A Vortex Universe

[spyroe]

Hello

My idea for quantifying space is simple, vortexes on each axis of perception. It's a representation of structure within chaos.This shape has attributes that fit into many areas of science.
Think of it as a particle and a wave combined.
This shape represents one quantum and the entire universe.
The model assumes that the universe has direction, distinct areas and finite.
The model assumes that an atoms nucleus is unique - There are 32 different protons/neutrons.
Watch this video on youtube, hope you like it.
http://www.youtube.com/user/quantumg...l?feature=mhsn
cheers

[PoPpAScience]

Hello

My idea for quantifying space is simple, vortexes on each axis of perception. It's a representation of structure within chaos.This shape has attributes that fit into many areas of science.
Think of it as a particle and a wave combined.
This shape represents one quantum and the entire universe.
The model assumes that the universe has direction, distinct areas and finite.
The model assumes that an atoms nucleus is unique - There are 32 different protons/neutrons.
Watch this video on youtube, hope you like it.
http://www.youtube.com/user/quantumg...l?feature=mhsn
cheers

Welcome to Toequest Spyroe. Vincent and I are Vortex Buddies, would you like to join? Is that video yours? Do you have a theory and it posted?

That video is exactly what I have envisioned in my head, with some crude drawings lying around. I'll try and find the post I made in here with my vision of the "proton dynamo" as I call it. I used mini tornatoes for visualization. Now I in no way have envisioned past the philosophical side of this idea, I look to Vincent for the technical side of things. I do know if Vincent has pursued my post to him on the "proton dynamo" or not?

Have you found Vincents thread on Vortexes here? Here is the link: http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-t...arity-123.html

A vortex buddy, Allen.

[mkirkpatrick]

Hello

My idea for quantifying space is simple, vortexes on each axis of perception. It's a representation of structure within chaos.This shape has attributes that fit into many areas of science.
Think of it as a particle and a wave combined.
This shape represents one quantum and the entire universe.
The model assumes that the universe has direction, distinct areas and finite.
The model assumes that an atoms nucleus is unique - There are 32 different protons/neutrons.
Watch this video on youtube, hope you like it.
http://www.youtube.com/user/quantumg...l?feature=mhsn
cheers

Welcome spyroe to this toequest forum,I like the idea of a vortex universe as it fits neatly into how I see the universe working and interacting,look forward to your further posting on this matter.

warm regards michael.

[PoPpAScience]

Hi Spyroe. Just looked at video again with sound up, and am giddy with excitement You said you used intuition, I quess that would go well with my common sense way of envisioning it.

You used uniformly sized vortex, where in mine I had used different sizes(like quarks). But I think like yours better.

A vortex buddy, Allen.

[spyroe]

Thanks for the quick response guys. Yes this is my video. I'm aware of other vortex ideas. I do have a lot more to say about how I think this model fits into mainstream beliefs in physics but I am being cautious about it. Mainly because I have no scientific proof. Intuition apparently isn't enough so I'm hoping others will see this model and make scientific conclusions.

[spacedout]

Those 4 vorteses makes sense but there will be two up spins and two down spins; it doesn't address charge of quarks and leptons. The rotations of the pairs are sound but does this explain 1/2 spin where two turns are neccessary for 1/2 spin? Actually the aether may be made of tetrahydral spins one connecting to neighbors filling space with a neutral field. The problem is where does the 4 vortexes get energy?

[PoPpAScience]

Spyroe you do not need to be cautious in Toequest, free thinking is encourage here by most.

[spyroe]

Not sure about the 1/2 spin question. I have thought about it in the past, only thing I came up with is a temperture difference.
Not sure what u mean about 2 up spins and 2 down spins.

[PoPpAScience]

By your join date Spyroe, it took you 6 years to post your video. And by your minimum responses here today, I guess it will be years to your next post So sad, because for a bit there I thought you would become another Vortex Buddy, LOL.

[spacedout]

Not sure about the 1/2 spin question. I have thought about it in the past, only thing I came up with is a temperture difference.
Not sure what u mean about 2 up spins and 2 down spins.

For a cluster of vortexes to exist, each has to be geared together so that one vortex is spinning clockwise against a counter clockwise vortex---many cone vortexes rotating together as a unit. Only even number of vortexes will work. The vortexes would move out into space and return into the particle like lines of force. The question is, how do you get the charges for quarks and leptons and 1/2 spin? Half spin is like taking two coins, fixing one coin and rotating the other around the set coin. The rotating coin will take two turnes after rolling around from start to finish around the set coin. Another problem is; where does the vortex get its energy? It must happen by chance and then dissappear.