything" which I have "discovered" without doubt. The "Theory of Everything" holds that the smallest units of our environment, by nature, are something, to the smallest degree (get it?). This may sound like the most obvious, stupid, or logical conclusion, and yet still not very helpful. That is because I still have yet to explain everything to you, haha, and you will know in time friend, surely.

I study engineering and astrophysics at a Technical University and am well-versed in all the common (mis)conceptions and paradigms of science. I'm an intelligent human just like most of the people on this forum, and I am a positive person who has grave concern for the future. I think you will find that I am very intelligent, and altruistic, and well balanced, and you may be surprised in what I will teach you. Pleased to meet you, they call me subversion (so far) but you may be free to call me whatever you wish! Happy Freedom!
Reply With Quote
subversion is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Intro to what Supertrings are james l. digol String Theory 29 07-03-2008 03:07 PM
WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB Serge Patlavskiy Theory Characteristics 3 09-11-2007 11:18 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.