[XarGoth]

I will begin my theory with just a "premise"(for now) :

Our universe is not really alone within space-time, and it really is not irrelevant what is outside of it. As i am suggesting that space-time is made of

Universe - Point Zero - And i-Verse

So here is how i ended up with such an idea;

First of all i will start with the most famous formula E=mc^2, as you can see instead of only c, mass energy relation is formulated by the square of c, so i asked the question, why?

Let's think about relativistic mass, mr= mo/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

As you can see square of c is in place again, but this formula shows us a little more. This formulation can have three results.

- Positive result
- Undefined result
- Imaginary (number) result

Anything associated with c and relativity can only give these results..And unlike most people think, when you formulate time dilation and use V > c you do not get a negative result, it is an imaginary result which DOES NOT mean when V>c you travel back in time, in fact i find it really absurd why people make such a conclusion..

Here is where i-Verse and Point Zero comes in, because when V > c the event should occur in a place, and it absolutly is not our universe..So i called this place i-Verse(with respect to sqrt-1 = i), but still i had this undefined result, so i named it Point Zero. Point Zero is the most important part of this theory, because with it i could explain why it is c^2 instead of c..

As you can see Point Zero should be a place where both universe and i-Verse are in effect. While it is the only place where mass turns into energy, it is quite clear why we ended up with E= m.c of i-Verse.c of Universe.

Ask me questions i have much more than this but i want to explain with questions, which i think would be much better.

[XarGoth]

While i am waiting for questions;

Mass increases as our V increases and we experience time dilation, which is because as we are getting closer to c, we are infact getting closer to Point Zero..

As i said Point Zero is affected by both i-Verse and Universe, so it is clear that as we are getting closer to Point Zero we are being affected by both more and more. Which changes all of our dimensions and our mass relativly for both..

-

Light itself travels towards Point Zero. which is why it is c no matter what your V is..Because light leaves our universe as soon as it is born. What it has left behind is just oscilations noting more.

To understand this easily, think that you are within a singularity. Now you accelarerate to leave this singularity and of course you leave it in an instant..But for something else within this singularity you did travel all the way to outside, which is only relativly true..

I find this explanation much better tho as i said it is just for understanding not the truth i am talking about here.

-

Length dilation is same..You start losing your dimensions within universe and after hitting the barrier and entering Point Zero you no longer have dimensions..If you could pass through as a whole you would start gaining dimensions in i-Verse as your V goes greater and greater than c of Universe..

-

The Name Point Zero;

I gave it this name because in my i-Verse,Universe you reach c by slowing down not by accelaration as in i-Verse,Universe c is the slowest speed you could get(Rest)..When your V reaches "zero" you reach Point Zero. And if you could pass through point zero as a whole you would start accelarating to stay in i-Verse and you would reach Rest at c..Or in i-Verse you could slow down and travel back to Universe, and in Universe you could get Rest by accelarating to c.. I know this is a bit confusing but i am sure with a little thinking about it you will figure it out easily..

Here is how it goes:

c------------> 0 <-------------c
Universe-----> 0 <------- i-Verse

When values become imaginary it means the event goes on within i-Verse

[yogi]

Originally Posted by XarGoth

While i am waiting for questions;

Light itself travels towards Point Zero. which is why it is c no matter what your V is..Because light leaves our universe as soon as it is born. What it has left behind is just oscilations noting more.

To understand this easily, think that you are within a singularity. Now you accelarerate to leave this singularity and of course you leave it in an instant..But for something else within this singularity you did travel all the way to outside, which is only relativly true..

Hi,
My question to you- Have we defined 0 and Infinity ? (some people from our forum believe that, infinity is just a concept)
In my opinion once defined, we can apply or use them in formulae as you have suggested.

sinncerely,
yogi

[XarGoth]

Hello and thank you for the question Yogi;

I would like to begin with infinity. As you know equations associated with relativity, you can only get one infinity which is in fact not an infinity but is undefined "1/0" ..

While x / 0 always gives us an undefined result, i suggest that these results show us that the event takes place within Point Zero thus both irrelevant for i-Verse and Universe.

I must add that in my theory, Point Zero can only be reached by turning into Energy(E=mc^2) and this energy has to choose which way it is going to continue, towards i-Verse or the Universe. But as we have found out if the probability is %50 a paradox occurs and at this point energy is released on both.

And this explains where all those quantum particles are coming from or where they are dissapearing into (Lorentz Factor).

Back to infinity, Such a value does not exist..As you can not get 10 marbels out of a bag which contains only 8 marbles, you can never get infinity out of a finite universe. It is just a concept like a square or a point, they just help us to explain things. Has anyone ever seen a two dimensional object(a square)? Well,i have not.

Now about "Zero"..

Zero is used for lack of existance, for example on earth when you open your purse and there is no money in it. To explain this mathematically you are going to use "0" for it. But unlike most people think "Zero" is only used for an object's quantity, and if it is not about an object or a set of objects. It has only a virtual meaning "noting".

But as it is in infinity, noting is just a concept too. For zero my theory doesn't suggest anything at this point.

Within this graph

c---------> 0 <----------c

"0" is just the lack of Velocity, if that was what you were asking.

[Guille]

Let me explain what I think:

Infinity and zero are concepts. I don't deny that, if we adquire a better mathematical knwoeldge, we will be bale of using them perfectly in formulas in physics, etz. In fact, zero is already used, for example, as the most beautiful equation of maths shows: e^(i*pi)+1=0.

Now, infinite is a harder concept, because we are not familiarized with it. It's easier to understand something that represents a simple equation as n-n, than to understand a concept that represents no barriers.

If you have manage equations with infinity, please post them here.