ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,010
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-07-2005, 03:28 PM
rigid vs. nonrigid transformations

There are at least three special kinds of rigid transformations. These are, not in any order of importance, translation (T), rotation (R), and reflection (M). Using Cartesian coordinate geometry of 2D Euclidean spacetime, the following mappings always hold true.

T(x,t)=(x+\\Delta x, t+ \\Delta t)

R(x,t)=(xcos\theta-tsin\theta, xsin\theta+tcos\theta)

M_S(x,t)=(x, -t) reflection in the space axis.

M_T(x,t)=(-x, t) reflection in the time axis.

The distinction of all rigid transformations is that they do not stretch (dilate), shrink (contract), or twist (curve) the transformed events. Two transformed events do not move closer together or farther apart in spacetime. In other words, events always stay the same distance from each other. Furthermore, the Pythagorean Theorem determines this distance. The mechanics is Newtonian and the spacetime is Galilean.

Nonrigid transformations give relativistic mechanics and Minkowskian spacetime. For transformed events involving dilation and contraction refer to Einstein’s special theory of relativity and for the ones involving twisting and curvatures refer to Einstein’s general theory of relativity.
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-08-2005, 06:19 AM
Is there any other "non-main" rigid/non-rigid kind of transformation?

What about division (breaking)?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,010
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-08-2005, 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
What about division (breaking)?
The divisions of vectors are undefined as far as I know. I'm not sure about tensors divisions.
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-08-2005, 09:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The divisions of vectors are undefined as far as I know. I'm not sure about tensors divisions.
A division of something mathematical as a vector I think that can only lead to other vectors (depending on the number of parts resulting).

If not, is it possible that, let's say, if a tensor is devided, then the parts are vectors?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,010
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-10-2005, 09:55 PM
GUILLE,

Vectors have two components, the magnitude and the direction. Although magnitude can be divided, direction cannot.
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-11-2005, 05:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
GUILLE,

Vectors have two components, the magnitude and the direction. Although magnitude can be divided, direction cannot.
Can the parts of the magnitude re-unify?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,010
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
08-12-2005, 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Can the parts of the magnitude re-unify?
parts re-unified signify continuity and divided signify quantization.
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
2nd degree Black Belt

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 332
Blog Entries: 7
11 theunify is on a distinguished road
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
02-25-2007, 08:48 PM
Post Re: rigid vs. nonrigid transformations

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
parts re-unified signify continuity and divided signify quantization.
Quite right, what about the process of division, I have been thinking about this fine point for awhile, the process it seems is continuous and the result is defined, but if we can agree to a mathematical process of division, then I think we could define this universally for all particles. It is necesarily discrete and immaterial what process we agree on so long as it is scaleable.
__________________
Reply With Quote
theunify is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,010
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
02-26-2007, 02:56 PM
Re: rigid vs. nonrigid transformations

Quote:
Originally Posted by theunify
but if we can agree to a mathematical process of division
Logarithmically, a process of division becomes a process of subtraction where the dividend is replaced by the minuend and the divisor is replaced by the subtrahend.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.