[Rufus]

Guille and Antonio

Call it anti-matter if you wish but the idea of a balance with our so-called matter, being required, is quite universal.

The matter of which you speak does not exist in the first place, and the lack of it is the balance required. You can appreciate the appearancy of matter through your senses only and this is how it appears to exist but does not.

Paul Dirac is quite correct in his assumptions but he is using a faulty math system. Mathematics of this nature is too inflexible to be of any use.

Namron (Rufus)

[Guille]

Originally Posted by Rufus Call it anti-matter if you wish but the idea of a balance with our so-called matter, being required, is quite universal.

I don't get what you mean by this?

Originally Posted by Rufus The matter of which you speak does not exist in the first place, and the lack of it is the balance required. You can appreciate the appearancy of matter through your senses only and this is how it appears to exist but does not.

If you think anti-matter doesn't exist, what are black holes made of? What are the particles of our matter changed to their opposite charge?

Originally Posted by Rufus Paul Dirac is quite correct in his assumptions but he is using a faulty math system. Mathematics of this nature is too inflexible to be of any use.

Well, I can think of two uses: explaining and understanding nature and controling and predicting nature. And any way, the math is not inflexible anymore, not since the xx century: QM, chaos theory, statistical calculus... The math of the universe is now completely statistical, randomized, unsure and probabilistic.

[michellemfry]

Being composed of matter, I'm not sure anti-matter is fathomable. It's existence is beyond ours.

[Rufus]

Originally Posted by <<>> I don't get what you mean by this? If you think anti-matter doesn't exist, what are black holes made of? What are the particles of our matter changed to their opposite charge? If everything is ethereal when approaching a black hole you would encounter the expected and collectively the approaching entities (you and yer buds in a space ship) would experience their theoretical views. I don't know what the heck a black hole would be comprised of. It would act like one whenever a sensate being interacted with it. On a practical level we use black holes as an avenue through the negetive aspect of our reality. Black holes are what we use to deposit the great mass of the universe in balance, and we consider it to be composed of anti matter and also the transition point for matter to anti matter. If I'm wrong on some of that let me know. Well, I can think of two uses: explaining and understanding nature and controling and predicting nature. And any way, the math is not inflexible anymore, not since the xx century: QM, chaos theory, statistical calculus... The math of the universe is now completely statistical, randomized, unsure and probabilistic.

I really appreciate this information GUILLE ..would you explain QM ??? and anything more you have on this math thing like a link would be good.

[Guille]

Rufus,

Thanks for the thoughts on black holes. Anyway, I'm not sure if the universe is aethereal/ethereal. I believe we can explain entropy, antimatter-matter, blackholes-whiteholes, universal expansion... All by the idea of two universes.

Now, I'm not an expert so I don't know all about QM and it's math or how it should be explaine. All I know I've either read on the intern, or from these forums, or from a pair of books I've read... For example, Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy is thatwe cannot know the position and momentum of a particle because our own measurement of it will alter these numbers (we measure this by fighting photons (light) at, for example, an electron). Chaos theory is not directly linked to QM but is an important theory for physics (and recent discoveries since the 80s to know have explained how we can use the theory to explain also biological, sociological, psycological... themes), starts from the idea of fractals (developed by Mandelbrot), which are mathematical objects with infinite measurement and yet a real finite length. For example, the coast of UK is infinite for fractals, because you can be getting better and more exact at the measurement by using smaller and smaller scales, for ever. Chaos theory studies systems which are unpredictable and unstable, which are extremelly hard to understand for they can't be known themeselves to be how they are (tough math is needed). For example, somke comming out a cigarret can be said to be a chaotic system. The thing speciallists deal with is to be able of explaining how to use math for prediciting the smoke's way, if we know that there are infinite possible ways (for they are) but a finite space-time. Strange attractors are also studied by chaos, but I can't explain them, although I do understand them.