Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    perturbation theory and time axis

    The successful application of Feynman diagram for all calculations in QED testified the power and effectiveness of perturbation theory and its method of approximation. However, many physicists would rather calculate without it. The problem is they do not know how.

    In view of the conceptual existence of time axis, there is now good reason for believing that perturbation theory has become unavoidable in mathematical analysis as an induction of approximation into an otherwise exact science. This indicates that WKB approximation, power series expansion, asymptotic expansion, Taylor series expansion or any other approximations all become valid justification for their application in a search for a final physical theory.

    The equivalent definition of a time axis is the proper time [math]d\tau[/math] of a Minkowsky four dimensional coordinate system such that the [math]\tau[/math] derivative of an infinitesimal interval of time [math]dt[/math] is equal to the [math]\gamma [/math] factor of special relativity.

    [math]\gamma=\frac{dt}{d\tau}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}=[/math]

    Furthermore, the application of the ta operator, [math]\frac{\partial x_i}{\partial}[/math], to the inverse of [math]\tau[/math] or its Legendre transform gives the constant of light speed whose square gives a Lorentz invariance for the inner product of fundamental acceleration and fundamental length, [math]\mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{r} = c^2[/math].

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Do you think there is a way of avoiding perturbation theory in mathematical analyse?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    GUILLE,

    At this point, I don't know how to use perturbation theory to do any approximate computation. All my computations are based on matrix multiplications with integers solutions.

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    GUILLE,

    At this point, I don't know how to use perturbation theory to do any approximate computation. All my computations are based on matrix multiplications with integers solutions.
    Can there be made computations based on tensors/tensor analysis?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,789
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    GUILLE,

    I don't know how to do tensor computations either, although tensors are written in matrices. That's as far as I know.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. An Intro to what Supertrings are
    By james l. digol in forum String Theory
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 09-13-2011, 05:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top