Theory of Everything

[david44]

David44;
You state in you very first opening of your web site to ignore scientific procedures and listen to what you have to say.

We have come out of the dark ages into a technological era that requires us to present proof in the form of experimental measure. Unfortunately this creates problems when our view of reality is so distorted by ambiguous interpretations of the numbers is presented by scientifically overzealous authors that present hypotheses as though they are proven facts. You seem to be just another victim of these book salesmen.

Your paradigm of reality needs to be corrected. Though you have recognized the placement of some of the pieces, you have yet to put the puzzle together to see the total picture of reality. The solution may even be simpler than what you think.
Without the science, you only have conjecture.
Best regards;
Dave

PS: Quote history only to those who don't know it. I am quite aware of the misconception of political, academic, and religious temples that define the words of wisdom falsely; just as I recognize your misconceptions.

Hi Dave,

I think my previous answer covers this quite well.

However, you do say that I have found some of the pieces but not the total picture. And yet you are still unable to give me anything I can work with. All you seem to be doing so far is giving me rhetoric and lip. Common Dave, give me something I can work with.

cheers David

[subversion]

Subversion;
In other posts of mine I have stated that the photon is a quantity of energy absorbed or emitted. This quantity of energy can be mathematically converted to "RELATIVE mass" using Einstein's equation. Since the photon is actually a wave, it dose not have "REST mass". When we say "mass", of an entity, it is the rest mass that is being referred to. The rest mass of a photon therefore is ZERO.
This appears to be a difficult aspect of physics for people to grasp. It is probably due to the fact that it is not often taught in high school physics.

REST MASS ENERGY EQUATION
E^2 =p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4
p is momentum = to the product of mass and velocity.

Einstein simply theorized that radiant energy could not have rest mass and thus the p^2 c^2 part of the rest mass equation goes to zero resulting in E=mc^2.
Even relative mass is affected by gravity. (See Antonio's post)

Those who wish to endeavor into proposing a TOE, I feel should at least have knowledge of the basic physics of current Standard Models. Don't you? It is quite easy to detect how well people do their homework when reading these web sites. A good example of an excellent web site is the one presented by "wisp" on this forum. It is quite obvious he knows physics even though I do not agree with his findings, I do respect his work.

First let's get one thing straight. Whether something is mass or energy is irrelevant; that's relativity. AND Mathematically converting energy to so-called "relative mass" is an abstract concept with no basis in terms of reality, again an irrelevant construct. That is because subdividing einstein's equations into its two technical parts, "momentum" mass and "rest" mass, is an unnecessary and somewhat faulty deed not supported by empirical physical evidence. Please show me empirical evidence if you disagree. In nature, you will find there is only one type of mass, and it is equal to energy, thus there is only one type of thing, and it is equal to something; I repeat, that's relativity.

Furthermore, even if it did exist, The theoretical rest mass of a photon is never 0, EVER! Otherwise it would be nothing. Instead, it is always EXACTLY equal to one divided by infinity. Mathematics (which again is only an abstraction) holds that one divided by infinity equals zero, but in reality this is NEVER true, EVER! Only Virtually is it true, with the very important difference being that one divided by infinity is SOMETHING (always) and 0 is still NOTHING (always), no matter what mathematics tries to pretend. Thus matters of principle override mathematic suppositions.

This is all outlined in the supposed, so-called, quote un-quote "Theory of Everything" which I have "discovered" without doubt. The "Theory of Everything" holds that the smallest units of our environment, by nature, are something, to the smallest degree (get it?). This may sound like the most obvious, stupid, or logical conclusion, and yet still not very helpful. That is because I still have yet to explain everything to you, haha, and you will know in time friend, surely.

I study engineering and astrophysics at a Technical University and am well-versed in all the common (mis)conceptions and paradigms of science. I'm an intelligent human just like most of the people on this forum, and I am a positive person who has grave concern for the future. I think you will find that I am very intelligent, and altruistic, and well balanced, and you may be surprised in what I will teach you. Pleased to meet you, they call me subversion (so far) but you may be free to call me whatever you wish! Happy Freedom!

[paul tatham]

My original statement was made in about 2005 and I had forgotten I had done it. It's now 2011 so I will provide and update.
Many scientific errors have been made. Einstein's curved space, spacetime and time dilation are wrong. De Broglie's spontaneous emission of photons is wrong. Thus science has been pursuing the wrong direction for over 50 years. Every proton radiates a positive particle. It is the Higgs Boson as predicted by GUT's. Some collect energy from orbiting electrons and become photons. The particle produces momentum. So photons have mass. It is the 'missing mass'. This momentum is transferred only to electrons giving them mass (the Higgs effect). Because the particle is positive it causes electrons to move the opposite way = gravity. Casimir, Shapiro and Pound-Rebka have all drawn wrong conclusions in their proof of General Relativity. E = mc2 is a process that takes time, hence there must be a maximum velocity (which proves photons contain a particle). Time dilation is because 'change' slows as velocity increases. That is why a clock goes slower, but time is just man's invention to measure change. There is no 'Time' in the universe, only energy.

[labelwench]

My original statement was made in about 2005 and I had forgotten I had done it. It's now 2011 so I will provide and update.
Many scientific errors have been made. Einstein's curved space, spacetime and time dilation are wrong. De Broglie's spontaneous emission of photons is wrong. Thus science has been pursuing the wrong direction for over 50 years. Every proton radiates a positive particle. It is the Higgs Boson as predicted by GUT's. Some collect energy from orbiting electrons and become photons. The particle produces momentum. So photons have mass. It is the 'missing mass'. This momentum is transferred only to electrons giving them mass (the Higgs effect). Because the particle is positive it causes electrons to move the opposite way = gravity. Casimir, Shapiro and Pound-Rebka have all drawn wrong conclusions in their proof of General Relativity. E = mc2 is a process that takes time, hence there must be a maximum velocity (which proves photons contain a particle). Time dilation is because 'change' slows as velocity increases. That is why a clock goes slower, but time is just man's invention to measure change. There is no 'Time' in the universe, only energy.

Hello Paul.

I am not one of the stronger scientific posters to this forum, yet I do consider myself to be observant, and it is my thought that there are so many interesting theories, yet all of them cannot be entirely accurate, although they may share some consistency of observation, from differing perspectives.

Whether there is a single 'Theory of Everything' or whether this is unlikely as Stephen Hawkings and Leonard Mlodinow suggest in their book, The Grand Design, the seeking continues and remains an interesting topic.

[paul tatham]

The only way to move knowledge forward is by peer acceptance of papers. I hope to achieve this in the next few weeks, if not I will do more work until it is achieved. These threads are not really adequate to provide all the explanation and proof required, and so just causes geeks to become critical (no specific person intended). I too have a book, which I will not advertise here, but you should be able to find it if you wish to know more of my conclusions, eg Dark Energy.

[Rybo]

I agree that photons have a mass.

Mass is alledeged to curve a something called space.

This space is known by some as spactime gravity.

Mass is a collection of interferences. Higgs bosons are alledged to be what is infering to create mass.

I believe it specific patterns of interfering sets of gravitons that may create the alledged Higgs.

--<->-- = graviton tubulars compose a geodesic, great circle-like arc ( geodesic arcs )

These tubular geodesics interferingly overlap ( ( ) ) and create mass (*).

( (*) ) (*) ) ( (*) ) = wave/particle

\ /*\/\*/\/*\ = wave/particle

The motion of a spiraling wave may define a tubular pattern.

Tubular patterns most likely interfere, if only tangentally so, it may be the point(s) of tangency that are our virtual particles popping into and out of space.

H,mmm actually I had a thought in bed the other night about the occurrence of these virtual particles and only now, some days later recalling I had and interesting thought in their direction. Darn.....I recall it be revalatory almost...ha! Rybo